首页 > 最新文献

European Journal of Heart Failure最新文献

英文 中文
What's new in heart failure? November 2025 心力衰竭有什么新进展?2025年11月
IF 18.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2026-01-04 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70089
Mert Tokcan, Julian Hoevelmann, Philipp Markwirth, Bernhard Haring

In this column, we want to provide clinicians and researchers with short and concise summaries of recently published studies in the European Journal of Heart Failure that we think may be of particular relevance to heart failure (HF) specialists (Figure 1). Key topics of this issue include characteristics and outcomes of patients with HF and history of malignancy, echocardiographic phenotyping of cardiac wasting in advanced cancer patients, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan for primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in early breast cancer and the associations between centre volume and cardiogenic shock (CS) outcomes in Germany.

Details are in the caption following the image
Figure 1
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
The month in heart failure – November 2025. CI, confidence interval; CS, cardiogenic shock; CTRCD, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction; GLS, global longitudinal strain; HR, hazard ratio; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
在本专栏中,我们希望为临床医生和研究人员提供最近发表在《欧洲心力衰竭杂志》上的研究的简短总结,我们认为这些研究可能与心力衰竭(HF)专家特别相关(图1)。这期的主要主题包括心衰和恶性肿瘤病史患者的特征和结局、晚期癌症患者心脏衰竭的超声心动图表型、沙比利/缬沙坦对早期乳腺癌癌症治疗相关性心功能障碍(CTRCD)的一级预防作用以及德国中心容积与心源性休克(CS)结局之间的关系。心脏衰竭的月份- 2025年11月。CI,置信区间;CS,心源性休克;CTRCD,癌症治疗相关性心功能障碍;GLS,全局纵向应变;HR:风险比;LV,左心室;LVEF,左室射血分数;MCS:机械循环支架;TAPSE,三尖瓣环状平面收缩偏移。
{"title":"What's new in heart failure? November 2025","authors":"Mert Tokcan, Julian Hoevelmann, Philipp Markwirth, Bernhard Haring","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70089","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this column, we want to provide clinicians and researchers with short and concise summaries of recently published studies in the <i>European Journal of Heart Failure</i> that we think may be of particular relevance to heart failure (HF) specialists (<i>Figure</i> 1). Key topics of this issue include characteristics and outcomes of patients with HF and history of malignancy, echocardiographic phenotyping of cardiac wasting in advanced cancer patients, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan for primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in early breast cancer and the associations between centre volume and cardiogenic shock (CS) outcomes in Germany.</p>\u0000<figure><picture>\u0000<source media=\"(min-width: 1650px)\" srcset=\"/cms/asset/c99bd49c-a9e0-481d-bce2-84f923df34eb/ejhf70089-fig-0001-m.jpg\"/><img alt=\"Details are in the caption following the image\" data-lg-src=\"/cms/asset/c99bd49c-a9e0-481d-bce2-84f923df34eb/ejhf70089-fig-0001-m.jpg\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"/cms/asset/8d789b1e-ed00-4af5-b13f-1fde6df78394/ejhf70089-fig-0001-m.png\" title=\"Details are in the caption following the image\"/></picture><figcaption>\u0000<div><strong>Figure 1<span style=\"font-weight:normal\"></span></strong><div>Open in figure viewer<i aria-hidden=\"true\"></i><span>PowerPoint</span></div>\u0000</div>\u0000<div>The month in heart failure – November 2025. CI, confidence interval; CS, cardiogenic shock; CTRCD, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction; GLS, global longitudinal strain; HR, hazard ratio; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.</div>\u0000</figcaption>\u0000</figure>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145893995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contemporary medical therapy for heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry. 当代医学治疗心力衰竭的射血分数谱:optipharmh - hf登记。
IF 18.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70074
Riccardo M Inciardi,Maurizio Volterrani,Gianluigi Savarese,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Chiara Oriecuia,Carlo M Lombardi,Cristina Gussago,Piergiuseppe Agostoni,Pietro Ameri,Giuseppe Armentaro,Chiara Arzilli,Nadia Aspromonte,Andrea Attanasio,Roberto Badagliacca,Lucia Barbieri,Pier Paolo Bocchino,Francesca Bursi,Matteo Cameli,Martino Canonero,Jeness S Campodonico,Teresa Capovilla,Erberto Carluccio,Stefano Carugo,Vincenzo Castiglione,Dario Catapano,Manlio Cipriani,Michele Correale,Domenico D'Amario,Raffaele De Caterina,Gaetano M De Ferrari,Emilia D'Elia,Luca Di Odoardo,Michele Emdin,Luigi Falco,Giulia Ferrante,Alessandra Fornaro,Paolo Fornaro,Gionata Guastamiglio,Marco Guazzi,Massimo Iacoviello,Massimo Imazio,Enrico Incaminato,Maria Teresa La Rovere,Sergio Leonardi,Marta Maccallini,Giulia E Mandoli,Daniele Masarone,Marco Masetti,Alberto Mazzoni,Marta Mazzotta,Marco Merlo,Luigi Moschini,Filippo Novarese,Alberto Palazzuoli,Maria C Pastore,Giuseppe Patti,Roberto F E Pedretti,Stefano Pidello,Massimo F Piepoli,Giuseppe Pinto,Luciano Potena,Claudia Raineri,Filippo M Rubbo,Mario Sabatino,Andrea Salzano,Angela Sciacqua,Michele Senni,Paolo Severino,Gianfranco Sinagra,Barbara Sposato,Stefano Taddei,Alessandro Valleggi,Carlo Vignati,Dario Vizza,Claudia Specchia,Giuseppe Rosano,Marco Metra,
AIMSDespite guideline recommendations, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains underused and underdosed in patients with heart failure (HF) across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum. The aim of this study was to evaluate GDMT use, dosing, and implementation in a contemporary, nationwide HF cohort.METHODS AND RESULTSThe OPTIPHARM-HF (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicentre, observational study enrolling adult patients with HF, across 32 Italian HF centres. Clinical characteristics, medical therapy prevalence and change after first visit have been assessed in patients with reduced (HFrEF: EF ≤40%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF: EF 40-49%), and preserved EF (HFpEF: EF ≥50%). From September 2022 to December 2024, 3054 patients (mean age 69 ± 12 years, 25% female) were enrolled: 56% with HFrEF, 21% with HFmrEF, and 23% with HFpEF. Among HFrEF, prescription frequencies were: 90% for beta-blockers; 19% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB); 61% for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); 72% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA); and 69% for sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Less than 60% achieved ≥50% of target doses. Quadruple therapy was received by 47% of the patients. After first visit, there was an increase in prescription of all classes of drugs, and titration to quadruple therapy was attained in 64% (p < 0.001). Among HFmrEF, 88% were on beta-blockers, 34% on ACEi/ARB, 49% on ARNI, 63% on MRA, and 59% on SGLT2i. In the HFpEF group, 76% were on beta-blockers, 49% on ACEi/ARB, 18% on ARNI, 49% on MRA and 40% on SGLT2i. After the first visit, SGLT2i prescription significantly increased both in HFmrEF (74%, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (54%, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSUse of GDMT remains suboptimal across the EF spectrum although the adoption of quadruple GDMT in HFrEF and of SGLT2i in HFmrEF and HFpEF increased in recent years.
目的:尽管有指南推荐,但在射血分数(EF)范围内心力衰竭(HF)患者中,指南导向药物治疗(GDMT)的使用和剂量仍然不足。本研究的目的是评估GDMT在当代全国心衰队列中的使用、剂量和实施情况。方法和结果optipharma -HF (NCT06192524)是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,招募了32个意大利心衰中心的成年心衰患者。评估了EF降低(HFrEF: EF≤40%)、轻度降低(HFmrEF: EF 40-49%)和保留EF (HFpEF: EF≥50%)患者的临床特征、药物治疗的流行程度和首次就诊后的变化。从2022年9月至2024年12月,共纳入3054例患者(平均年龄69±12岁,25%为女性):HFrEF患者占56%,HFmrEF患者占21%,HFpEF患者占23%。在HFrEF中,处方频率为:阻滞剂90%;19%为血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB);血管紧张素受体-络霉素抑制剂(ARNI)占61%;72%为矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA);钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)为69%。不到60%达到了≥50%的目标剂量。47%的患者接受了四联疗法。首次就诊后,所有类别药物的处方都有所增加,64%的患者达到了四联治疗的滴定(p < 0.001)。在HFmrEF中,88%的患者使用β受体阻滞剂,34%的患者使用ACEi/ARB, 49%的患者使用ARNI, 63%的患者使用MRA, 59%的患者使用SGLT2i。在HFpEF组中,76%的患者使用β受体阻滞剂,49%的患者使用ACEi/ARB, 18%的患者使用ARNI, 49%的患者使用MRA, 40%的患者使用SGLT2i。首次就诊后,SGLT2i处方HFmrEF (74%, p < 0.001)和HFpEF (54%, p < 0.001)均显著增加。结论尽管近年来在hffref中采用四联GDMT,在HFmrEF和HFpEF中采用SGLT2i,但在整个EF谱中,GDMT的使用仍然不是最佳的。
