Absolute Quantification of Glutathione Using Top-Hat Optics for IR-MALDESI Mass Spectrometry Imaging

IF 1.9 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Mass Spectrometry Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1002/jms.5091
Emily R. Bruce, Russell R. Kibbe, Emily C. Hector, David C. Muddiman
{"title":"Absolute Quantification of Glutathione Using Top-Hat Optics for IR-MALDESI Mass Spectrometry Imaging","authors":"Emily R. Bruce,&nbsp;Russell R. Kibbe,&nbsp;Emily C. Hector,&nbsp;David C. Muddiman","doi":"10.1002/jms.5091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI) uses an infrared laser to desorb neutral biomolecules with postionization via ESI at atmospheric pressure. The Gaussian profile of the laser with conventional optics results in the heating of adjacent nonablated tissue due to the energy profile being circular. A diffractive optical element (DOE) was incorporated into the optical train to correct for this disadvantage. The DOE produces a top-hat beam profile and square ablation spots, which have uniform energy distributions. Although beneficial to mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), it is unknown how the DOE affects the ability to perform quantitative MSI (qMSI). In this work, we evaluate the performance of the DOE optical train against our conventional optics to define the potential advantages of the top-hat beam profile. Absolute quantification of glutathione (GSH) was achieved by normalizing the analyte of interest to homoglutathione (hGSH), spotting a dilution series of stable isotope labeled glutathione (SIL-GSH), and analyzing by IR-MALDESI MSI with either the conventional optical train or with the DOE incorporated. Statistical comparison indicates that there was no significant difference between the quantification of GSH by the two optical trains as evidenced by similar calibration curves. Results support that both optical trains can be used for qMSI without a change in the ability to carry out absolute quantification but providing the benefits of the top-hat optical train (i.e., flat energy profile and square ablation spots)—for future qMSI studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jms.5091","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.5091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (IR-MALDESI) uses an infrared laser to desorb neutral biomolecules with postionization via ESI at atmospheric pressure. The Gaussian profile of the laser with conventional optics results in the heating of adjacent nonablated tissue due to the energy profile being circular. A diffractive optical element (DOE) was incorporated into the optical train to correct for this disadvantage. The DOE produces a top-hat beam profile and square ablation spots, which have uniform energy distributions. Although beneficial to mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), it is unknown how the DOE affects the ability to perform quantitative MSI (qMSI). In this work, we evaluate the performance of the DOE optical train against our conventional optics to define the potential advantages of the top-hat beam profile. Absolute quantification of glutathione (GSH) was achieved by normalizing the analyte of interest to homoglutathione (hGSH), spotting a dilution series of stable isotope labeled glutathione (SIL-GSH), and analyzing by IR-MALDESI MSI with either the conventional optical train or with the DOE incorporated. Statistical comparison indicates that there was no significant difference between the quantification of GSH by the two optical trains as evidenced by similar calibration curves. Results support that both optical trains can be used for qMSI without a change in the ability to carry out absolute quantification but providing the benefits of the top-hat optical train (i.e., flat energy profile and square ablation spots)—for future qMSI studies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用顶帽光学技术进行红外-MALDESI 质谱成像,实现谷胱甘肽的绝对定量
红外基质辅助激光解吸电喷雾离子化(IR-MALDESI)利用红外激光解吸中性生物大分子,并在大气压下通过ESI进行后电离。由于能量曲线呈环形,传统光学器件的激光高斯曲线会导致加热邻近的非消融组织。为了纠正这一缺点,我们在光学系统中加入了衍射光学元件(DOE)。衍射光学元件产生了顶帽光束轮廓和方形烧蚀点,这些烧蚀点具有均匀的能量分布。虽然 DOE 有利于质谱成像(MSI),但 DOE 如何影响定量 MSI(qMSI)的能力尚不清楚。在这项工作中,我们评估了 DOE 光学系统与传统光学系统的性能,以确定顶帽光束轮廓的潜在优势。谷胱甘肽(GSH)的绝对定量是通过将相关分析物归一化为同型谷胱甘肽(hGSH),对稳定同位素标记的谷胱甘肽(SIL-GSH)稀释系列进行定点,然后使用传统光学系统或结合 DOE 的 IR-MALDESI MSI 进行分析实现的。统计比较结果表明,两种光学方法对谷胱甘肽的定量没有明显差异,相似的校准曲线也证明了这一点。研究结果表明,两种光学序列都可用于 qMSI,但绝对定量的能力不会改变,同时还能提供顶帽光学序列的优点(即平坦的能量曲线和方形烧蚀点)--供未来的 qMSI 研究使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry
Journal of Mass Spectrometry 化学-光谱学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mass Spectrometry publishes papers on a broad range of topics of interest to scientists working in both fundamental and applied areas involving the study of gaseous ions. The aim of JMS is to serve the scientific community with information provided and arranged to help senior investigators to better stay abreast of new discoveries and studies in their own field, to make them aware of events and developments in associated fields, and to provide students and newcomers the basic tools with which to learn fundamental and applied aspects of mass spectrometry.
期刊最新文献
Advancing Native Mass Spectrometry Toward Cellular Biology Strategies for Top–Down Hydrogen Deuterium Exchange-Mass Spectrometry: A Mini Review and Perspective B4C-Assisted Paper Spray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Issue Information Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Gatifloxacin and Dexamethasone in Rabbit Ocular Biofluid Using a Sensitive and Selective LC–MS/MS Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1