Giulia Gilberti, Giorgio Tiecco, Silvia Marconi, Monica Marullo, Barbara Zanini, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan
HIV remains a significant health concern, but the advent of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed it into a manageable chronic condition. However, weight gain and obesity pose a substantial challenge for people living with HIV (PLWH). Moreover, the role of lifestyle has not yet been comprehensively investigated. This review aims to provide an updated perspective on the role of lifestyle factors in weight gain and obesity among PLWH. A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov according to PRISMA guidelines. Overall, 378 articles were identified, of which 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. No article comprehensively addressed all lifestyle factors, and only 8 (36.4%) evaluated 3 or more factors. Addictions (72.7%), food (34.4%), and physical activity (31.8%) were the most analyzed aspects. An absence of concordance was identified among the articles concerning the timing of assessments, methodologies employed in surveys, and the operational definitions utilized for "weight gain," "overweight," and "obesity." Weight gain in PLWH represents a complex phenomenon necessitating a holistic approach to promote well-being in this vulnerable population.
{"title":"Weight gain, obesity, and the impact of lifestyle factors among people living with HIV: A systematic review.","authors":"Giulia Gilberti, Giorgio Tiecco, Silvia Marconi, Monica Marullo, Barbara Zanini, Eugenia Quiros-Roldan","doi":"10.1111/obr.13908","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13908","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HIV remains a significant health concern, but the advent of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed it into a manageable chronic condition. However, weight gain and obesity pose a substantial challenge for people living with HIV (PLWH). Moreover, the role of lifestyle has not yet been comprehensively investigated. This review aims to provide an updated perspective on the role of lifestyle factors in weight gain and obesity among PLWH. A systematic search was conducted on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov according to PRISMA guidelines. Overall, 378 articles were identified, of which 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. No article comprehensively addressed all lifestyle factors, and only 8 (36.4%) evaluated 3 or more factors. Addictions (72.7%), food (34.4%), and physical activity (31.8%) were the most analyzed aspects. An absence of concordance was identified among the articles concerning the timing of assessments, methodologies employed in surveys, and the operational definitions utilized for \"weight gain,\" \"overweight,\" and \"obesity.\" Weight gain in PLWH represents a complex phenomenon necessitating a holistic approach to promote well-being in this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13908"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143431950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi, George Doumat, Isis F Baroni, Carlos A Camargo
Background: In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the possible role of weight loss on asthma control, quality of life (QOL), and clinical outcomes among patients with asthma.
Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and OVID Medline for randomized controlled human trials that examined the effects of weight loss on asthma control, QOL, and spirometry results, from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023. Twelve eligible studies (total n = 1052 participants) were included. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effect size. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression approaches were performed to reveal possible sources of heterogeneity. Fractional polynomial modeling was performed to assess non-linear associations.
Results: Weight loss reduced ACQ score (WMD -0.67 [95%CIs - 1.20, -0.13], P = 0.02; I2 91.3%, P < 0.001), and improved forced expiratory volume percent predicted (FEV)1pp (WMD 13.08 [95%CIs 2.42, 23.73], P = 0.02; I2 94.1%, P < 0.001) among patients with asthma. In a dose-response analysis, a significant non-linear association was reported between change in weight and changes in FEV1pp (Pnon-linearity = 0.01). The effects of weight loss on QOL (WMD 0.53 [-0.38, 1.44], P = 0.25; I2 95.6%, P < 0.001) and forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVC pp, WMD 4.90 [-3.22, 13.02], P = 0.24; I2 91.4%, P < 0.001) were not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Weight loss improves asthma control and FEV1pp among patients with asthma in a two-class meta-analysis. Because of the relatively low number of well-designed clinical trials (n = 12), further trials are needed to better define the beneficial effects of weight loss on asthma control.