{"title":"Contemporary medical therapy for heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: The OPTIPHARM-HF registry.","authors":"Riccardo M Inciardi,Maurizio Volterrani,Gianluigi Savarese,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Chiara Oriecuia,Carlo M Lombardi,Cristina Gussago,Piergiuseppe Agostoni,Pietro Ameri,Giuseppe Armentaro,Chiara Arzilli,Nadia Aspromonte,Andrea Attanasio,Roberto Badagliacca,Lucia Barbieri,Pier Paolo Bocchino,Francesca Bursi,Matteo Cameli,Martino Canonero,Jeness S Campodonico,Teresa Capovilla,Erberto Carluccio,Stefano Carugo,Vincenzo Castiglione,Dario Catapano,Manlio Cipriani,Michele Correale,Domenico D'Amario,Raffaele De Caterina,Gaetano M De Ferrari,Emilia D'Elia,Luca Di Odoardo,Michele Emdin,Luigi Falco,Giulia Ferrante,Alessandra Fornaro,Paolo Fornaro,Gionata Guastamiglio,Marco Guazzi,Massimo Iacoviello,Massimo Imazio,Enrico Incaminato,Maria Teresa La Rovere,Sergio Leonardi,Marta Maccallini,Giulia E Mandoli,Daniele Masarone,Marco Masetti,Alberto Mazzoni,Marta Mazzotta,Marco Merlo,Luigi Moschini,Filippo Novarese,Alberto Palazzuoli,Maria C Pastore,Giuseppe Patti,Roberto F E Pedretti,Stefano Pidello,Massimo F Piepoli,Giuseppe Pinto,Luciano Potena,Claudia Raineri,Filippo M Rubbo,Mario Sabatino,Andrea Salzano,Angela Sciacqua,Michele Senni,Paolo Severino,Gianfranco Sinagra,Barbara Sposato,Stefano Taddei,Alessandro Valleggi,Carlo Vignati,Dario Vizza,Claudia Specchia,Giuseppe Rosano,Marco Metra, ","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70074","url":null,"abstract":"AIMSDespite guideline recommendations, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains underused and underdosed in patients with heart failure (HF) across the ejection fraction (EF) spectrum. The aim of this study was to evaluate GDMT use, dosing, and implementation in a contemporary, nationwide HF cohort.METHODS AND RESULTSThe OPTIPHARM-HF (NCT06192524) is a prospective, multicentre, observational study enrolling adult patients with HF, across 32 Italian HF centres. Clinical characteristics, medical therapy prevalence and change after first visit have been assessed in patients with reduced (HFrEF: EF ≤40%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF: EF 40-49%), and preserved EF (HFpEF: EF ≥50%). From September 2022 to December 2024, 3054 patients (mean age 69 ± 12 years, 25% female) were enrolled: 56% with HFrEF, 21% with HFmrEF, and 23% with HFpEF. Among HFrEF, prescription frequencies were: 90% for beta-blockers; 19% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB); 61% for angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); 72% for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA); and 69% for sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). Less than 60% achieved ≥50% of target doses. Quadruple therapy was received by 47% of the patients. After first visit, there was an increase in prescription of all classes of drugs, and titration to quadruple therapy was attained in 64% (p < 0.001). Among HFmrEF, 88% were on beta-blockers, 34% on ACEi/ARB, 49% on ARNI, 63% on MRA, and 59% on SGLT2i. In the HFpEF group, 76% were on beta-blockers, 49% on ACEi/ARB, 18% on ARNI, 49% on MRA and 40% on SGLT2i. After the first visit, SGLT2i prescription significantly increased both in HFmrEF (74%, p < 0.001) and HFpEF (54%, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSUse of GDMT remains suboptimal across the EF spectrum although the adoption of quadruple GDMT in HFrEF and of SGLT2i in HFmrEF and HFpEF increased in recent years.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145771273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacologic pitfalls in heart failure: A guide to drugs that may cause or exacerbate heart failure. A European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus document. 心力衰竭的药理学缺陷:可能导致或加重心力衰竭的药物指南。欧洲心力衰竭杂志专家共识文件。
IF 18.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-11 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70087
Amr Abdin,Johann Bauersachs,Magdy Abdelhamid,Suleman Aktaa,Hussam Al Ghorani,Antonio Bayes-Genis,Jan Biegus,Michael Böhm,Javed Butler,Nicolas Girerd,Marco Metra,Wilfried Mullens,Hadi Skouri,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Seif El Hadidi,Giuseppe M C Rosano,Gianluigi Savarese
Heart failure (HF) exerts a global health burden, often complicated by polypharmacy due to the frequent coexistence of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. While guideline-directed medical therapy and devices have significantly improved outcomes, a range of commonly prescribed medications may inadvertently worsen HF or precipitate decompensation. This expert consensus statement provides a comprehensive overview of drugs known to cause or exacerbate HF, offering practical guidance for clinicians to identify and avoid harmful pharmacologic exposures in this vulnerable population. The review examines the pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical evidence, and guideline-based recommendations for several drug classes, including antidiabetic agents (e.g. thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors), antiarrhythmics (particularly Class I and III), calcium channel blockers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antifungals (e.g. itraconazole, amphotericin B), macrolide antibiotics, antihypertensives (e.g. α1-blockers, centrally acting sympatholytics), neurological and psychiatric medications (e.g. carbamazepine, pregabalin, lithium), and selected anaesthetic and anticancer agents such as anthracyclines and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Each section addresses clinical scenarios where these medications may be contraindicated or require close monitoring. Importantly, this document emphasizes the need for individualized therapy, close review of medication regimens, and collaborative care to minimize iatrogenic harm. The goal is to empower clinicians, pharmacists and nurses to optimize HF treatment while reducing the risk of drug-induced deterioration. Awareness of these pharmacologic pitfalls is critical to improving clinical outcomes and minimizing preventable adverse events and HF hospitalizations.
心力衰竭(HF)是一种全球性的健康负担,由于心血管和非心血管合并症的频繁共存,心力衰竭常常因多重用药而复杂化。虽然指南指导的药物治疗和设备显著改善了结果,但一系列常用处方药可能会无意中加重心衰或沉淀代偿。这份专家共识声明提供了已知可导致或加重心衰的药物的全面概述,为临床医生识别和避免在这一脆弱人群中有害的药物暴露提供了实用指导。本综述探讨了几种药物的病理生理机制、临床证据和基于指南的推荐,包括降糖药(如噻唑烷二酮类、二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂)、抗心律失常药(特别是I类和III类)、钙通道阻滞剂、非甾体抗炎药、抗真菌药(如伊曲康唑、两性霉素B)、大环内酯类抗生素、抗高血压药(如α1受体阻滞剂、中枢作用交感神经抑制剂)、神经和精神药物(如卡马西平,普瑞巴林,锂),以及选定的麻醉和抗癌药物,如蒽环类药物和血管内皮生长因子抑制剂。每个部分都说明了这些药物可能禁忌症或需要密切监测的临床情况。重要的是,本文件强调需要个体化治疗,密切审查用药方案,并协作护理,以尽量减少医源性伤害。目标是使临床医生、药剂师和护士能够优化心衰治疗,同时降低药物性恶化的风险。了解这些药理学缺陷对于改善临床结果和减少可预防的不良事件和心衰住院至关重要。
