Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.10.003
Sasa Rajsic, Robert Breitkopf, Beatrix Reyer, Felix Berent, Benedikt Treml, Wolfgang Lederer
Objective
Given the growing imbalance between the demand for solid organ transplants and the limited availability of donor organs, the potential for organ donation from patients with unfavorable neurologic outcomes following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is gaining attention. This work analysed recent studies on organ procurement following eCPR and evaluated the ethical concerns raised by the study authors.
Design
Systematic literature review (Scopus and PubMed, from inception to July 2024).
Setting
All study designs.
Participants
Patients with unfavorable outcomes following eCPR.
Intervention
Ethical challenges raised by the authors.
Measurements and Main Results
Of 1,725 screened publications, 17 studies were included, comprising a total of 254 patients with unfavorable outcomes following eCPR. A total of 689 grafts were reported, and 469 organ recipients. Seven studies addressed ethical aspects, emphasizing that eCPR is primarily initiated to save patients with cardiac arrest who have a likely favorable neurologic prognosis. Organ donation is considered only secondarily, in cases where patients experience an unfavorable outcome.
Conclusion
Organ procurement following eCPR is a sensitive issue that impacts the donor’s relatives, transplant recipients, and healthcare professionals. There is a clear need for internationally coordinated, ethically grounded, and legally binding regulations governing organ procurement. These should include clearly defined criteria for the continuation or termination of eCPR, standardized consent procedures, and structured frameworks for transparent, multidisciplinary decision-making. Establishing such protocols would help ensure ethically consistent practices that balance the potential benefits of organ donation with respect for individual dignity and societal justice.
{"title":"Ethical Aspects of Organ Donation Following Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Unfavorable Neurologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Literature","authors":"Sasa Rajsic, Robert Breitkopf, Beatrix Reyer, Felix Berent, Benedikt Treml, Wolfgang Lederer","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.10.003","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.10.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Given the growing imbalance between the demand for solid organ transplants and the limited availability of donor organs, the potential for organ donation from patients with unfavorable neurologic outcomes following extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is gaining attention. This work analysed recent studies on organ procurement following eCPR and evaluated the ethical concerns raised by the study authors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Systematic literature review (Scopus and PubMed, from inception to July 2024).</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>All study designs.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients with unfavorable outcomes following eCPR.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>Ethical challenges raised by the authors.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>Of 1,725 screened publications, 17 studies were included, comprising a total of 254 patients with unfavorable outcomes following eCPR. A total of 689 grafts were reported, and 469 organ recipients. Seven studies addressed ethical aspects, emphasizing that eCPR is primarily initiated to save patients with cardiac arrest who have a likely favorable neurologic prognosis. Organ donation is considered only secondarily, in cases where patients experience an unfavorable outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Organ procurement following eCPR is a sensitive issue that impacts the donor’s relatives, transplant recipients, and healthcare professionals. There is a clear need for internationally coordinated, ethically grounded, and legally binding regulations governing organ procurement. These should include clearly defined criteria for the continuation or termination of eCPR, standardized consent procedures, and structured frameworks for transparent, multidisciplinary decision-making. Establishing such protocols would help ensure ethically consistent practices that balance the potential benefits of organ donation with respect for individual dignity and societal justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 583-594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145431569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.033
Gabor Erdoes MD, PhD , Andreas Koster MD
{"title":"Unapproved and Undeveloped Rescue Drugs in High-risk Settings: Time for Focused Use of Investigational Resources","authors":"Gabor Erdoes MD, PhD , Andreas Koster MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.033","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 421-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145312938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.036
Mikiko Tomino MD, PhD, Ryoji Maeda MD
{"title":"Bubble-like Echogenic Signals During ECPELLA Support: Differentiating Air Embolism from Cavitation Using Transesophageal Echocardiography","authors":"Mikiko Tomino MD, PhD, Ryoji Maeda MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.036","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 672-675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145354825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To assess the cost-effectiveness of intravenous amino acids (AA) versus placebo in decreasing cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury (AKI) among adult patients after cardiac surgery.
Design
Data on resource use and outcomes were obtained from relevant studies reported in a recent meta-analysis. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted using a decision tree model to quantify the incremental costs and health outcomes of AA versus placebo.
Setting
Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted separately for Australia, the United States, China, Italy, and the United Kingdom using local unit costs.