{"title":"Weight loss and asthma control: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi, George Doumat, Isis F Baroni, Carlos A Camargo","doi":"10.1111/obr.13907","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13907","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the possible role of weight loss on asthma control, quality of life (QOL), and clinical outcomes among patients with asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, and OVID Medline for randomized controlled human trials that examined the effects of weight loss on asthma control, QOL, and spirometry results, from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2023. Twelve eligible studies (total n = 1052 participants) were included. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effect size. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression approaches were performed to reveal possible sources of heterogeneity. Fractional polynomial modeling was performed to assess non-linear associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weight loss reduced ACQ score (WMD -0.67 [95%CIs - 1.20, -0.13], P = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> 91.3%, P < 0.001), and improved forced expiratory volume percent predicted (FEV)1<sub>pp</sub> (WMD 13.08 [95%CIs 2.42, 23.73], P = 0.02; I<sup>2</sup> 94.1%, P < 0.001) among patients with asthma. In a dose-response analysis, a significant non-linear association was reported between change in weight and changes in FEV1<sub>pp</sub> (P<sub>non-linearity</sub> = 0.01). The effects of weight loss on QOL (WMD 0.53 [-0.38, 1.44], P = 0.25; I<sup>2</sup> 95.6%, P < 0.001) and forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVC <sub>pp</sub>, WMD 4.90 [-3.22, 13.02], P = 0.24; I<sup>2</sup> 91.4%, P < 0.001) were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weight loss improves asthma control and FEV1<sub>pp</sub> among patients with asthma in a two-class meta-analysis. Because of the relatively low number of well-designed clinical trials (n = 12), further trials are needed to better define the beneficial effects of weight loss on asthma control.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13907"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leonida Nyarwaba Mosomi, Magaly Aceves-Martins, Alexandra M Johnstone, Baukje de Roos
We systematically assessed evidence of overweight and obesity prevalence, and possible determinants, in people who experience incarceration globally. We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Overweight and obesity proportions were pooled into a meta-analysis and compared with national prevalences. Seventy-one studies met the inclusion criteria; 38 were included in the meta-analysis. Studies in high-income countries reported higher proportions of overweight and obesity (73.3%, 95% CI 73.1, 73.5) than upper-middle-income countries (66.1%, 95% CI 64.1, 67.7) and lower-middle-income countries (52.8%, 95% CI 47.1, 58.1). The prevalence of overweight and obesity in female incarcerated individuals was higher than that in the general population (RD 11.7%, 95% CI 9.1, 14.3), especially in low and middle-income countries (RD 35.1%, 95% CI 29.4, 40.7). The prevalence of overweight and obesity in male incarcerated individuals was lower than that in the general population in all income categories (RD -10.8%, 95% CI -13.2, -8.4). Incarcerated individuals in low and lower-middle-income countries were less likely to achieve sufficient energy intake, fruit/vegetable intake, and sufficient physical activity, compared with high- and upper-middle-income countries. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in incarcerated populations differed between developed and developing countries. Future research should focus on female incarcerated individuals, especially in lower-middle-income countries.
{"title":"Prevalence of overweight and obesity in incarcerated individuals in developed and developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Leonida Nyarwaba Mosomi, Magaly Aceves-Martins, Alexandra M Johnstone, Baukje de Roos","doi":"10.1111/obr.13906","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13906","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We systematically assessed evidence of overweight and obesity prevalence, and possible determinants, in people who experience incarceration globally. We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases. Overweight and obesity proportions were pooled into a meta-analysis and compared with national prevalences. Seventy-one studies met the inclusion criteria; 38 were included in the meta-analysis. Studies in high-income countries reported higher proportions of overweight and obesity (73.3%, 95% CI 73.1, 73.5) than upper-middle-income countries (66.1%, 95% CI 64.1, 67.7) and lower-middle-income countries (52.8%, 95% CI 47.1, 58.1). The prevalence of overweight and obesity in female incarcerated individuals was higher than that in the general population (RD 11.7%, 95% CI 9.1, 14.3), especially in low and middle-income countries (RD 35.1%, 95% CI 29.4, 40.7). The prevalence of overweight and obesity in male incarcerated individuals was lower than that in the general population in all income categories (RD -10.8%, 95% CI -13.2, -8.4). Incarcerated individuals in low and lower-middle-income countries were less likely to achieve sufficient energy intake, fruit/vegetable intake, and sufficient physical activity, compared with high- and upper-middle-income countries. The prevalence of overweight and obesity in incarcerated populations differed between developed and developing countries. Future research should focus on female incarcerated individuals, especially in lower-middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13906"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ashleigh Upton, Dean Spirou, Matthew Craig, Natalie Saul, Olivia Winmill, Phillipa Hay, Jayanthi Raman
Obesity is a preventable global health epidemic that has serious health consequences. Health literacy has been identified as an underlying and modifiable factor in the development and maintenance of obesity. Adequate levels of health literacy have been shown to significantly impact on weight loss, weight loss maintenance, and associated health outcomes.
Objective: The aim of the current study was to systematically review extant literature to evaluate the way in which health literacy is measured for individuals with obesity and to identify the key areas of health literacy that are commonly assessed.
