The Efficacy of Methazolamide Combined With Ibuprofen for Treating Acute Mountain Sickness

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1155/2024/5325393
Wenqi Zhao, Zhiqi Gao, Erlong Zhang, Gang Xu, Binda Sun, Bao Liu, Gang Wu, Shouxian Wang, Yuqi Gao, Jian Chen
{"title":"The Efficacy of Methazolamide Combined With Ibuprofen for Treating Acute Mountain Sickness","authors":"Wenqi Zhao,&nbsp;Zhiqi Gao,&nbsp;Erlong Zhang,&nbsp;Gang Xu,&nbsp;Binda Sun,&nbsp;Bao Liu,&nbsp;Gang Wu,&nbsp;Shouxian Wang,&nbsp;Yuqi Gao,&nbsp;Jian Chen","doi":"10.1155/2024/5325393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Aims:</b> When entering a mountain plateau, people are at risk of developing acute mountain sickness (AMS), for which there are limited prophylactic medicines available. This study aimed at exploring the effectiveness of ibuprofen, acetazolamide, and methazolamide in preventing AMS and at providing valuable insights for the future development of related drugs.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A total of 137 mountaineers were recruited for this study and divided into six groups: a control group, an ibuprofen group, an acetazolamide group, a methazolamide group, an ibuprofen/methazolamide combination group, and a high-dose ibuprofen/methazolamide combination group. After the assigned drug was taken for three days at a lower elevation (300 m), the participants ascended to a plateau environment at 5050 m. The Lake Louise AMS Score (LLS) system was used to diagnose and evaluate the AMS rates of the mountaineers in each group, and the results were compared through statistical analysis.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> The results show that all the medications tested herein were effective in preventing AMS, but their level of effectiveness varied. The prevalence of AMS was 50.00% in the control group, 14.29% in the ibuprofen group, 5.56% in the acetazolamide group, 27.27% in the methazolamide group, 44.8% in the ibuprofen and methazolamide group, and 22.50% in the high-dose ibuprofen and methazolamide group. Acetazolamide demonstrated a significant prophylactic effect on symptoms related to AMS diagnosis, and ibuprofen showed the best efficacy for preventing headache.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Acetazolamide remains an effective medicine for preventing AMS. Ibuprofen combined with methazolamide is less effective than ibuprofen alone to prevent AMS.</p>\n <p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-12002219</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5325393","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5325393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: When entering a mountain plateau, people are at risk of developing acute mountain sickness (AMS), for which there are limited prophylactic medicines available. This study aimed at exploring the effectiveness of ibuprofen, acetazolamide, and methazolamide in preventing AMS and at providing valuable insights for the future development of related drugs.

Methods: A total of 137 mountaineers were recruited for this study and divided into six groups: a control group, an ibuprofen group, an acetazolamide group, a methazolamide group, an ibuprofen/methazolamide combination group, and a high-dose ibuprofen/methazolamide combination group. After the assigned drug was taken for three days at a lower elevation (300 m), the participants ascended to a plateau environment at 5050 m. The Lake Louise AMS Score (LLS) system was used to diagnose and evaluate the AMS rates of the mountaineers in each group, and the results were compared through statistical analysis.

Results: The results show that all the medications tested herein were effective in preventing AMS, but their level of effectiveness varied. The prevalence of AMS was 50.00% in the control group, 14.29% in the ibuprofen group, 5.56% in the acetazolamide group, 27.27% in the methazolamide group, 44.8% in the ibuprofen and methazolamide group, and 22.50% in the high-dose ibuprofen and methazolamide group. Acetazolamide demonstrated a significant prophylactic effect on symptoms related to AMS diagnosis, and ibuprofen showed the best efficacy for preventing headache.

Conclusion: Acetazolamide remains an effective medicine for preventing AMS. Ibuprofen combined with methazolamide is less effective than ibuprofen alone to prevent AMS.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-12002219

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲硝唑酰胺联合布洛芬治疗急性晕山症的疗效
目的:进入高原山地时,人们有可能患上急性高山症(AMS),而目前可用于预防的药物有限。本研究旨在探讨布洛芬、乙酰唑胺和甲唑胺在预防急性登山病方面的有效性,并为今后相关药物的开发提供有价值的见解。 研究方法本研究共招募了 137 名登山者,并将其分为六组:对照组、布洛芬组、乙酰唑胺组、甲唑酰胺组、布洛芬/甲唑酰胺联合组以及大剂量布洛芬/甲唑酰胺联合组。参与者在海拔较低(300 米)的地方服用指定药物三天后,登上海拔 5050 米的高原环境。采用路易斯湖 AMS 评分(LLS)系统对各组登山者的 AMS 发生率进行诊断和评估,并通过统计分析对结果进行比较。 结果显示结果显示,本文测试的所有药物都能有效预防 AMS,但有效程度各不相同。在对照组中,AMS 的发生率为 50.00%,布洛芬组为 14.29%,乙酰脞胺组为 5.56%,甲脞胺组为 27.27%,布洛芬和甲脞胺组为 44.8%,大剂量布洛芬和甲脞胺组为 22.50%。乙酰唑胺对确诊急性颅内压增高症的相关症状有显著的预防作用,而布洛芬对预防头痛的疗效最好。 结论乙酰唑胺仍是预防急性颅内压增高症的有效药物。布洛芬联合甲氮唑酰胺预防AMS的效果不如单独使用布洛芬。 试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:ChiCTR-TRC-12002219
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
期刊最新文献
Potential Role of APC Mutations in the Prognosis and Targeted Therapy of Gastric Adenocarcinoma The Evaluation for Expandable Applications of Tislelizumab in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer The Efficacy of Methazolamide Combined With Ibuprofen for Treating Acute Mountain Sickness Protein Kinase Inhibitors Indicated for Lung Cancer: Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Adverse Drug Reactions, and Evaluation in Clinical Trials Baseline ANA and Anti-Ro60/SSA Antibody as Potential Predictors for Immunogenicity and Poor EULAR Response in Adalimumab-Treated RA Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1