Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Its Association With Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1155/jcpt/6643853
Ganesh Bushi, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Suhas Ballal, Pooja Bansal, Balvir S. Tomar, Ayash Ashraf, M. Ravi Kumar, Aashna Sinha, Pramod Rawat, Abhay M. Gaidhane, Sanjit Sah, Hashem Abu Serhan, Mahendra Pratap Singh, Muhammed Shabil
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Its Association With Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Ganesh Bushi,&nbsp;Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib,&nbsp;Suhas Ballal,&nbsp;Pooja Bansal,&nbsp;Balvir S. Tomar,&nbsp;Ayash Ashraf,&nbsp;M. Ravi Kumar,&nbsp;Aashna Sinha,&nbsp;Pramod Rawat,&nbsp;Abhay M. Gaidhane,&nbsp;Sanjit Sah,&nbsp;Hashem Abu Serhan,&nbsp;Mahendra Pratap Singh,&nbsp;Muhammed Shabil","doi":"10.1155/jcpt/6643853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Asthma is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition marked by airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, significantly impacting quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and an increased risk of asthma. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the relationship between PPI use and the development or exacerbation of asthma.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted, covering studies published from the inception of the database to July 12, 2024. Observational studies examining the association between PPI use and asthma risk were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data using Nested Knowledge software, with study quality assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, pooling odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) to assess the association, with heterogeneity evaluated via the <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> statistic.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Fourteen studies, conducted between 2009 and 2024 and involving over 1.7 million participants, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled HR showed a 38% increased risk of asthma among PPI users compared to nonusers (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.62). OR analysis indicated a 29% higher risk (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23–1.35). PPI users had an 81% higher risk compared to histamine H<sub>2</sub> receptor antagonist (H<sub>2</sub>RA) users (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09–2.53), and asthma patients using PPIs were 61% more likely to experience exacerbations (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.42–1.80).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> PPI use is associated with an increased risk of asthma. These findings underscore the need for cautious prescribing and further investigation into underlying mechanisms.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/jcpt/6643853","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jcpt/6643853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a prevalent chronic respiratory condition marked by airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness, significantly impacting quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests a potential association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and an increased risk of asthma. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the relationship between PPI use and the development or exacerbation of asthma.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted, covering studies published from the inception of the database to July 12, 2024. Observational studies examining the association between PPI use and asthma risk were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data using Nested Knowledge software, with study quality assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, pooling odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) to assess the association, with heterogeneity evaluated via the I2 statistic.

Results: Fourteen studies, conducted between 2009 and 2024 and involving over 1.7 million participants, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled HR showed a 38% increased risk of asthma among PPI users compared to nonusers (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.14–1.62). OR analysis indicated a 29% higher risk (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23–1.35). PPI users had an 81% higher risk compared to histamine H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) users (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09–2.53), and asthma patients using PPIs were 61% more likely to experience exacerbations (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.42–1.80).

Conclusion: PPI use is associated with an increased risk of asthma. These findings underscore the need for cautious prescribing and further investigation into underlying mechanisms.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子泵抑制剂的使用及其与哮喘的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:哮喘是一种常见的慢性呼吸道疾病,以气道炎症和高反应性为特征,严重影响生活质量。新出现的证据表明质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用与哮喘风险增加之间存在潜在关联。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了PPI使用与哮喘发展或恶化之间的关系。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Embase数据库,检索自该数据库建立至2024年7月12日发表的研究。观察性研究检查了PPI使用与哮喘风险之间的关系。两位审稿人使用嵌套知识软件独立提取数据,并通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。进行随机效应荟萃分析,汇集优势比(ORs)和风险比(hr)来评估相关性,并通过I2统计量评估异质性。结果:2009年至2024年间进行的14项研究,涉及170多万参与者,符合纳入标准。综合风险比显示,与非PPI使用者相比,PPI使用者哮喘风险增加38%(风险比,1.38;95% ci, 1.14-1.62)。OR分析显示风险增加29% (OR, 1.29;95% ci, 1.23-1.35)。与组胺H2受体拮抗剂(H2RA)使用者相比,PPI使用者的风险高出81% (HR, 1.81;95% CI, 1.09-2.53),使用PPIs的哮喘患者出现急性发作的可能性增加61% (OR, 1.61;95% ci, 1.42-1.80)。结论:PPI的使用与哮喘风险增加有关。这些发现强调了谨慎处方和进一步调查潜在机制的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
期刊最新文献
Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Voriconazole-Induced Liver Injury in Chinese Lung Transplant Patients Evaluating the Real-World Safety of Ravulizumab in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Insights From a Detailed Analysis of FAERS Data Assessment of the Role of the Pharmacy Staff in Undiagnosed Skin Problems Using Virtual Patient Profiles Research on the Side Effects of Intravenous Methylprednisolone in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Neurological Diseases Lippia citriodora Essential Oils Induce Cytotoxicity and Modify Transcription Levels of Bcl-2, Bax, p53, and c-Jun Genes in Breast Cancer Cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1