Method: This systematic scoping review was conducted over five databases and yielded 12 papers (Nparticipants = 15,393) that represented our search strategy and inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Results: The review highlighted there are currently multiple measures that exist that assess independent or dual domains of health literacy; however, there were no studies that specifically utilized a measure that holistically assessed the three maintaining and modifiable domains of health literacy of obesity (psychological knowledge, nutritional knowledge, and knowledge about physical activity).
Conclusion: Given the dearth of targeted health literacy measures for obesity, our findings highlighted a critical need to develop a distinct measure of health literacy for obesity to guide policy, research, education, and intervention.
{"title":"Health literacy and obesity: A systematic scoping review.","authors":"Ashleigh Upton, Dean Spirou, Matthew Craig, Natalie Saul, Olivia Winmill, Phillipa Hay, Jayanthi Raman","doi":"10.1111/obr.13904","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13904","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obesity is a preventable global health epidemic that has serious health consequences. Health literacy has been identified as an underlying and modifiable factor in the development and maintenance of obesity. Adequate levels of health literacy have been shown to significantly impact on weight loss, weight loss maintenance, and associated health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the current study was to systematically review extant literature to evaluate the way in which health literacy is measured for individuals with obesity and to identify the key areas of health literacy that are commonly assessed.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This systematic scoping review was conducted over five databases and yielded 12 papers (N<sub>participants</sub> = 15,393) that represented our search strategy and inclusion and exclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review highlighted there are currently multiple measures that exist that assess independent or dual domains of health literacy; however, there were no studies that specifically utilized a measure that holistically assessed the three maintaining and modifiable domains of health literacy of obesity (psychological knowledge, nutritional knowledge, and knowledge about physical activity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the dearth of targeted health literacy measures for obesity, our findings highlighted a critical need to develop a distinct measure of health literacy for obesity to guide policy, research, education, and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13904"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143397589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ka Kahe, Blandine Laferrère, Francisco X Castellanos, Yijia Zhang, Dariush Mozaffarian
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) has become one of the most widely used food additives in the global food supply. Although it has been classified for decades as a food ingredient that is generally recognized as safe, concerns about the health impacts of chronic MSG use, especially its potential effect on weight, are still ongoing. This comprehensive review summarizes the available human and animal evidence, highlighting potential mechanisms linking MSG use to weight gain or obesity, and discusses challenges and future research directions. Because of MSG intake worldwide as well as hidden MSG in food labeling, there is a pressing need for a mechanistic understanding of the health impacts of MSG use especially on weight. To generate robust scientific evidence and to clarify public concerns, rigorous mechanistic studies and randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted.
{"title":"Monosodium glutamate: A hidden risk factor for obesity?","authors":"Ka Kahe, Blandine Laferrère, Francisco X Castellanos, Yijia Zhang, Dariush Mozaffarian","doi":"10.1111/obr.13903","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13903","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monosodium glutamate (MSG) has become one of the most widely used food additives in the global food supply. Although it has been classified for decades as a food ingredient that is generally recognized as safe, concerns about the health impacts of chronic MSG use, especially its potential effect on weight, are still ongoing. This comprehensive review summarizes the available human and animal evidence, highlighting potential mechanisms linking MSG use to weight gain or obesity, and discusses challenges and future research directions. Because of MSG intake worldwide as well as hidden MSG in food labeling, there is a pressing need for a mechanistic understanding of the health impacts of MSG use especially on weight. To generate robust scientific evidence and to clarify public concerns, rigorous mechanistic studies and randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13903"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143363213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michelle Dever, Helen Skouteris, Angela C Incollingo Rodriguez, Haimanot Hailu, Emma Galvin, Briony Hill
Weight stigma presents a significant challenge for women throughout the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum (PPP) periods, manifesting in multiple areas of life, including interpersonal relationships, healthcare settings, and broader social contexts. This systematic review investigates weight stigma in women across their reproductive years, examining its impact, and exploring the socioecological factors that contribute to its persistence. We searched Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care (MIDIRS), and Global Health for peer-reviewed articles published since 2010. Of the 3486 records identified, 38 were included in a narrative synthesis. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore women's personal experiences of weight stigma. We then applied a socioecological lens to examine the interrelationships between individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal factors contributing to weight stigma. Five overarching themes were identified: (1) the impact of weight stigma on PPP women; (2) weight stigma experiences across the socioecological contexts; (3) coping strategies; (4) women's voices as a call to action; and (5) interrelationships of weight stigma contexts. Our findings provide critical insights into the multifaceted nature of weight stigma, highlighting the need for future research, and the development of practical strategies that prioritize women's perspectives, and challenge harmful societal norms for positive change.