{"title":"Pharmacologic pitfalls in heart failure: A guide to drugs that may cause or exacerbate heart failure. A European Journal of Heart Failure expert consensus document.","authors":"Amr Abdin,Johann Bauersachs,Magdy Abdelhamid,Suleman Aktaa,Hussam Al Ghorani,Antonio Bayes-Genis,Jan Biegus,Michael Böhm,Javed Butler,Nicolas Girerd,Marco Metra,Wilfried Mullens,Hadi Skouri,Muthiah Vaduganathan,Seif El Hadidi,Giuseppe M C Rosano,Gianluigi Savarese","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70087","url":null,"abstract":"Heart failure (HF) exerts a global health burden, often complicated by polypharmacy due to the frequent coexistence of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. While guideline-directed medical therapy and devices have significantly improved outcomes, a range of commonly prescribed medications may inadvertently worsen HF or precipitate decompensation. This expert consensus statement provides a comprehensive overview of drugs known to cause or exacerbate HF, offering practical guidance for clinicians to identify and avoid harmful pharmacologic exposures in this vulnerable population. The review examines the pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical evidence, and guideline-based recommendations for several drug classes, including antidiabetic agents (e.g. thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors), antiarrhythmics (particularly Class I and III), calcium channel blockers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antifungals (e.g. itraconazole, amphotericin B), macrolide antibiotics, antihypertensives (e.g. α1-blockers, centrally acting sympatholytics), neurological and psychiatric medications (e.g. carbamazepine, pregabalin, lithium), and selected anaesthetic and anticancer agents such as anthracyclines and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Each section addresses clinical scenarios where these medications may be contraindicated or require close monitoring. Importantly, this document emphasizes the need for individualized therapy, close review of medication regimens, and collaborative care to minimize iatrogenic harm. The goal is to empower clinicians, pharmacists and nurses to optimize HF treatment while reducing the risk of drug-induced deterioration. Awareness of these pharmacologic pitfalls is critical to improving clinical outcomes and minimizing preventable adverse events and HF hospitalizations.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145728392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combination diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 联合利尿剂治疗急性心力衰竭:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 18.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-10 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70094
Francesco Fioretti,Angelica Praderio,Savina Nodari,Marco Metra,Javed Butler
AIMSCurrent guideline recommendation to use escalating doses of loop diuretics in acute heart failure (AHF) is limited by worsening renal function and by diuretic resistance. There is an unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies to treat these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of different combination diuretic strategies in patients with AHF.METHODS AND RESULTSA systematic search identified 11 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 7517 patients. A combination diuretic strategy was not associated with reduction of all-cause death (relative risk [RR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.07, p = 0.55) or heart failure (HF) events (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.08, p = 0.16), but was associated with more weight loss (mean difference [MD]: -0.96, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.54, p < 0.0001) and diuretic efficiency (weight changes per mean daily loop diuretic dose) (MD: -0.56, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.02, p = 0.04), higher daily urinary output (MD 266.26, 95% CI 47.20-485.32, p = 0.02). Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) administration during hospitalization reduced HF events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.76, p < 0.0001) and the risk of worsening renal function (defined as an increase >0.3 mg/dl of serum creatinine and/or a reduction >50% of the estimated glomerular filtration rate compared with baseline levels) (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, p = 0.03).CONCLUSIONSIn patients with AHF, a combination diuretic strategy improved early decongestion without affecting prognosis. The use of SGLT2i during index hospitalization was associated with an improvement in all-cause mortality and HF events.
目前的指南建议在急性心力衰竭(AHF)中使用不断增加剂量的环状利尿剂,这受到肾功能恶化和利尿剂耐药性的限制。对治疗这些患者的新治疗策略的需求尚未得到满足。本研究的目的是评价不同利尿剂联合治疗AHF患者的疗效和安全性。方法与结果系统检索了11项符合条件的随机对照试验,涉及7517例患者。利尿剂组合策略与降低全因死亡无关(相对危险度(RR) 0.97, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.89 - -1.07, p = 0.55)或心力衰竭(HF)事件(相对危险度0.83,95%可信区间0.64 - -1.08,p = 0.16),但与减肥(平均差(MD): -0.96, 95%可信区间-1.37到-0.54,p 0.3 mg / dl的血清肌酐和/或减少> 50%的肾小球滤过率与基线水平相比)(相对危险度0.69,95%可信区间0.50 - -0.96,p = 0.03)。结论在AHF患者中,联合利尿剂可改善早期去充血,但不影响预后。指数住院期间使用SGLT2i与全因死亡率和心衰事件的改善相关。
{"title":"Combination diuretic therapy in acute heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Francesco Fioretti,Angelica Praderio,Savina Nodari,Marco Metra,Javed Butler","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70094","url":null,"abstract":"AIMSCurrent guideline recommendation to use escalating doses of loop diuretics in acute heart failure (AHF) is limited by worsening renal function and by diuretic resistance. There is an unmet need for novel therapeutic strategies to treat these patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of different combination diuretic strategies in patients with AHF.METHODS AND RESULTSA systematic search identified 11 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 7517 patients. A combination diuretic strategy was not associated with reduction of all-cause death (relative risk [RR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.07, p = 0.55) or heart failure (HF) events (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64-1.08, p = 0.16), but was associated with more weight loss (mean difference [MD]: -0.96, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.54, p < 0.0001) and diuretic efficiency (weight changes per mean daily loop diuretic dose) (MD: -0.56, 95% CI -1.11 to -0.02, p = 0.04), higher daily urinary output (MD 266.26, 95% CI 47.20-485.32, p = 0.02). Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) administration during hospitalization reduced HF events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58-0.76, p < 0.0001) and the risk of worsening renal function (defined as an increase >0.3 mg/dl of serum creatinine and/or a reduction >50% of the estimated glomerular filtration rate compared with baseline levels) (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.96, p = 0.03).CONCLUSIONSIn patients with AHF, a combination diuretic strategy improved early decongestion without affecting prognosis. The use of SGLT2i during index hospitalization was associated with an improvement in all-cause mortality and HF events.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":18.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145710833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to the letter regarding the article 'Sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy with heart failure: Baseline characteristics of the PARACHUTE-HF trial'. 回复关于“Sacubitril/缬沙坦与依那普利治疗慢性Chagas心肌病合并心力衰竭:PARACHUTE-HF试验的基线特征”这篇文章的来信。
IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70062
Luis Eduardo Echeverria, Caroline Demacq, Claudio Gimpelewicz, John J V McMurray, Renato Delascio Lopes
{"title":"Reply to the letter regarding the article 'Sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy with heart failure: Baseline characteristics of the PARACHUTE-HF trial'.","authors":"Luis Eduardo Echeverria, Caroline Demacq, Claudio Gimpelewicz, John J V McMurray, Renato Delascio Lopes","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70062","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejhf.70062","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"3432"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Low-dose digoxin improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure, preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation - the RATE-AF randomized trial. 低剂量地高辛改善心力衰竭、保留射血分数和房颤患者的心功能——RATE-AF随机试验。
IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70022
Karina V Bunting, Asgher Champsi, Simrat K Gill, Khalil Saadeh, A John Camm, Mary Stanbury, Sandra Haynes, Jonathon N Townend, Richard P Steeds, Dipak Kotecha

