Andrew N Reynolds,Jessica Lang,Amanda Brand,Jim Mann
{"title":"Higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets better than lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets for diabetes management: Rapid review with meta-analyses.","authors":"Andrew N Reynolds,Jessica Lang,Amanda Brand,Jim Mann","doi":"10.1111/obr.13837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSome dietary recommendations continue to recommend carbohydrate restriction as a cornerstone of dietary advice for people with diabetes.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nWe compared the cardiometabolic effects of diets higher in both fiber and carbohydrate with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets in type 1 or type 2 diabetes.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nMEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to June 24, 2024, with additional hand searching.\r\n\r\nSTUDY SELECTION\r\nRandomized controlled trials in which both dietary fiber and carbohydrate amount had been modified were identified from source evidence syntheses on carbohydrate amount in people with diabetes.\r\n\r\nDATA EXTRACTION\r\nTwo reviewers independently.\r\n\r\nDATA SYNTHESIS\r\nTen eligible trials including 499 participants with diabetes (98% with T2) were identified from the potentially eligible 828 trials included in existing evidence syntheses. Pooled findings indicate that higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.50% [95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.02]), fasting insulin (MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.83 to -0.15]), total cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L [-0.27 to -0.05]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L (-0.31 to -0.01) when compared with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets. Trials with larger differences in fiber and carbohydrate intakes between interventions reported greater reductions. Certainty of evidence for these outcomes was moderate or high, with most outcomes downgraded due to heterogeneity unexplained by any single variable.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS\r\nOur predefined scope excluded trials with co-interventions such as energy restriction, which may have provided addition information.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nFindings indicate the greater importance of promoting dietary fiber intakes, and the relative unimportance of carbohydrate amount in recommendations for people with diabetes.","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":"55 1","pages":"e13837"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Some dietary recommendations continue to recommend carbohydrate restriction as a cornerstone of dietary advice for people with diabetes.
PURPOSE
We compared the cardiometabolic effects of diets higher in both fiber and carbohydrate with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets in type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews up to June 24, 2024, with additional hand searching.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials in which both dietary fiber and carbohydrate amount had been modified were identified from source evidence syntheses on carbohydrate amount in people with diabetes.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Ten eligible trials including 499 participants with diabetes (98% with T2) were identified from the potentially eligible 828 trials included in existing evidence syntheses. Pooled findings indicate that higher fiber higher carbohydrate diets reduced HbA1c (mean difference [MD] -0.50% [95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.02]), fasting insulin (MD -0.99 μIU/mL [-1.83 to -0.15]), total cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L [-0.27 to -0.05]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -0.16 mmol/L (-0.31 to -0.01) when compared with lower carbohydrate lower fiber diets. Trials with larger differences in fiber and carbohydrate intakes between interventions reported greater reductions. Certainty of evidence for these outcomes was moderate or high, with most outcomes downgraded due to heterogeneity unexplained by any single variable.
LIMITATIONS
Our predefined scope excluded trials with co-interventions such as energy restriction, which may have provided addition information.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings indicate the greater importance of promoting dietary fiber intakes, and the relative unimportance of carbohydrate amount in recommendations for people with diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities.
Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field.
The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.