{"title":"Weight stigma in the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods: A systematic review of women's perspectives.","authors":"Michelle Dever, Helen Skouteris, Angela C Incollingo Rodriguez, Haimanot Hailu, Emma Galvin, Briony Hill","doi":"10.1111/obr.13891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Weight stigma presents a significant challenge for women throughout the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum (PPP) periods, manifesting in multiple areas of life, including interpersonal relationships, healthcare settings, and broader social contexts. This systematic review investigates weight stigma in women across their reproductive years, examining its impact, and exploring the socioecological factors that contribute to its persistence. We searched Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Maternity and Infant Care (MIDIRS), and Global Health for peer-reviewed articles published since 2010. Of the 3486 records identified, 38 were included in a narrative synthesis. Inductive thematic analysis was used to explore women's personal experiences of weight stigma. We then applied a socioecological lens to examine the interrelationships between individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal factors contributing to weight stigma. Five overarching themes were identified: (1) the impact of weight stigma on PPP women; (2) weight stigma experiences across the socioecological contexts; (3) coping strategies; (4) women's voices as a call to action; and (5) interrelationships of weight stigma contexts. Our findings provide critical insights into the multifaceted nature of weight stigma, highlighting the need for future research, and the development of practical strategies that prioritize women's perspectives, and challenge harmful societal norms for positive change.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13891"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143121881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stevia is an intense, calorie-free sweetener that is frequently used to reduce energy intake; however, studies examining its effects on appetite and energy intake have produced mixed results, indicating that a definitive consensus has not yet been reached. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of stevia on appetite and energy intake in adults. The PROSPERO registration number for this research is CRD42023414411. The databases PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. In addition, the reference lists of extracted articles and pertinent reviews were examined. Two evaluators performed screening, quality assessment, and data extraction independently. Furthermore, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was employed to systematically assess the certainty level of the evidence presented in our study. Eleven clinical trials with a total of 428 participants were included. We found no significant changes in any appetite scores following stevia consumption (very low to moderate certainty of the evidence). Moreover, subgroup analyses demonstrated the scores of desires to eat increased significantly in the oral intake of stevia and not enteral intake subgroup (WMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.009, 0.89; P = 0.046). In addition, the number of studies reporting energy intake was limited, preventing a meta-analysis of this variable. In conclusion, stevia consumption has no significant effect on appetite scores in adults but it seems that more long-term clinical trials are needed to obtain more accurate results. PRACTITIONER POINT: Stevia, as a non-nutritive sweetener, has no significant effect on appetite scores in adults.
{"title":"Effects of stevia consumption on appetite in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Marzieh Zare, Mobina Zeinalabedini, Soraiya Ebrahimpour-Koujan, Leila Azadbakht","doi":"10.1111/obr.13902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13902","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stevia is an intense, calorie-free sweetener that is frequently used to reduce energy intake; however, studies examining its effects on appetite and energy intake have produced mixed results, indicating that a definitive consensus has not yet been reached. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the impact of stevia on appetite and energy intake in adults. The PROSPERO registration number for this research is CRD42023414411. The databases PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. In addition, the reference lists of extracted articles and pertinent reviews were examined. Two evaluators performed screening, quality assessment, and data extraction independently. Furthermore, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach was employed to systematically assess the certainty level of the evidence presented in our study. Eleven clinical trials with a total of 428 participants were included. We found no significant changes in any appetite scores following stevia consumption (very low to moderate certainty of the evidence). Moreover, subgroup analyses demonstrated the scores of desires to eat increased significantly in the oral intake of stevia and not enteral intake subgroup (WMD: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.009, 0.89; P = 0.046). In addition, the number of studies reporting energy intake was limited, preventing a meta-analysis of this variable. In conclusion, stevia consumption has no significant effect on appetite scores in adults but it seems that more long-term clinical trials are needed to obtain more accurate results. PRACTITIONER POINT: Stevia, as a non-nutritive sweetener, has no significant effect on appetite scores in adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13902"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143062695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tailane Scapin, Tara Boelsen-Robinson, Shaan Naughton, Jaithri Ananthapavan, Miranda Blake, Megan Ferguson, Clara Gomez-Donoso, Adyya Gupta, Victoria Hobbs, Emma Joy McMahon, Helena Romaniuk, Gary Sacks, Julia Thompson, Laura Alston, Kathryn Backholer, Rebecca Bennett, Julie Brimblecombe, Jasmine Chan, Katrine S Duus, Oliver Huse, Damian Maganja, Josephine Marshall, Liliana Orellana, Emalie Rosewarne, Sally Schultz, Katherine Sievert, Simone Sherriff, Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran, Carmen Vargas, Jason H Y Wu, Anna Peeters, Adrian J Cameron
Retail food environments play a pivotal role in influencing dietary behaviors, and therefore have huge potential as settings for promoting good nutrition and preventing obesity. Conducting research in retail settings can be challenging due to the varied motivations of the parties involved and the complex nature of retail environments. To improve the quality and consistency of research in this field, we have identified 16 thematic topics aimed at guiding researchers and public health practitioners on how to conduct healthy food retail research. A summary for each topic, encompassing existing methodologies, best practice examples, and knowledge gaps, was developed based on available literature and the collective experience and expertise of 32 multidisciplinary researchers from a high-income perspective engaged in healthy food retail research in a diverse range of retail settings. A summary checklist describing key considerations at each stage of conducting healthy food retail research was also developed.
