Assessment of Perioperative Protamine Reactions in Patients With Fish Allergies: A Retrospective Observational Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.024
Mohanad R. Youssef MD, Eryberto Martinez MD, Terrique M. Pinnock MD, Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada MD, Mark M. Smith MD, Bradford B. Smith MD
{"title":"Assessment of Perioperative Protamine Reactions in Patients With Fish Allergies: A Retrospective Observational Study","authors":"Mohanad R. Youssef MD, Eryberto Martinez MD, Terrique M. Pinnock MD, Alexei Gonzalez-Estrada MD, Mark M. Smith MD, Bradford B. Smith MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To retrospectively assess the incidence and severity of perioperative protamine reactions in adult patients with documented history of fish allergy. Retrospective observational study. Large academic tertiary referral center. Adults with fish allergies undergoing surgeries involving protamine, between January 1, 2008, and March 1, 2018. Perioperative protamine administration in patients with documented fish allergy. Perioperative protamine and anaphylactic reactions were reviewed. A diagnosis of anaphylaxis or protamine reaction was based on clinical suspicion, perioperative events, and postoperative evaluations. Among 214 patients, 2 cases (<1%) of anaphylaxis or protamine reactions occurred. Cardiac procedures were most common (67%). The median intraoperative heparin dosage was 46,000 IU, and the median protamine dosage was 310 mg. Nearly all patients (99%) were admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively, with a median hospital stay of 6.5 days (interquartile range, 5.2-14.6 days). There were 3 deaths (1%) within 30 days, and 15 (7%) within 1 year. The study findings suggest that in patients with a history of fish allergy, cross-reactivity with protamine is unlikely, as anaphylaxis and/or protamine reactions were rare in this patient population in the perioperative environment. Based on these findings, this study does not recommend avoiding protamine solely based on a history of fish allergy when heparin reversal is required during surgery.","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To retrospectively assess the incidence and severity of perioperative protamine reactions in adult patients with documented history of fish allergy. Retrospective observational study. Large academic tertiary referral center. Adults with fish allergies undergoing surgeries involving protamine, between January 1, 2008, and March 1, 2018. Perioperative protamine administration in patients with documented fish allergy. Perioperative protamine and anaphylactic reactions were reviewed. A diagnosis of anaphylaxis or protamine reaction was based on clinical suspicion, perioperative events, and postoperative evaluations. Among 214 patients, 2 cases (<1%) of anaphylaxis or protamine reactions occurred. Cardiac procedures were most common (67%). The median intraoperative heparin dosage was 46,000 IU, and the median protamine dosage was 310 mg. Nearly all patients (99%) were admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively, with a median hospital stay of 6.5 days (interquartile range, 5.2-14.6 days). There were 3 deaths (1%) within 30 days, and 15 (7%) within 1 year. The study findings suggest that in patients with a history of fish allergy, cross-reactivity with protamine is unlikely, as anaphylaxis and/or protamine reactions were rare in this patient population in the perioperative environment. Based on these findings, this study does not recommend avoiding protamine solely based on a history of fish allergy when heparin reversal is required during surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估鱼过敏患者围手术期的原胺反应:一项回顾性观察研究
回顾性评估有鱼类过敏病史记录的成年患者围手术期原胺反应的发生率和严重程度。回顾性观察研究。大型学术三级转诊中心。2008年1月1日至2018年3月1日期间接受过涉及原胺手术的鱼过敏成人。有记录的鱼过敏患者围手术期使用原胺的情况。对围手术期的原胺和过敏反应进行了回顾。过敏性休克或原胺反应的诊断基于临床怀疑、围手术期事件和术后评估。在 214 名患者中,有 2 例(<1%)发生过敏性休克或原胺反应。心脏手术最为常见(67%)。术中肝素用量中位数为 46,000 IU,原胺用量中位数为 310 毫克。几乎所有患者(99%)术后都住进了重症监护室,住院时间中位数为 6.5 天(四分位间范围为 5.2-14.6 天)。30 天内死亡 3 例(1%),1 年内死亡 15 例(7%)。研究结果表明,在有鱼过敏史的患者中,与原胺发生交叉反应的可能性不大,因为在围手术期环境中,过敏性休克和/或原胺反应在这类患者中很少见。基于这些发现,本研究并不建议在手术期间需要逆转肝素时仅因有鱼过敏史而避免使用质胺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Contents Editorial Board 41st Symposium in Barbados brochure Articles to Appear in Future Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1