Participants
Adult patients after cardiac surgery.
Interventions
Intravenous AA versus placebo.
Measurements and Main Results
The cost-effectiveness analyses expressed outcomes in terms of cost per instance of AKI averted with an in-hospital time horizon and from a healthcare payer perspective. The expected total healthcare cost after surgery in patients treated with AA ranged from $1,871 in China to $37,692 in the United States versus $2,055 in China to $40,213 in the United States for the placebo group, with a per patient cost saving ranging from $184 (95% confidence interval [CI], -$331 to -$32) in China to $2,521 (95% CI, -$3,770 to -$1,260) in the United States. AA also resulted in a 5.2% (95% CI, 5.1%-5.3%) absolute risk reduction in AKI. AA was dominant (cost-saving and cost-effective) across all jurisdictions.
Conclusions
Compared with placebo, AA infusion decreases the occurrence of AKI and is cost-saving. Perioperative AA therapy is a rational approach to patient care that simultaneously protects renal function and decreases healthcare costs.
{"title":"Postoperative Cost-effectiveness of Prophylactic Amino Acid Therapy for Renal Protection: A Modeled Economic Evaluation","authors":"Alayna Carrandi MPH , Mussab Faggery PhD , Rosario Losiggio MD , Domenico Pontillo MSc , Alessandro Pruna MD , Giovanni Landoni MD , Rinaldo Bellomo MD , Alisa M. Higgins PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.042","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.042","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the cost-effectiveness of intravenous amino acids (AA) versus placebo in decreasing cardiac surgery–associated acute kidney injury (AKI) among adult patients after cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Data on resource use and outcomes were obtained from relevant studies reported in a recent meta-analysis. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted using a decision tree model to quantify the incremental costs and health outcomes of AA versus placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted separately for Australia, the United States, China, Italy, and the United Kingdom using local unit costs.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Adult patients after cardiac surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Intravenous AA versus placebo.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>The cost-effectiveness analyses expressed outcomes in terms of cost per instance of AKI averted with an in-hospital time horizon and from a healthcare payer perspective. The expected total healthcare cost after surgery in patients treated with AA ranged from $1,871 in China to $37,692 in the United States versus $2,055 in China to $40,213 in the United States for the placebo group, with a per patient cost saving ranging from $184 (95% confidence interval [CI], -$331 to -$32) in China to $2,521 (95% CI, -$3,770 to -$1,260) in the United States. AA also resulted in a 5.2% (95% CI, 5.1%-5.3%) absolute risk reduction in AKI. AA was dominant (cost-saving and cost-effective) across all jurisdictions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with placebo, AA infusion decreases the occurrence of AKI and is cost-saving. Perioperative AA therapy is a rational approach to patient care that simultaneously protects renal function and decreases healthcare costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 724-731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145495482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.229
Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Souza MD , Milton Morais Correia Neto , Mauricio Cardoso Paz , Raul Valério Ponte MD
Cardiac surgery triggers a systemic inflammatory response, especially when cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is used, which may contribute to postoperative complications. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has shown anti-inflammatory potential by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B and reducing cytokine release, but its perioperative immunomodulatory effects remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative ketamine to placebo in cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was interleukin (IL)-6 level; secondary outcomes included C-reactive protein (CRP) level, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and transfusion requirements. Eight RCTs, including a total of 377 patients, were included in the analysis. Ketamine did not significantly reduce IL-6 levels at 24 hours postoperatively (standardized mean difference [SMD], –0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], –2.56 to 0.65; I² = 96%), although a significant decrease was observed in off-pump procedures (mean difference [MD], –59.57 pg/mL; I² = 0%). IL-6 levels measured immediately after CPB and CRP levels immediately after surgery also were reduced, but findings were limited by high heterogeneity. No significant differences were observed in ICU length of stay (MD, –0.10 days), ventilation time (MD, –0.86 hours), or transfusion rates (risk ratio, 1.01). The certainty of the evidence was rated low to moderate owing to imprecision and inconsistency. Although ketamine’s immunomodulatory effects were observed in selected subgroups, they did not translate into improved clinical outcomes. Current evidence does not support the routine use of ketamine for inflammation control in cardiac surgery, although its effect in off-pump procedures warrants further research.