Aims: To compare the effect of digoxin versus beta-blockers on left ventricular function, in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptoms of heart failure within the RATE-AF randomized trial.

Methods and results: Blinded echocardiograms were performed at baseline and 12-month follow-up using a pre-defined imaging protocol and the index-beat approach. The change in systolic and diastolic function was assessed, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall, 145 patients completed follow-up, with median age 75 years (interquartile range 69-82) and 44% women. In 119 patients with baseline LVEF ≥50%, a significantly greater improvement in systolic function was noted in patients randomized to low-dose digoxin versus beta-blockers: adjusted mean difference for LVEF 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001) and stroke volume 6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037), with no difference in global longitudinal strain (p = 0.11) or any diastolic parameters. There were no significant differences between groups for patients with LVEF 40-49% and <40%. Digoxin reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide compared to beta-blockers (geometric mean difference 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004), improved New York Heart Association functional class (odds ratio [OR] 11.3, 95% CI 4.3-29.8; p < 0.001) and modified European Heart Rhythm Association arrhythmia symptom class (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.36-10.23; p < 0.001), with substantially less adverse events (incident rate ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.31; p < 0.001). There were no interactions between treatment effects and baseline LVEF for these outcomes (interaction p = 0.62, 0.49, 0.07 and 0.13, respectively).

