Impacts of alternative fuel combustion in cement manufacturing: Life cycle greenhouse gas, biogenic carbon, and criteria air contaminant emissions

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143717
{"title":"Impacts of alternative fuel combustion in cement manufacturing: Life cycle greenhouse gas, biogenic carbon, and criteria air contaminant emissions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Waste products destined for landfills with high calorific value are increasingly being explored for potential use in a variety of industries. One example is the potential use of these wastes in cement kilns to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cement production. This study develops a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) model to estimate the GHG emissions, criteria air contaminants (CAC), and the impact of biogenic carbon accounting methods in biomass-containing alternative fuels (AFs) on life cycle GHG emissions when replacing natural gas with AFs at a cement facility. The proposed AF mixture includes landfill wastes like construction and demolition waste, asphalt shingles, tire fluff, carpet, textiles, and plastics. While many LCAs assume the biogenic fraction's climate impact is carbon-neutral, its actual effects depend on a range of new methods being proposed to account for the climate impacts associated with biogenic carbon. The findings of this study demonstrate a reduction of approximately 7–13% in life cycle GHG emissions. The preliminary estimates suggest that the change to CACs will likely not be materially different from the current use of natural gas. It also emphasizes the importance of accounting for the biogenic fraction in biomass-based AFs, indicating a potential overall reduction of up to 7.2% in life cycle GHG emissions when the biogenic fraction is treated as carbon-neutral. While factoring in the benefits of shorter rotation and longer storage periods results in a 12.7% reduction in life cycle GHG emissions. The LCA model developed in this study holds the potential for broad application among cement facilities that are considering fossil to alternative fuels as part of their GHG emission reduction strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624031664/pdfft?md5=1282c9aacef4489310e454c0ec57442f&pid=1-s2.0-S0959652624031664-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624031664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Waste products destined for landfills with high calorific value are increasingly being explored for potential use in a variety of industries. One example is the potential use of these wastes in cement kilns to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cement production. This study develops a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) model to estimate the GHG emissions, criteria air contaminants (CAC), and the impact of biogenic carbon accounting methods in biomass-containing alternative fuels (AFs) on life cycle GHG emissions when replacing natural gas with AFs at a cement facility. The proposed AF mixture includes landfill wastes like construction and demolition waste, asphalt shingles, tire fluff, carpet, textiles, and plastics. While many LCAs assume the biogenic fraction's climate impact is carbon-neutral, its actual effects depend on a range of new methods being proposed to account for the climate impacts associated with biogenic carbon. The findings of this study demonstrate a reduction of approximately 7–13% in life cycle GHG emissions. The preliminary estimates suggest that the change to CACs will likely not be materially different from the current use of natural gas. It also emphasizes the importance of accounting for the biogenic fraction in biomass-based AFs, indicating a potential overall reduction of up to 7.2% in life cycle GHG emissions when the biogenic fraction is treated as carbon-neutral. While factoring in the benefits of shorter rotation and longer storage periods results in a 12.7% reduction in life cycle GHG emissions. The LCA model developed in this study holds the potential for broad application among cement facilities that are considering fossil to alternative fuels as part of their GHG emission reduction strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水泥生产中替代燃料燃烧的影响:生命周期温室气体、生物碳和标准空气污染物排放
越来越多的人开始探索将被填埋的高热值废品在各行各业中的潜在用途。其中一个例子是在水泥窑中使用这些废物的潜力,以减少水泥生产中的温室气体(GHG)排放。本研究开发了一个 "从摇篮到终点 "生命周期评估(LCA)模型,以估算在水泥设施中用 AFs 替代天然气时,含生物质替代燃料(AFs)的温室气体排放、标准空气污染物(CAC)以及生物碳核算方法对生命周期温室气体排放的影响。拟议的 AF 混合物包括垃圾填埋场废物,如建筑和拆除废物、沥青瓦、轮胎绒、地毯、纺织品和塑料。虽然许多生命周期评估都假定生物碳对气候的影响是碳中性的,但其实际影响取决于一系列新方法的提出,这些新方法用于解释与生物碳相关的气候影响。本研究结果表明,生命周期温室气体排放量可减少约 7-13%。初步估算表明,改用 CAC 可能与目前使用天然气不会有本质区别。该研究还强调了考虑生物质替代燃料中生物质部分的重要性,表明当生物质部分被视为碳中性时,生命周期内温室气体排放的总体降幅可能高达 7.2%。而将更短的轮换期和更长的储存期的益处考虑在内,则可使生命周期内的温室气体排放量减少 12.7%。本研究开发的生命周期评估模型有望在考虑将化石燃料转化为替代燃料作为温室气体减排战略一部分的水泥设施中得到广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Carbon Trading Mechanisms through Innovative Collaboration: Case Studies from Developing Nations Microplastics and their interaction with microorganisms in Bosten Lake Water Consumers' green product purchase intention considering para-social interaction: An experimental study based on live-streaming e-commerce Utilization of Spent Graphite from Lithium-ion Batteries Waste as Sustainable Reinforcing Filler for Thermal, Vibration-Damping, and Noise Control Applications Applications of Machine Learning in Drinking Water Quality Management: A Critical Review on Water Distribution System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1