Stealing the seabed. The Canadian State and the question of Rights and Title over submerged lands

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geoforum Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104108
Rosanna Carver , Erika Gavenus , J.J. Manson
{"title":"Stealing the seabed. The Canadian State and the question of Rights and Title over submerged lands","authors":"Rosanna Carver ,&nbsp;Erika Gavenus ,&nbsp;J.J. Manson","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recognising the seabed as a space of contested Rights and Title requires the Canadian State to fundamentally change its approach to the territories of Indigenous peoples. In 2023, the Canadian State declared an effective moratorium on deep-sea mining within its jurisdiction. While the importance of establishing environmental regulations has been recognised, discussion of access and Indigenous Rights and Title relating to the seafloor is lacking. This is despite challenges to State claims of sovereignty over, and activities pertaining to the seabed being increasingly invoked in the Canadian courts. Indigenous Rights over the seabed complicate State expressions of sovereignty over stolen and unceded marine scapes. However, the State’s definitions of “land” over which Rights are conferred—and the placement of the burden of proof onto Indigenous peoples—only serves to replicate colonial and racial logics of Indigenous peoples as static, both geographically and temporally. In contrast the State affords itself the potential to be flexible, including in how it mobilises the ocean's geo-physical characterstics, as new and emerging industries shape discussions of the seabed as a site of extraction. Instead of extending policies and practices that have been extensively critiqued in relation to terrestrial land, the current moratorium offers an opportunity to reconsider how the State operates with regards to the marine space. Engagement with these questions is necessary, lest the dispossession and theft that occur on land and offshore are continued and repeated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001696","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recognising the seabed as a space of contested Rights and Title requires the Canadian State to fundamentally change its approach to the territories of Indigenous peoples. In 2023, the Canadian State declared an effective moratorium on deep-sea mining within its jurisdiction. While the importance of establishing environmental regulations has been recognised, discussion of access and Indigenous Rights and Title relating to the seafloor is lacking. This is despite challenges to State claims of sovereignty over, and activities pertaining to the seabed being increasingly invoked in the Canadian courts. Indigenous Rights over the seabed complicate State expressions of sovereignty over stolen and unceded marine scapes. However, the State’s definitions of “land” over which Rights are conferred—and the placement of the burden of proof onto Indigenous peoples—only serves to replicate colonial and racial logics of Indigenous peoples as static, both geographically and temporally. In contrast the State affords itself the potential to be flexible, including in how it mobilises the ocean's geo-physical characterstics, as new and emerging industries shape discussions of the seabed as a site of extraction. Instead of extending policies and practices that have been extensively critiqued in relation to terrestrial land, the current moratorium offers an opportunity to reconsider how the State operates with regards to the marine space. Engagement with these questions is necessary, lest the dispossession and theft that occur on land and offshore are continued and repeated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偷窃海床。加拿大国家与水下土地的权利和所有权问题
承认海底是一个有争议的权利和所有权空间,要求加拿大从根本上改变其对土著人民领土的态度。2023 年,加拿大宣布在其管辖范围内有效暂停深海采矿。虽然制定环境法规的重要性已得到承认,但关于海底的准入和土著权利及所有权的讨论却缺乏。尽管加拿大法院越来越多地援引国家对海底主权的主张和与海底有关的活动,对其提出质疑。土著居民对海床的权利使国家对被盗和未被征用的海洋地貌所表达的主权更加复杂。然而,国家对赋予权利的 "土地 "的定义--以及将举证责任强加给土著人民--只会复制殖民和种族逻辑,将土著人民视为静止的,无论是在地理上还是在时间上。与此相反,国家为自己提供了灵活的潜力,包括如何调动海洋的地球物理特征,因为新兴产业塑造了将海底作为开采地点的讨论。当前的暂停令并没有扩大在陆地上受到广泛批评的政策和做法,而是提供了一个机会,重新考虑国家如何在海洋空间运作。有必要对这些问题进行探讨,以免陆地和近海发生的剥夺和盗窃行为继续发生并重演。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
期刊最新文献
‘Never turn your back on the Ocean’: Conversations with Fear on Yuin Sea Country Seeing rivers otherwise: Critical cartography as a form of critical pedagogy The Technopolitics of Hydrogen: Arab Gulf States’ Pursuit of Significance in a Climate-Constrained World Culling optimism: Circulating neoliberal affects in entrepreneurial animal disease policy Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1