Evolutionary Choice between Cholesterol and Ergosterol

S. S. Sokolov, S. A. Akimov, F. F. Severin
{"title":"Evolutionary Choice between Cholesterol and Ergosterol","authors":"S. S. Sokolov,&nbsp;S. A. Akimov,&nbsp;F. F. Severin","doi":"10.1134/S1990747824700211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sterol biosynthesis has evolved early in the history of eukaryotes. In most animals, as well as in primitive fungi, the main sterol is cholesterol. During the process of evolution, fungi acquired the ability to synthesize ergosterol. The pathway of its biosynthesis is more complex than the one of cholesterol biosynthesis. However, the evolutionary choice of most fungi was ergosterol, and the reason for this choice is still debated. In the majority of the works on this issue, the choice of most fungi is associated with the transition to life on land, and, consequently, the danger of cell dehydration. In our review we oppose this point of view. Probably, compared to cholesterol, ergosterol has more pronounced antioxidant properties. Indeed, the presence of three double bonds in the structure of the ergostеrol molecule, as compared to one in cholesterol, increases the probability of interaction with reactive oxygen species. Perhaps, the transition to life on land required additional antioxidant protection. Due to the aforementioned structural differences, the molecule of cholesterol is apparently more flexible than that of ergosterol. Experimental data indicate that this feature provides greater membrane flexibility as compared to fungal membranes, as well as a greater ability to compensate for disturbances in the packing of membrane phospholipids. Presumably, for animal cells these qualities turned out to be relatively more important than antioxidant ones, which predetermined their evolutionary choice of sterol.</p>","PeriodicalId":484,"journal":{"name":"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology","volume":"18 3","pages":"219 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1990747824700211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sterol biosynthesis has evolved early in the history of eukaryotes. In most animals, as well as in primitive fungi, the main sterol is cholesterol. During the process of evolution, fungi acquired the ability to synthesize ergosterol. The pathway of its biosynthesis is more complex than the one of cholesterol biosynthesis. However, the evolutionary choice of most fungi was ergosterol, and the reason for this choice is still debated. In the majority of the works on this issue, the choice of most fungi is associated with the transition to life on land, and, consequently, the danger of cell dehydration. In our review we oppose this point of view. Probably, compared to cholesterol, ergosterol has more pronounced antioxidant properties. Indeed, the presence of three double bonds in the structure of the ergostеrol molecule, as compared to one in cholesterol, increases the probability of interaction with reactive oxygen species. Perhaps, the transition to life on land required additional antioxidant protection. Due to the aforementioned structural differences, the molecule of cholesterol is apparently more flexible than that of ergosterol. Experimental data indicate that this feature provides greater membrane flexibility as compared to fungal membranes, as well as a greater ability to compensate for disturbances in the packing of membrane phospholipids. Presumably, for animal cells these qualities turned out to be relatively more important than antioxidant ones, which predetermined their evolutionary choice of sterol.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆固醇和麦角固醇之间的进化选择
摘要甾醇的生物合成在真核生物的历史上很早就出现了。在大多数动物和原始真菌中,主要的甾醇是胆固醇。在进化过程中,真菌获得了合成麦角甾醇的能力。其生物合成途径比胆固醇生物合成途径更为复杂。然而,大多数真菌在进化过程中选择了麦角甾醇,而这种选择的原因至今仍有争议。在有关这一问题的大多数著作中,大多数真菌的选择与向陆地生活的过渡有关,因此也与细胞脱水的危险有关。在我们的评论中,我们反对这种观点。与胆固醇相比,麦角固醇可能具有更明显的抗氧化特性。事实上,麦角甾醇分子结构中有三个双键,而胆固醇只有一个,这增加了与活性氧相互作用的可能性。也许,过渡到陆地生活需要额外的抗氧化保护。由于上述结构差异,胆固醇分子显然比麦角固醇分子更灵活。实验数据表明,与真菌膜相比,胆固醇的这一特性使膜具有更大的柔韧性,并具有更强的补偿膜磷脂堆积紊乱的能力。对动物细胞来说,这些特性可能比抗氧化特性更为重要,这就决定了它们在进化过程中对固醇的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology   is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes original articles on physical, chemical, and molecular mechanisms that underlie basic properties of biological membranes and mediate membrane-related cellular functions. The primary topics of the journal are membrane structure, mechanisms of membrane transport, bioenergetics and photobiology, intracellular signaling as well as membrane aspects of cell biology, immunology, and medicine. The journal is multidisciplinary and gives preference to those articles that employ a variety of experimental approaches, basically in biophysics but also in biochemistry, cytology, and molecular biology. The journal publishes articles that strive for unveiling membrane and cellular functions through innovative theoretical models and computer simulations.
期刊最新文献
The Rhodopsin Project To the 90th Anniversary of the Birth of Academician Yuri Anatolievich Ovchinnikov Alterations of Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Neurodegenerative Pathologies: History, Facts, and Prospects Structural Studies of Ion Channels: Achievements, Problems, and Perspectives Structure and Functions of the OTOP1 Proton Channel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1