Conclusions: Low-dose digoxin in patients with symptoms of heart failure, preserved LVEF and permanent AF leads to a significantly greater improvement in systolic function compared to treatment with beta-blockers.

目的:在RATE-AF随机试验中,比较地高辛与β受体阻滞剂对永久性心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭患者左心室功能的影响。方法和结果:在基线和12个月的随访中,采用预先定义的成像方案和指数心跳方法进行盲法超声心动图。以左室射血分数(LVEF)分层评估收缩和舒张功能的变化。总体而言,145名患者完成了随访,中位年龄为75岁(四分位数范围为69-82岁),其中44%为女性。在119例基线LVEF≥50%的患者中,随机分配到低剂量地高辛与β受体阻滞剂的患者的收缩功能改善明显更大:LVEF调整后的平均差异为2.3%(95%置信区间[CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001)和卒中容积6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037),总体纵向应变(p = 0.11)或任何舒张参数无差异。LVEF为40-49%的患者组间无显著差异。结论:低剂量地高辛治疗有心衰症状、保留LVEF和永久性房颤的患者比使用受体阻滞剂治疗更能显著改善收缩功能。
{"title":"Low-dose digoxin improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure, preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation - the RATE-AF randomized trial.","authors":"Karina V Bunting, Asgher Champsi, Simrat K Gill, Khalil Saadeh, A John Camm, Mary Stanbury, Sandra Haynes, Jonathon N Townend, Richard P Steeds, Dipak Kotecha","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70022","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejhf.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effect of digoxin versus beta-blockers on left ventricular function, in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptoms of heart failure within the RATE-AF randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Blinded echocardiograms were performed at baseline and 12-month follow-up using a pre-defined imaging protocol and the index-beat approach. The change in systolic and diastolic function was assessed, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall, 145 patients completed follow-up, with median age 75 years (interquartile range 69-82) and 44% women. In 119 patients with baseline LVEF ≥50%, a significantly greater improvement in systolic function was noted in patients randomized to low-dose digoxin versus beta-blockers: adjusted mean difference for LVEF 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001) and stroke volume 6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037), with no difference in global longitudinal strain (p = 0.11) or any diastolic parameters. There were no significant differences between groups for patients with LVEF 40-49% and <40%. Digoxin reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide compared to beta-blockers (geometric mean difference 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004), improved New York Heart Association functional class (odds ratio [OR] 11.3, 95% CI 4.3-29.8; p < 0.001) and modified European Heart Rhythm Association arrhythmia symptom class (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.36-10.23; p < 0.001), with substantially less adverse events (incident rate ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.31; p < 0.001). There were no interactions between treatment effects and baseline LVEF for these outcomes (interaction p = 0.62, 0.49, 0.07 and 0.13, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose digoxin in patients with symptoms of heart failure, preserved LVEF and permanent AF leads to a significantly greater improvement in systolic function compared to treatment with beta-blockers.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"2869-2878"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803603/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144937346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prognostic significance of somatic mutations in myeloid cells of men with chronic heart failure - interaction between loss of Y chromosome and clonal haematopoiesis. 慢性心力衰竭患者骨髓细胞体细胞突变的预后意义——Y染色体缺失与克隆造血之间的相互作用
IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3778
Sebastian Cremer, Moritz von Scheidt, Klara Kirschbaum, Lukas Tombor, Silvia Mas-Peiro, Wesley Abplanalp, Tina Rasper, Akshay Ware, Andrin Schuff, Alexander Berkowitsch, Johannes Krefting, David Leistner, Heribert Schunkert, Thimoteus Speer, Stefanie Dimmeler, Andreas Michael Zeiher

