What causes polarized stagnation, corporate economy, or welfare state?: Insights from new development economics

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12316
Sung‐Hee Jwa
{"title":"What causes polarized stagnation, corporate economy, or welfare state?: Insights from new development economics","authors":"Sung‐Hee Jwa","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.12316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores polarized economic stagnation from the perspective of a capitalist corporate economy. It introduces two institutional policy paradigms: economic differentiation (ED) and economic egalitarianism (EE). ED‐friendly “market democracy” promotes shared growth, whereas EE‐friendly “egalitarian democracy” leads to polarized stagnation. The corporate economy is portrayed as the epitome of the ED institution leading shared growth, whereas the redistributive welfare state based on EE institutions could bring polarized stagnation. Empirical analysis tests these hypotheses and discovers that the world's polarized stagnation may be linked to “welfare policy under egalitarian democracy” rather than “corporate growth under market democracy” as commonly thought.","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores polarized economic stagnation from the perspective of a capitalist corporate economy. It introduces two institutional policy paradigms: economic differentiation (ED) and economic egalitarianism (EE). ED‐friendly “market democracy” promotes shared growth, whereas EE‐friendly “egalitarian democracy” leads to polarized stagnation. The corporate economy is portrayed as the epitome of the ED institution leading shared growth, whereas the redistributive welfare state based on EE institutions could bring polarized stagnation. Empirical analysis tests these hypotheses and discovers that the world's polarized stagnation may be linked to “welfare policy under egalitarian democracy” rather than “corporate growth under market democracy” as commonly thought.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是企业经济还是福利国家导致了两极分化的停滞?新发展经济学的启示
本研究从资本主义企业经济的角度探讨两极分化的经济停滞问题。它引入了两种体制政策范式:经济分化(ED)和经济平等主义(EE)。有利于经济分化的 "市场民主 "促进了共同增长,而有利于经济平等主义的 "平等民主 "则导致了两极分化的停滞。企业经济被描绘成引领共同增长的 ED 体制的缩影,而基于 EE 体制的再分配福利国家则可能带来两极分化的停滞。实证分析检验了这些假设,发现世界两极化停滞可能与 "平等民主制下的福利政策 "有关,而非通常认为的 "市场民主制下的企业增长"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis
期刊最新文献
What causes polarized stagnation, corporate economy, or welfare state?: Insights from new development economics The effects of non‐trade non‐rent barriers on intra‐Africa trade Patriarchy, pandemics, and the gendered resource curse thesis: Evidence from petroleum geology How does oil policy uncertainty influence resource rents? New empirical evidence from Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Appropriability, institutions, and welfare in a Tullock contest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1