{"title":"Ketamine in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effects on Inflammatory Markers and Clinical Outcomes","authors":"Priscila Ferreira de Lima e Souza MD , Milton Morais Correia Neto , Mauricio Cardoso Paz , Raul Valério Ponte MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.229","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.229","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiac surgery triggers a systemic inflammatory response, especially when cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is used, which may contribute to postoperative complications. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has shown anti-inflammatory potential by inhibiting nuclear factor kappa B and reducing cytokine release, but its perioperative immunomodulatory effects remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative ketamine to placebo in cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was interleukin (IL)-6 level; secondary outcomes included C-reactive protein (CRP) level, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and transfusion requirements. Eight RCTs, including a total of 377 patients, were included in the analysis. Ketamine did not significantly reduce IL-6 levels at 24 hours postoperatively (standardized mean difference [SMD], –0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], –2.56 to 0.65; <em>I</em>² = 96%), although a significant decrease was observed in off-pump procedures (mean difference [MD], –59.57 pg/mL; <em>I</em>² = 0%). IL-6 levels measured immediately after CPB and CRP levels immediately after surgery also were reduced, but findings were limited by high heterogeneity. No significant differences were observed in ICU length of stay (MD, –0.10 days), ventilation time (MD, –0.86 hours), or transfusion rates (risk ratio, 1.01). The certainty of the evidence was rated low to moderate owing to imprecision and inconsistency. Although ketamine’s immunomodulatory effects were observed in selected subgroups, they did not translate into improved clinical outcomes. Current evidence does not support the routine use of ketamine for inflammation control in cardiac surgery, although its effect in off-pump procedures warrants further research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 690-698"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145512882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.11.005
John A. Kucera MD , Fintan Hughes MB BCh BAO , Seth E.M. Wolf MD , Michael Greenberg MD , Edmund Jooste MB BCh , Michael Mensah-Mamfo BS , Lindsey Reynolds BS , Douglas M. Overbey MD, MPH , Joseph W. Turek MD, PhD, MBA , Lisa Einhorn MD , Warwick Ames MB BS , Natalia Diaz-Rodriguez MD, MHS
Objective
The purpose of this study is to describe a cohort of pediatric patients undergoing robot-assisted cardiac surgery at a single center and to discuss the anesthetic implications and perioperative considerations to optimize outcomes.
Design
A retrospective observational cohort study.
Setting
Academic tertiary care medical center.
Participants
Nine children underwent robot-assisted cardiac surgery from 2022 to 2024. Indications for operation included atrial septal defect (n = 8) and mitral valve regurgitation with concomitant Marfan syndrome (n = 1).
Mean (SD) age was 13.1 (2.5) years, mean (SD) weight was 48.5 (20.3) kg, and mean (SD) body mass index was 21.7 (5.4) kg/m2. Mean (SD) operative time was 388.2 (40.7) minutes, fibrillation time was 92.4 (25.8) minutes, and cardiopulmonary bypass time was 192.1 (31.3) minutes. None of the patients required 1-lung ventilation based on surgeon preference, and most patients (77.8%) were extubated in the operating room. The median (IQR) intensive care unit length of stay was 45 (26) hours, and the median (IQR) hospital stay was 3 (2.5) days. One patient required conversion to median sternotomy due to aortic insufficiency in the setting of Marfan syndrome and aortic root dilation. One patient required a reoperation due to bleeding following an emesis episode in the intensive care unit. There were no mortality events.
Conclusions
Robot-assisted cardiac surgery is well tolerated in appropriately selected pediatric patients, including children as small as 24 kg. Our experience suggests that the success of this approach is predicated upon a center with institutional experience and multidisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, it is critical that the anesthesiologist understands the unique anatomic, airway, monitoring, positioning, and surgical considerations that are unique for this patient population.