Aims: Age-associated clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has been linked to increased incidence and worse prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF). CHIP arises from somatic mutations in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Mosaic loss of Y chromosome (LOY), the most common somatic mutation in male blood cells, increases with age, drives clonal expansion of myeloid cells, and has been experimentally associated with cardiac fibrosis and heart failure in mice. However, its prognostic value and interplay with CHIP in CHF patients remain unclear.

Methods and results: We analysed 781 male CHF patients across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction to assess the prevalence and prognostic relevance of LOY and the two most common CHIP-driver mutations, DNMT3A and TET2. Both LOY and CHIP mutations increased with age and co-occurred in 27.1% of men >70 years. LOY independently predicted all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The co-occurrence of LOY and DNMT3A/TET2 mutations further increased mortality among CHIP carriers. This detrimental prognostic effect of LOY was confirmed in a validation cohort of HFrEF patients. Single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HFrEF patients with ischaemic heart failure revealed elevated pro-fibrotic signalling in LOY monocytes, characterized by increased inflammatory and remodelling markers (S100A8, TLR2, CLEC4D) and decreased expression of transforming growth factor-β inhibitors (SMAD7, TGIF2). In patients with both LOY and DNMT3A mutations, monocytes showed enhanced pro-inflammatory gene expression, including alarmins (S100A8, HMGB2) and interferon-related genes (IFNGR1, TRIM56, CD84).

Conclusions: Somatic mutations in blood cells-particularly LOY-are associated with increased mortality in male CHF patients, with LOY emerging as an independent prognostic marker.

目的:年龄相关的不确定电位克隆造血(CHIP)与慢性心力衰竭(CHF)的发病率增加和预后恶化有关。CHIP起源于造血干细胞和祖细胞的体细胞突变。Y染色体马赛克缺失(LOY)是男性血细胞中最常见的体细胞突变,随着年龄的增长而增加,驱动骨髓细胞的克隆扩增,并在实验中与小鼠的心脏纤维化和心力衰竭有关。然而,其在CHF患者中的预后价值及其与CHIP的相互作用尚不清楚。方法和结果:我们分析了781例左室射血分数全谱的男性CHF患者,以评估LOY和两种最常见的chip驱动突变DNMT3A和TET2的患病率和预后相关性。LOY和CHIP突变随年龄增长而增加,在70岁以下的男性中共发生27.1%。LOY可独立预测射血分数降低(HFrEF)心力衰竭患者的全因死亡率。LOY和DNMT3A/TET2突变的共同出现进一步增加了CHIP携带者的死亡率。在HFrEF患者的验证队列中证实了LOY的这种有害预后影响。HFrEF合并缺血性心力衰竭患者外周血单核细胞的单细胞RNA测序显示,LOY单核细胞中促纤维化信号传导升高,其特征是炎症和重塑标志物(S100A8、TLR2、cle4d)增加,转化生长因子-β抑制剂(SMAD7、TGIF2)表达降低。在同时具有LOY和DNMT3A突变的患者中,单核细胞表现出增强的促炎基因表达,包括报警基因(S100A8、HMGB2)和干扰素相关基因(IFNGR1、TRIM56、CD84)。结论:血细胞体细胞突变(尤其是LOY)与男性CHF患者死亡率增加有关,LOY已成为一个独立的预后指标。
{"title":"Prognostic significance of somatic mutations in myeloid cells of men with chronic heart failure - interaction between loss of Y chromosome and clonal haematopoiesis.","authors":"Sebastian Cremer, Moritz von Scheidt, Klara Kirschbaum, Lukas Tombor, Silvia Mas-Peiro, Wesley Abplanalp, Tina Rasper, Akshay Ware, Andrin Schuff, Alexander Berkowitsch, Johannes Krefting, David Leistner, Heribert Schunkert, Thimoteus Speer, Stefanie Dimmeler, Andreas Michael Zeiher","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3778","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejhf.3778","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Age-associated clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) has been linked to increased incidence and worse prognosis of chronic heart failure (CHF). CHIP arises from somatic mutations in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Mosaic loss of Y chromosome (LOY), the most common somatic mutation in male blood cells, increases with age, drives clonal expansion of myeloid cells, and has been experimentally associated with cardiac fibrosis and heart failure in mice. However, its prognostic value and interplay with CHIP in CHF patients remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed 781 male CHF patients across the full spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction to assess the prevalence and prognostic relevance of LOY and the two most common CHIP-driver mutations, DNMT3A and TET2. Both LOY and CHIP mutations increased with age and co-occurred in 27.1% of men >70 years. LOY independently predicted all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The co-occurrence of LOY and DNMT3A/TET2 mutations further increased mortality among CHIP carriers. This detrimental prognostic effect of LOY was confirmed in a validation cohort of HFrEF patients. Single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HFrEF patients with ischaemic heart failure revealed elevated pro-fibrotic signalling in LOY monocytes, characterized by increased inflammatory and remodelling markers (S100A8, TLR2, CLEC4D) and decreased expression of transforming growth factor-β inhibitors (SMAD7, TGIF2). In patients with both LOY and DNMT3A mutations, monocytes showed enhanced pro-inflammatory gene expression, including alarmins (S100A8, HMGB2) and interferon-related genes (IFNGR1, TRIM56, CD84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Somatic mutations in blood cells-particularly LOY-are associated with increased mortality in male CHF patients, with LOY emerging as an independent prognostic marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"3219-3234"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803692/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144697152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Residual pulmonary hypertension and clinical outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure patients stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction. 急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者左心室射血分数分层的残余肺动脉高压和临床结局。
IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-04 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3755
Toshikazu D Tanaka, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Ryeonshi Kang, Takashi Kohno, Satoshi Shoji, Toraaki Okuyama, Yuhei Oi, Ayumi Goda, Ryo Nakamaru, Yuji Nagatomo, Mitsunobu Kitamura, Munehisa Sakamoto, Michiru Nomoto, Atsushi Mizuno, Tomohisa Nagoshi, Shun Kohsaka, Tsutomu Yoshikawa

