Patient Consent and The Right to Notice and Explanation of AI Systems Used in Health Care.

Meghan E Hurley,Benjamin H Lang,Kristin Marie Kostick-Quenet,Jared N Smith,Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby
{"title":"Patient Consent and The Right to Notice and Explanation of AI Systems Used in Health Care.","authors":"Meghan E Hurley,Benjamin H Lang,Kristin Marie Kostick-Quenet,Jared N Smith,Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2024.2399828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the need for enforceable guardrails for artificial intelligence (AI) that protect the public and allow for innovation, the U.S. Government recently issued a Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights which outlines five principles of safe AI design, use, and implementation. One in particular, the right to notice and explanation, requires accurately informing the public about the use of AI that impacts them in ways that are easy to understand. Yet, in the healthcare setting, it is unclear what goal the right to notice and explanation serves, and the moral importance of patient-level disclosure. We propose three normative functions of this right: (1) to notify patients about their care, (2) to educate patients and promote trust, and (3) to meet standards for informed consent. Additional clarity is needed to guide practices that respect the right to notice and explanation of AI in healthcare while providing meaningful benefits to patients.","PeriodicalId":501008,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2399828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the need for enforceable guardrails for artificial intelligence (AI) that protect the public and allow for innovation, the U.S. Government recently issued a Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights which outlines five principles of safe AI design, use, and implementation. One in particular, the right to notice and explanation, requires accurately informing the public about the use of AI that impacts them in ways that are easy to understand. Yet, in the healthcare setting, it is unclear what goal the right to notice and explanation serves, and the moral importance of patient-level disclosure. We propose three normative functions of this right: (1) to notify patients about their care, (2) to educate patients and promote trust, and (3) to meet standards for informed consent. Additional clarity is needed to guide practices that respect the right to notice and explanation of AI in healthcare while providing meaningful benefits to patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健中使用的人工智能系统的患者同意权和知情权及解释权。
鉴于有必要为人工智能(AI)制定可强制执行的护栏,以保护公众并允许创新,美国政府最近发布了一份《人工智能权利法案蓝图》,其中概述了安全设计、使用和实施人工智能的五项原则。其中,通知和解释权要求以通俗易懂的方式向公众准确告知影响他们的人工智能使用情况。然而,在医疗保健领域,通知权和解释权的目标是什么,以及患者层面的信息披露在道德上的重要性尚不明确。我们提出了这项权利的三个规范性功能:(1)通知患者有关其护理的信息;(2)教育患者并增进信任;(3)满足知情同意的标准。我们需要进一步澄清,以指导在医疗保健中尊重人工智能通知权和解释权的实践,同时为患者提供有意义的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Allocation of Treatment Slots in Elective Mental Health Care-Are Waiting Lists the Ethically Most Appropriate Option? Errors, Omissions, and Pediatric Gender Medicine. The Ethical Standard for End-of-Life Decisions for Unrepresented Patients. How Does the Categorical System Account for Socioeconomic Background and Embodied Advantage? A Policy Development Dialogue. Patients with Limited English Proficiency: Legal Mandates for Language Assistance Services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1