Shirelle X. Liu, Andrew C. Harris, Jonathan C. Gewirtz
{"title":"How life events may confer vulnerability to addiction: the role of epigenetics","authors":"Shirelle X. Liu, Andrew C. Harris, Jonathan C. Gewirtz","doi":"10.3389/fnmol.2024.1462769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Substance use disorder (SUD) represents a large and growing global health problem. Despite the strong addictive potency of drugs of abuse, only a minority of those exposed develop SUDs. While certain life experiences (e.g., childhood trauma) may increase subsequent vulnerability to SUDs, mechanisms underlying these effects are not yet well understood. Given the chronic and relapsing nature of SUDs, and the length of time that can elapse between prior life events and subsequent drug exposure, changes in SUD vulnerability almost certainly involve long-term epigenetic dysregulation. To validate this idea, functional effects of specific epigenetic modifications in brain regions mediating reinforcement learning (e.g., nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex) have been investigated in a variety of animal models of SUDs. In addition, the effects of epigenetic modifications produced by prior life experiences on subsequent SUD vulnerability have been studied, but mostly in a correlational manner. Here, we review how epigenetic mechanisms impact SUD-related behavior in animal models and summarize our understanding of the relationships among life experiences, epigenetic regulation, and future vulnerability to SUDs. Despite variations in study design, epigenetic modifications that most consistently affect SUD-related behavior are those that produce predominantly unidirectional effects on gene regulation, such as DNA methylation and histone phosphorylation. Evidence explicitly linking environmentally induced epigenetic modifications to subsequent SUD-related behavior is surprisingly sparse. We conclude by offering several directions for future research to begin to address this critical research gap.","PeriodicalId":12630,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2024.1462769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Substance use disorder (SUD) represents a large and growing global health problem. Despite the strong addictive potency of drugs of abuse, only a minority of those exposed develop SUDs. While certain life experiences (e.g., childhood trauma) may increase subsequent vulnerability to SUDs, mechanisms underlying these effects are not yet well understood. Given the chronic and relapsing nature of SUDs, and the length of time that can elapse between prior life events and subsequent drug exposure, changes in SUD vulnerability almost certainly involve long-term epigenetic dysregulation. To validate this idea, functional effects of specific epigenetic modifications in brain regions mediating reinforcement learning (e.g., nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex) have been investigated in a variety of animal models of SUDs. In addition, the effects of epigenetic modifications produced by prior life experiences on subsequent SUD vulnerability have been studied, but mostly in a correlational manner. Here, we review how epigenetic mechanisms impact SUD-related behavior in animal models and summarize our understanding of the relationships among life experiences, epigenetic regulation, and future vulnerability to SUDs. Despite variations in study design, epigenetic modifications that most consistently affect SUD-related behavior are those that produce predominantly unidirectional effects on gene regulation, such as DNA methylation and histone phosphorylation. Evidence explicitly linking environmentally induced epigenetic modifications to subsequent SUD-related behavior is surprisingly sparse. We conclude by offering several directions for future research to begin to address this critical research gap.
药物滥用障碍(SUD)是一个巨大且日益严重的全球性健康问题。尽管滥用药物具有很强的成瘾性,但只有少数接触者会发展成 SUD。虽然某些生活经历(如童年创伤)可能会增加日后患上药物滥用障碍的可能性,但这些影响的内在机制尚不十分清楚。鉴于药物依赖性失调症的慢性和复发性,以及先前的生活事件和随后的药物接触之间可能间隔的时间长度,药物依赖性失调症易感性的变化几乎肯定涉及长期的表观遗传失调。为了验证这一观点,我们在多种 SUDs 动物模型中研究了特定表观遗传修饰对介导强化学习的脑区(如伏隔核、前额叶皮层)的功能影响。此外,人们还研究了先前的生活经历所产生的表观遗传修饰对随后的药物依赖性易感性的影响,但大多是以相关的方式进行的。在此,我们回顾了表观遗传机制如何影响动物模型中与 SUD 相关的行为,并总结了我们对生活经历、表观遗传调控和未来易患 SUD 之间关系的理解。尽管研究设计存在差异,但对 SUD 相关行为产生最一致影响的表观遗传修饰主要是那些对基因调控产生单向影响的修饰,如 DNA 甲基化和组蛋白磷酸化。将环境诱导的表观遗传修饰与随后的 SUD 相关行为明确联系起来的证据少得令人吃惊。最后,我们提出了未来研究的几个方向,以着手解决这一关键的研究空白。
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to identifying key molecules, as well as their functions and interactions, that underlie the structure, design and function of the brain across all levels. The scope of our journal encompasses synaptic and cellular proteins, coding and non-coding RNA, and molecular mechanisms regulating cellular and dendritic RNA translation. In recent years, a plethora of new cellular and synaptic players have been identified from reduced systems, such as neuronal cultures, but the relevance of these molecules in terms of cellular and synaptic function and plasticity in the living brain and its circuits has not been validated. The effects of spine growth and density observed using gene products identified from in vitro work are frequently not reproduced in vivo. Our journal is particularly interested in studies on genetically engineered model organisms (C. elegans, Drosophila, mouse), in which alterations in key molecules underlying cellular and synaptic function and plasticity produce defined anatomical, physiological and behavioral changes. In the mouse, genetic alterations limited to particular neural circuits (olfactory bulb, motor cortex, cortical layers, hippocampal subfields, cerebellum), preferably regulated in time and on demand, are of special interest, as they sidestep potential compensatory developmental effects.