Aims: The precise outcomes for patients with residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) following the optimized treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic association of PH, categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), in hospitalized ADHF patients.

Methods and results: The WET-HF registry is a multicentre, prospective cohort ADHF registry. Patients were classified into four groups according to tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and LVEF. PH was defined as peak TRV >2.8 m/s. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization at 2 years. In total, 1702 patients had nonPH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 689 [40.5%]), PH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 291 [17.1%]), nonPH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 453 [26.6%]), and PH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 269 [15.8%]). A significant difference in the composite endpoint was observed between patients with and without PH (42.3% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction between PH and LVEF. Notably, in the nonPH-HF group, there were significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients with more than 30% B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) improvement and those with less (composite endpoint 27.5% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.001; all-cause mortality 9.4% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.001; HF rehospitalization 20.2% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.001). However, no such difference was evident in the PH-HF group.

Conclusions: The prognostic importance of residual PH was comparable across both HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction patients. While the prognostic significance of BNP improvement on clinical outcomes was attenuated in the presence of residual PH, utilizing residual PH for risk stratification effectively identified patients at increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization following ADHF, irrespective of their LVEF.

目的:急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)优化治疗后残留肺动脉高压(PH)患者的确切结局尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)分类的PH与ADHF住院患者预后的关系。方法和结果:WET-HF登记是一个多中心、前瞻性队列ADHF登记。根据三尖瓣反流速度(TRV)和LVEF将患者分为四组。PH定义为峰值TRV >2.8 m/s。主要终点是全因死亡率和心力衰竭(HF)再住院2年的综合。结论:在射血分数降低和保留的HF患者中,残余PH对预后的重要性是相当的。虽然在存在残留PH的情况下,BNP改善对临床结果的预后意义减弱,但利用残留PH进行风险分层有效地识别出ADHF后死亡和再住院风险增加的患者,无论其LVEF如何。
{"title":"Residual pulmonary hypertension and clinical outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure patients stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction.","authors":"Toshikazu D Tanaka, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Ryeonshi Kang, Takashi Kohno, Satoshi Shoji, Toraaki Okuyama, Yuhei Oi, Ayumi Goda, Ryo Nakamaru, Yuji Nagatomo, Mitsunobu Kitamura, Munehisa Sakamoto, Michiru Nomoto, Atsushi Mizuno, Tomohisa Nagoshi, Shun Kohsaka, Tsutomu Yoshikawa","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3755","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejhf.3755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The precise outcomes for patients with residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) following the optimized treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic association of PH, categorized according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), in hospitalized ADHF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The WET-HF registry is a multicentre, prospective cohort ADHF registry. Patients were classified into four groups according to tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) and LVEF. PH was defined as peak TRV >2.8 m/s. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) rehospitalization at 2 years. In total, 1702 patients had nonPH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 689 [40.5%]), PH-HF with LVEF <50% (n = 291 [17.1%]), nonPH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 453 [26.6%]), and PH-HF with LVEF ≥50% (n = 269 [15.8%]). A significant difference in the composite endpoint was observed between patients with and without PH (42.3% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001), with no significant interaction between PH and LVEF. Notably, in the nonPH-HF group, there were significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients with more than 30% B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) improvement and those with less (composite endpoint 27.5% vs. 41.8%, p < 0.001; all-cause mortality 9.4% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.001; HF rehospitalization 20.2% vs. 32.8%, p = 0.001). However, no such difference was evident in the PH-HF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prognostic importance of residual PH was comparable across both HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction patients. While the prognostic significance of BNP improvement on clinical outcomes was attenuated in the presence of residual PH, utilizing residual PH for risk stratification effectively identified patients at increased risk of mortality and rehospitalization following ADHF, irrespective of their LVEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"3342-3351"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144558553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relevance of residual tricuspid regurgitation for right ventricular reverse remodelling after tricuspid valve intervention in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and right-sided heart failure. 严重三尖瓣反流和右侧心力衰竭患者三尖瓣介入术后残余三尖瓣反流与右心室反向重塑的相关性。
IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3529
Ludwig T Weckbach, Lukas Stolz, Philipp M Doldi, Hannah Glaser, Cecilia Ennin, Michael Kothieringer, Thomas J Stocker, Michael Näbauer, Mohammad Kassar, Sara Bombace, Karl-Patrik Kresoja, Philipp Lurz, Fabien Praz, Holger Thiele, Volker Rudolph, Steffen Massberg, Jörg Hausleiter

Aims: Right ventricular reverse remodelling (RVRR) is linked to improved survival in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and right-sided heart failure who underwent interventional treatment. However, the role of residual TR on RVRR remains unclear. In this analysis the impact of residual TR on RVRR after interventional TR treatment, which was validated by two independent cohorts at four sites using echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, was investigated.

