In-hospital course of patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction in the DELIVER trial

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1002/ejhf.3410
Maria A. Pabon, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L. Claggett, Safia Chatur, Sara Siqueira, Pablo Marti-Castellote, Rudolf A. de Boer, Adrian F. Hernandez, Silvio E. Inzucchi, Mikhail N. Kosiborod, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Felipe Martinez, Sanjiv J. Shah, Akshay S. Desai, Pardeep S. Jhund, John J.V. McMurray, Scott D. Solomon, Orly Vardeny
{"title":"In-hospital course of patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction in the DELIVER trial","authors":"Maria A. Pabon,&nbsp;Muthiah Vaduganathan,&nbsp;Brian L. Claggett,&nbsp;Safia Chatur,&nbsp;Sara Siqueira,&nbsp;Pablo Marti-Castellote,&nbsp;Rudolf A. de Boer,&nbsp;Adrian F. Hernandez,&nbsp;Silvio E. Inzucchi,&nbsp;Mikhail N. Kosiborod,&nbsp;Carolyn S.P. Lam,&nbsp;Felipe Martinez,&nbsp;Sanjiv J. Shah,&nbsp;Akshay S. Desai,&nbsp;Pardeep S. Jhund,&nbsp;John J.V. McMurray,&nbsp;Scott D. Solomon,&nbsp;Orly Vardeny","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) may face residual risks of clinical events that are comparable to those experienced by patients with HF whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has consistently been above 40%. However, little is known about the clinical course of patients with HFimpEF during hospitalization for HF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and results</h3>\n \n <p>DELIVER randomized patients with HF and LVEF &gt;40% to dapagliflozin or placebo, including HFimpEF (LVEF previously ≤40%). We evaluated all HF hospitalizations adjudicated by the clinical endpoints committee with available data for determination of in-hospital course. Complicated hospitalization was defined as any hospitalization requiring intensive care unit stay, intravenous vasopressors/inotropes/vasodilators, invasive or non-invasive ventilation, mechanical fluid removal, ultrafiltration, or mechanical circulatory support. LVEF changes were extracted using a validated GPT-3.5, a large language model, via a secure private endpoint. Of the 6263 patients enrolled in DELIVER, 1151 (18%) had HFimpEF. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, there were 224 total HF hospitalizations in 144 patients with HFimpEF and 985 in 603 patients with LVEF consistently &gt;40%. Patients with HFimpEF experienced higher rates of complicated HF hospitalization as compared with patients with LVEF consistently &gt;40% (39% vs. 27%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Among those who experienced a first HF hospitalization, there was no significant difference in length of stay or in-hospital mortality between patients with HFimpEF versus LVEF consistently &gt;40%. In a subset of participants who had at least one LVEF measurement available during HF hospitalization, 66% of those with HFimpEF and 29% of patients with LVEF consistently &gt;40% experienced a reduction in their LVEF to ≤40% from the time of enrolment (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). In the entire DELIVER cohort, dapagliflozin reduced total uncomplicated and complicated HF hospitalizations, irrespective of HFimpEF status (<i>p</i><sub>interaction</sub> ≥0.30).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among patients hospitalized for HF in DELIVER, those with HFimpEF experienced a more adverse in-hospital clinical course, necessitating higher resource utilization beyond standard diuretic therapy compared with patients with HF and LVEF consistently &gt;40%, but had similar in-hospital mortality. Treatment benefits of dapagliflozin were not modified by hospitalization type.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"26 12","pages":"2532-2540"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.3410","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejhf.3410","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Patients with heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) may face residual risks of clinical events that are comparable to those experienced by patients with HF whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has consistently been above 40%. However, little is known about the clinical course of patients with HFimpEF during hospitalization for HF.

Methods and results

DELIVER randomized patients with HF and LVEF >40% to dapagliflozin or placebo, including HFimpEF (LVEF previously ≤40%). We evaluated all HF hospitalizations adjudicated by the clinical endpoints committee with available data for determination of in-hospital course. Complicated hospitalization was defined as any hospitalization requiring intensive care unit stay, intravenous vasopressors/inotropes/vasodilators, invasive or non-invasive ventilation, mechanical fluid removal, ultrafiltration, or mechanical circulatory support. LVEF changes were extracted using a validated GPT-3.5, a large language model, via a secure private endpoint. Of the 6263 patients enrolled in DELIVER, 1151 (18%) had HFimpEF. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, there were 224 total HF hospitalizations in 144 patients with HFimpEF and 985 in 603 patients with LVEF consistently >40%. Patients with HFimpEF experienced higher rates of complicated HF hospitalization as compared with patients with LVEF consistently >40% (39% vs. 27%; p < 0.001). Among those who experienced a first HF hospitalization, there was no significant difference in length of stay or in-hospital mortality between patients with HFimpEF versus LVEF consistently >40%. In a subset of participants who had at least one LVEF measurement available during HF hospitalization, 66% of those with HFimpEF and 29% of patients with LVEF consistently >40% experienced a reduction in their LVEF to ≤40% from the time of enrolment (p < 0.001). In the entire DELIVER cohort, dapagliflozin reduced total uncomplicated and complicated HF hospitalizations, irrespective of HFimpEF status (pinteraction ≥0.30).

Conclusions

Among patients hospitalized for HF in DELIVER, those with HFimpEF experienced a more adverse in-hospital clinical course, necessitating higher resource utilization beyond standard diuretic therapy compared with patients with HF and LVEF consistently >40%, but had similar in-hospital mortality. Treatment benefits of dapagliflozin were not modified by hospitalization type.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DELIVER 试验中射血分数改善型心力衰竭患者的住院治疗过程
射血分数改善的心力衰竭(HF)患者可能会面临与左室射血分数(LVEF)始终高于 40% 的心力衰竭患者相当的临床事件残余风险。然而,人们对 HFimpEF 患者在因 HF 住院期间的临床过程知之甚少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
What's new in heart failure? November 2025 Contemporary medical therapy for heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry. Pharmacologic pitfalls in heart failure: A guide to drugs that may cause or exacerbate heart failure. A European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus document. Combination diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mesenchymal precursor cells reduce mortality and major morbidity in ischaemic heart failure with inflammation: DREAM-HF.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1