Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1111/joop.12542
Claire E. Smith, Samuel T. McAbee, Lindsey Freier, Susannah Huang, Melissa A. Albert
{"title":"Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network","authors":"Claire E. Smith, Samuel T. McAbee, Lindsey Freier, Susannah Huang, Melissa A. Albert","doi":"10.1111/joop.12542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The social context of the workplace influences attendance decisions. Regardless of personal and job factors, employees may choose to engage in sickness presenteeism behaviour (i.e., working when unwell) because of perceived pressure from the organization. Using Social Information Processing Theory, we introduce the construct of presenteeism pressure to capture this perception that an organization normalizes and expects employees to engage in presenteeism. Through a scale development study of working adults (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 219), we create and refine the 11‐item Presenteeism Pressure Scale. Next, we provide evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the scale in an independent sample of working adults (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 248). We then concurrently examine presenteeism pressure's place in a nomological network of constructs within the presenteeism and broader organizational literature, in another sample (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 764). Finally, we increase the rigour of our validation efforts by conducting an additional two‐wave study (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 350) and expanding the nomological network of presenteeism pressure to include relevant work outcomes. Our results position presenteeism pressure as a unique and promising contributor to the understanding of presenteeism behaviours and work behaviours more generally. We conclude with suggestions for integrating presenteeism pressure into existing theory and better‐informed organizational attendance procedures.","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The social context of the workplace influences attendance decisions. Regardless of personal and job factors, employees may choose to engage in sickness presenteeism behaviour (i.e., working when unwell) because of perceived pressure from the organization. Using Social Information Processing Theory, we introduce the construct of presenteeism pressure to capture this perception that an organization normalizes and expects employees to engage in presenteeism. Through a scale development study of working adults (N = 219), we create and refine the 11‐item Presenteeism Pressure Scale. Next, we provide evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the scale in an independent sample of working adults (N = 248). We then concurrently examine presenteeism pressure's place in a nomological network of constructs within the presenteeism and broader organizational literature, in another sample (N = 764). Finally, we increase the rigour of our validation efforts by conducting an additional two‐wave study (N = 350) and expanding the nomological network of presenteeism pressure to include relevant work outcomes. Our results position presenteeism pressure as a unique and promising contributor to the understanding of presenteeism behaviours and work behaviours more generally. We conclude with suggestions for integrating presenteeism pressure into existing theory and better‐informed organizational attendance procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旷工压力:量表和名义网络的开发
工作场所的社会环境会影响出勤决定。无论个人因素和工作因素如何,员工可能会因为感受到来自组织的压力而选择病假行为(即在身体不适的情况下工作)。利用社会信息处理理论,我们引入了 "缺勤压力 "这一概念,以捕捉组织将员工缺勤正常化并期望员工缺勤的这一感知。通过对在职成年人(N = 219)进行量表开发研究,我们创建并完善了 11 个项目的 "迟到压力量表"。接下来,我们在一个独立的在职成年人样本(样本数 = 248)中提供了该量表的收敛性和区分性有效性的证据。然后,我们在另一个样本(样本数 = 764)中同时研究了现职压力在现职主义和更广泛的组织文献中的结构网络中的位置。最后,我们通过开展额外的两波研究(样本数 = 350),扩大了现时就职压力的理论网络,将相关的工作成果也纳入其中,从而提高了验证工作的严谨性。我们的研究结果将旷工压力定位为一种独特的、有希望促进对旷工行为和一般工作行为的理解的因素。最后,我们提出了将旷工压力纳入现有理论和组织考勤程序的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information How much do family‐supportive supervisor behaviours matter? A meta‐analysis based on the ability‐motivation‐opportunity framework Uneventful days? A cautionary tale about the underestimated role of triggering events in employee silence research Presenteeism pressure: The development of a scale and a nomological network Supervisor‐directed anger as a link between work–family conflict and unethical pro‐family behaviours: An attributional perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1