{"title":"Surgical and Anesthesia-Related Concerns forRobot-Assisted Pediatric Cardiac Surgery","authors":"John A. Kucera MD , Fintan Hughes MB BCh BAO , Seth E.M. Wolf MD , Michael Greenberg MD , Edmund Jooste MB BCh , Michael Mensah-Mamfo BS , Lindsey Reynolds BS , Douglas M. Overbey MD, MPH , Joseph W. Turek MD, PhD, MBA , Lisa Einhorn MD , Warwick Ames MB BS , Natalia Diaz-Rodriguez MD, MHS","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.11.005","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.11.005","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to describe a cohort of pediatric patients undergoing robot-assisted cardiac surgery at a single center and to discuss the anesthetic implications and perioperative considerations to optimize outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A retrospective observational cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Academic tertiary care medical center.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nine children underwent robot-assisted cardiac surgery from 2022 to 2024. Indications for operation included atrial septal defect (n = 8) and mitral valve regurgitation with concomitant Marfan syndrome (n = 1).</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Eight patients underwent atrial septal defect closure; 1 patient underwent mitral valve repair.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Main Results</h3><div>Mean (SD) age was 13.1 (2.5) years, mean (SD) weight was 48.5 (20.3) kg, and mean (SD) body mass index was 21.7 (5.4) kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Mean (SD) operative time was 388.2 (40.7) minutes, fibrillation time was 92.4 (25.8) minutes, and cardiopulmonary bypass time was 192.1 (31.3) minutes. None of the patients required 1-lung ventilation based on surgeon preference, and most patients (77.8%) were extubated in the operating room. The median (IQR) intensive care unit length of stay was 45 (26) hours, and the median (IQR) hospital stay was 3 (2.5) days. One patient required conversion to median sternotomy due to aortic insufficiency in the setting of Marfan syndrome and aortic root dilation. One patient required a reoperation due to bleeding following an emesis episode in the intensive care unit. There were no mortality events.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Robot-assisted cardiac surgery is well tolerated in appropriately selected pediatric patients, including children as small as 24 kg. Our experience suggests that the success of this approach is predicated upon a center with institutional experience and multidisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, it is critical that the anesthesiologist understands the unique anatomic, airway, monitoring, positioning, and surgical considerations that are unique for this patient population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 606-612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.051
Alison V. Grazioli MD , Michael E. Plazak PharmD , Cynthia S. Shen DO, M.S. , Thomas M. Scalea MD , Rishi Kundi MD , Ramon A. Riojas MD , Leonid A. Belyayev MD
{"title":"Use of High-dose Intravenous Immunoglobulin as Initial Therapy for Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients With High Bleeding Risk","authors":"Alison V. Grazioli MD , Michael E. Plazak PharmD , Cynthia S. Shen DO, M.S. , Thomas M. Scalea MD , Rishi Kundi MD , Ramon A. Riojas MD , Leonid A. Belyayev MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.051","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 660-664"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145131034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.020
Melina Heine , Jay S. Saggu MD, DMD , Christoph G.S. Nabzdyk MD , Tommaso Hinna Danesi MD , Jakob Wollborn MD, MPH
Endoscopic cardiac surgery is associated with faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, fewer postoperative infections, and better cosmetic results. Although not suitable for every patient, minimally invasive cardiac surgery, including endoscopic cardiac surgery, may demonstrate advantages over standard sternotomy-based approaches. On the other hand, the steep learning curve and specific setup present challenges to surgeons and anesthesiologists. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the anesthetic challenges encountered in the perioperative management of patients undergoing endoscopic cardiac surgery.
{"title":"Minimally Invasive, Maximally Effective: Anesthetic Management for Endoscopic Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Melina Heine , Jay S. Saggu MD, DMD , Christoph G.S. Nabzdyk MD , Tommaso Hinna Danesi MD , Jakob Wollborn MD, MPH","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.020","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Endoscopic cardiac surgery is associated with faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, less blood loss, fewer postoperative infections, and better cosmetic results. Although not suitable for every patient, minimally invasive cardiac surgery, including endoscopic cardiac surgery, may demonstrate advantages over standard sternotomy-based approaches. On the other hand, the steep learning curve and specific setup present challenges to surgeons and anesthesiologists. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the anesthetic challenges encountered in the perioperative management of patients undergoing endoscopic cardiac surgery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 710-723"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145354851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.023
Daniel S. Cormican MD , Karthikeyan Ranganathan MD
{"title":"Selection Matters: Use of Microaxial Flow Pumps in Acute Myocardial Infarction–Associated Cardiogenic Shock/Danger Shock Trial","authors":"Daniel S. Cormican MD , Karthikeyan Ranganathan MD","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.023","DOIUrl":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.09.023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"40 2","pages":"Pages 417-420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145292245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}