Mixed-Ownership Reform and Innovation: An Examination of State-Owned Enterprises

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3454715
Haiping Fu;Saixing Zeng;Daxin Sun;Jiawei Lin
{"title":"Mixed-Ownership Reform and Innovation: An Examination of State-Owned Enterprises","authors":"Haiping Fu;Saixing Zeng;Daxin Sun;Jiawei Lin","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3454715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior literature on ownership suggests that in the majority of cases, state ownership in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is not an optimal structure for firm performance, especially in emerging economies. Mixed-ownership structures are designed to overcome this disadvantage. However, their impacts on innovation are not well understood. We examine whether and how SOEs’ innovation efforts benefit from mixed-ownership reform, using a sample of 375 publicly listed SOEs operating in China between 2003 and 2019. We discuss principal–principal and principal–agent conflicts in SOEs and argue that the increase in managerial autonomy that accompanies mixed-ownership reform releases SOEs from state control and orients them toward engagement with market forces, encouraging higher levels of innovation. Our results suggest that both the frequency and the impact of innovation in SOEs are improved by mixed-ownership reform. We further find that this relationship is more pronounced when SOEs are affiliated with the central government, and it is strengthened through an anticorruption policy. This study provides fresh insights into the role of mixed-ownership reform in emerging economies.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"14450-14471"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10666696/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior literature on ownership suggests that in the majority of cases, state ownership in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is not an optimal structure for firm performance, especially in emerging economies. Mixed-ownership structures are designed to overcome this disadvantage. However, their impacts on innovation are not well understood. We examine whether and how SOEs’ innovation efforts benefit from mixed-ownership reform, using a sample of 375 publicly listed SOEs operating in China between 2003 and 2019. We discuss principal–principal and principal–agent conflicts in SOEs and argue that the increase in managerial autonomy that accompanies mixed-ownership reform releases SOEs from state control and orients them toward engagement with market forces, encouraging higher levels of innovation. Our results suggest that both the frequency and the impact of innovation in SOEs are improved by mixed-ownership reform. We further find that this relationship is more pronounced when SOEs are affiliated with the central government, and it is strengthened through an anticorruption policy. This study provides fresh insights into the role of mixed-ownership reform in emerging economies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合所有制改革与创新:国有企业研究
先前有关所有权的文献表明,在大多数情况下,国有企业(SOEs)中的国家所有权并不是企业绩效的最佳结构,尤其是在新兴经济体中。混合所有制结构旨在克服这一劣势。然而,人们对混合所有制对创新的影响还不甚了解。我们以 2003 年至 2019 年间在中国运营的 375 家上市国有企业为样本,研究了国有企业的创新努力是否以及如何受益于混合所有制改革。我们讨论了国有企业中的委托人-委托人冲突和委托人-代理人冲突,并认为伴随混合所有制改革而来的管理自主权的增加将国有企业从国家控制中解放出来,并使其转向参与市场力量,从而鼓励更高水平的创新。我们的研究结果表明,混合所有制改革提高了国有企业创新的频率和影响。我们进一步发现,当国有企业隶属于中央政府时,这种关系会更加明显,而通过反腐政策,这种关系会得到加强。本研究为混合所有制改革在新兴经济体中的作用提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Catch-Up in Complex Products and Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry A Decision Framework With q-Rung Fuzzy Preferences for Ranking Barriers Affecting Clean Energy Utilization Within Healthcare Industry Can the Input of Data Elements Improve Manufacturing Productivity? Effect Measurement and Path Analysis A Taxonomy-Based Data Model for Assessing Engineering Skills in an Organizational Context Modeling and Simulation Analysis of Influencing Factors of MES Implementation in Zero Defect Management Enterprises in Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1