{"title":"A best practice guide for conducting healthy food retail research: A resource for researchers and health promotion practitioners.","authors":"Tailane Scapin, Tara Boelsen-Robinson, Shaan Naughton, Jaithri Ananthapavan, Miranda Blake, Megan Ferguson, Clara Gomez-Donoso, Adyya Gupta, Victoria Hobbs, Emma Joy McMahon, Helena Romaniuk, Gary Sacks, Julia Thompson, Laura Alston, Kathryn Backholer, Rebecca Bennett, Julie Brimblecombe, Jasmine Chan, Katrine S Duus, Oliver Huse, Damian Maganja, Josephine Marshall, Liliana Orellana, Emalie Rosewarne, Sally Schultz, Katherine Sievert, Simone Sherriff, Huong Ngoc Quynh Tran, Carmen Vargas, Jason H Y Wu, Anna Peeters, Adrian J Cameron","doi":"10.1111/obr.13870","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retail food environments play a pivotal role in influencing dietary behaviors, and therefore have huge potential as settings for promoting good nutrition and preventing obesity. Conducting research in retail settings can be challenging due to the varied motivations of the parties involved and the complex nature of retail environments. To improve the quality and consistency of research in this field, we have identified 16 thematic topics aimed at guiding researchers and public health practitioners on how to conduct healthy food retail research. A summary for each topic, encompassing existing methodologies, best practice examples, and knowledge gaps, was developed based on available literature and the collective experience and expertise of 32 multidisciplinary researchers from a high-income perspective engaged in healthy food retail research in a diverse range of retail settings. A summary checklist describing key considerations at each stage of conducting healthy food retail research was also developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13870"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143062755","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara P Mambrini, Claudia Penzavecchia, Francesca Menichetti, Andrea Foppiani, Alessandro Leone, Marta Pellizzari, Federica Sileo, Alberto Battezzati, Simona Bertoli, Ramona De Amicis
The food system significantly affects the environment through land use, emissions from livestock, deforestation, and food waste. Diet sustainability considers the environmental effects of food production, distribution, and consumption. Animal products emit more greenhouse gases than plant-based foods, prompting a shift towards plant-focused diets for reduced emissions. Sustainable diets, like the EAT-Lancet model, prioritize plant-based foods, adjusting for regional eating habits. These diets aim to be both environmentally friendly and conducive to human health, addressing concerns like obesity and chronic diseases. Obesity is a major global health challenge, and its complex relationship with food production and consumption patterns calls for sustainable solutions to reduce pressure on ecosystems and promote healthier lifestyles. Tackling obesity requires holistic strategies that address not only individual health but also the broader environmental impacts of food systems. A systematic review examined the link between plant-based diets and obesity focusing on studies assessing Body Mass Index (BMI) and body fat assessment. Despite limited research, evidence suggests that adherence to a plant-based diet, particularly a healthy one, is associated with lower obesity rates. More longitudinal and intervention studies are necessary for a stronger consensus on the matter.