Methods and results: Overall, 253 patients who were treated for severe TR and right-sided heart failure using different treatment modalities (tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair [T-TEER], transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty, orthotopic transcatheter TV replacement [TTVR], heterotopic TTVR) were included. Three-dimensional echocardiographic and CMR-based assessment of RVRR and clinical evaluation of decongestion or exercise capacity were performed at baseline and 30 days after the procedure. Mortality was analysed at 1 year after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI). In patients with residual TR ≤1+ pronounced reduction of right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes was observed. In patients with residual TR ≥2+ the effect of RVRR gradually decreased with higher residual TR reinforcing the relevance of optimal procedural results for RVRR. These findings were validated in two independent cohorts. In contrast to RVRR, residual TR ≤1+ and 2+ were associated with similar 1-year survival. RVRR was only observed after T-TEER or orthotopic TTVR, but not after heterotopic TTVR as expected. However, all three treatment modalities were accompanied by significant decongestion and functional improvement at 30-day follow-up.

Conclusions: In patients with severe TR and right-sided heart failure undergoing TTVI, superior procedural results were associated with more pronounced RVRR.

目的:右心室逆向重塑(RVRR)与接受介入治疗的严重三尖瓣反流(TR)和右侧心衰患者生存率的提高有关。然而,残余 TR 对 RVRR 的作用仍不清楚。本分析调查了介入治疗 TR 后残余 TR 对 RVRR 的影响,四个研究地点的两个独立队列使用超声心动图或心脏磁共振(CMR)成像进行了验证:共纳入了 253 例采用不同治疗方式(三尖瓣经导管边缘到边缘修补术 [T-TEER]、经导管三尖瓣瓣环成形术、正位经导管 TV 置换术 [TTVR]、异位 TTVR)治疗严重 TR 和右侧心衰的患者。在基线和术后 30 天对 RVRR 进行三维超声心动图和基于 CMR 的评估,并对去充血或运动能力进行临床评估。分析了经导管三尖瓣介入术(TTVI)后一年的死亡率。在残余 TR≤1+ 的患者中,观察到右心室舒张末期和收缩末期容积明显缩小。在残余TR≥2+的患者中,随着残余TR的增加,RVRR的效果逐渐减弱,这进一步说明了RVRR与最佳手术效果的相关性。这些发现在两个独立的队列中得到了验证。与RVRR相反,残余TR≤1+和2+与相似的1年生存率相关。只有在T-TEER或正位TTVR后才能观察到RVRR,而在异位TTVR后则无法观察到RVRR。然而,在30天的随访中,所有三种治疗方式都伴有显著的去充血和功能改善:结论:对于接受TTVI治疗的严重TR和右侧心力衰竭患者,卓越的手术效果与更明显的RVRR相关。
{"title":"Relevance of residual tricuspid regurgitation for right ventricular reverse remodelling after tricuspid valve intervention in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and right-sided heart failure.","authors":"Ludwig T Weckbach, Lukas Stolz, Philipp M Doldi, Hannah Glaser, Cecilia Ennin, Michael Kothieringer, Thomas J Stocker, Michael Näbauer, Mohammad Kassar, Sara Bombace, Karl-Patrik Kresoja, Philipp Lurz, Fabien Praz, Holger Thiele, Volker Rudolph, Steffen Massberg, Jörg Hausleiter","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3529","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejhf.3529","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Right ventricular reverse remodelling (RVRR) is linked to improved survival in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and right-sided heart failure who underwent interventional treatment. However, the role of residual TR on RVRR remains unclear. In this analysis the impact of residual TR on RVRR after interventional TR treatment, which was validated by two independent cohorts at four sites using echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Overall, 253 patients who were treated for severe TR and right-sided heart failure using different treatment modalities (tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair [T-TEER], transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty, orthotopic transcatheter TV replacement [TTVR], heterotopic TTVR) were included. Three-dimensional echocardiographic and CMR-based assessment of RVRR and clinical evaluation of decongestion or exercise capacity were performed at baseline and 30 days after the procedure. Mortality was analysed at 1 year after transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI). In patients with residual TR ≤1+ pronounced reduction of right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes was observed. In patients with residual TR ≥2+ the effect of RVRR gradually decreased with higher residual TR reinforcing the relevance of optimal procedural results for RVRR. These findings were validated in two independent cohorts. In contrast to RVRR, residual TR ≤1+ and 2+ were associated with similar 1-year survival. RVRR was only observed after T-TEER or orthotopic TTVR, but not after heterotopic TTVR as expected. However, all three treatment modalities were accompanied by significant decongestion and functional improvement at 30-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with severe TR and right-sided heart failure undergoing TTVI, superior procedural results were associated with more pronounced RVRR.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"3170-3179"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803685/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142724361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to "Use of guideline-recommended medical therapy in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease: from physician's prescriptions to patient's dispensations, medication adherence and persistence". 对“心力衰竭和慢性肾脏疾病患者使用指南推荐药物治疗:从医生处方到患者配药,药物依从性和持久性”的更正。
IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.70016
{"title":"Correction to \"Use of guideline-recommended medical therapy in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease: from physician's prescriptions to patient's dispensations, medication adherence and persistence\".","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ejhf.70016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":"3436-3440"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12862675/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145063043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1