{"title":"Plant-based and sustainable diet: A systematic review of its impact on obesity.","authors":"Sara P Mambrini, Claudia Penzavecchia, Francesca Menichetti, Andrea Foppiani, Alessandro Leone, Marta Pellizzari, Federica Sileo, Alberto Battezzati, Simona Bertoli, Ramona De Amicis","doi":"10.1111/obr.13901","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13901","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The food system significantly affects the environment through land use, emissions from livestock, deforestation, and food waste. Diet sustainability considers the environmental effects of food production, distribution, and consumption. Animal products emit more greenhouse gases than plant-based foods, prompting a shift towards plant-focused diets for reduced emissions. Sustainable diets, like the EAT-Lancet model, prioritize plant-based foods, adjusting for regional eating habits. These diets aim to be both environmentally friendly and conducive to human health, addressing concerns like obesity and chronic diseases. Obesity is a major global health challenge, and its complex relationship with food production and consumption patterns calls for sustainable solutions to reduce pressure on ecosystems and promote healthier lifestyles. Tackling obesity requires holistic strategies that address not only individual health but also the broader environmental impacts of food systems. A systematic review examined the link between plant-based diets and obesity focusing on studies assessing Body Mass Index (BMI) and body fat assessment. Despite limited research, evidence suggests that adherence to a plant-based diet, particularly a healthy one, is associated with lower obesity rates. More longitudinal and intervention studies are necessary for a stronger consensus on the matter.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13901"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143062788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Immunotherapy is a crucial treatment for type 1 diabetes (T1D), yet analyses focusing on research priorities and trends in this field are limited. Therefore, this study employs bibliometric methods to systematically explore the current research status of immunotherapy for T1D.
Methods: Based on the Web of Science Core Collection Database, 1573 articles and review articles related to immunotherapy for T1D published from 2004 to 2023 were screened for bibliometric analysis. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R software were applied to comprehensively analyze the number of publications, journals, countries, authors, institutions, keywords, and references.
Results: In the past two decades, the global annual publication rate has seen a significant increase of 238.24%. Almost 40% of all publications have appeared in the last 5 years, accounting for over 50% of total citations. Journals such as Diabetes, Journal of Autoimmunity and Frontiers in Immunology have exerted substantial influence. Collaboration across nations has been notably strong, with the United States leading the way. The University of Florida is the most productive institution. Terms like "nivolumab," "ipilimumab," "pembrolizumab," and "immune checkpoint inhibitor(s)" gain considerable traction. The majority of research has clustered around themes such as immunomodulation, autoimmune diseases, immune checkpoint inhibitors, mesenchymal stem cells, and cell therapy. Precision medicine, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and nanotechnology are trending focal points in contemporary research.
Conclusion: The outcomes of the study are instrumental in enabling scholars to comprehend the evolving trajectory of immunotherapeutic approaches for T1D and facilitate the swift recognition of emerging research pathways.
{"title":"Exploring the progress and trends of immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis spanning nearly two decades.","authors":"Yixin Jiang, Zhou Xu, Yuting Wu, Xinglei Li, Jitao Ling, Yixuan Chen, Zicheng Zhu, Pingping Yang, Xiao Liu, Deju Zhang, Jianping Liu, Xiaoping Yin, Jing Zhang, Peng Yu","doi":"10.1111/obr.13888","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13888","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Immunotherapy is a crucial treatment for type 1 diabetes (T1D), yet analyses focusing on research priorities and trends in this field are limited. Therefore, this study employs bibliometric methods to systematically explore the current research status of immunotherapy for T1D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Web of Science Core Collection Database, 1573 articles and review articles related to immunotherapy for T1D published from 2004 to 2023 were screened for bibliometric analysis. VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R software were applied to comprehensively analyze the number of publications, journals, countries, authors, institutions, keywords, and references.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the past two decades, the global annual publication rate has seen a significant increase of 238.24%. Almost 40% of all publications have appeared in the last 5 years, accounting for over 50% of total citations. Journals such as Diabetes, Journal of Autoimmunity and Frontiers in Immunology have exerted substantial influence. Collaboration across nations has been notably strong, with the United States leading the way. The University of Florida is the most productive institution. Terms like \"nivolumab,\" \"ipilimumab,\" \"pembrolizumab,\" and \"immune checkpoint inhibitor(s)\" gain considerable traction. The majority of research has clustered around themes such as immunomodulation, autoimmune diseases, immune checkpoint inhibitors, mesenchymal stem cells, and cell therapy. Precision medicine, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and nanotechnology are trending focal points in contemporary research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The outcomes of the study are instrumental in enabling scholars to comprehend the evolving trajectory of immunotherapeutic approaches for T1D and facilitate the swift recognition of emerging research pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13888"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143051196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}