Research on Response Strategies for Inland Waterway Vessel Traffic Risk Based on Cost-Effect Trade-Offs

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MARINE Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.3390/jmse12091659
Yanyi Chen, Ziyang Ye, Tao Wang, Baiyuan Tang, Chengpeng Wan, Hao Zhang, Yunpeng Li
{"title":"Research on Response Strategies for Inland Waterway Vessel Traffic Risk Based on Cost-Effect Trade-Offs","authors":"Yanyi Chen, Ziyang Ye, Tao Wang, Baiyuan Tang, Chengpeng Wan, Hao Zhang, Yunpeng Li","doi":"10.3390/jmse12091659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared to maritime vessel traffic accidents, there is a scarcity of available, and only incomplete, accident data for inland waterway accidents. Additionally, the characteristics of different waterway segments vary significantly, and the factors affecting navigation safety risks and their mechanisms may also differ. Meanwhile, in recent years, extreme weather events have been frequent in inland waterways, and there has been a clear trend towards larger vessels, bringing about new safety hazards and management challenges. Currently, research on inland waterway navigation safety risks mainly focuses on risk assessment, with scarce quantitative studies on risk mitigation measures. This paper proposes a new method for improving inland waterway traffic safety, based on a cost-effectiveness trade-off approach to mitigate the risk of vessel traffic accidents. The method links the effectiveness and cost of measures and constructs a comprehensive cost-benefit evaluation model using fuzzy Bayesian and quantification conversion techniques, considering the reduction effects of risk mitigation measures under uncertain conditions and the various costs they may incur. Taking the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yangtze River as examples, this research evaluates key risk mitigation measures for different waterway segments and provides the most cost-effective strategies. Findings reveal that, even if different waterways share the same key risk sources, the most cost-effective measures vary due to environmental differences. Moreover, there is no inherent correlation between the best-performing measures in terms of benefits and the lowest-cost measures, nor are they necessarily recommended. The proposed method and case studies provide theoretical support for scientifically formulating risk mitigation measures in complex environments and offer guidance for inland waterway management departments to determine future key work directions.","PeriodicalId":16168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Science and Engineering","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared to maritime vessel traffic accidents, there is a scarcity of available, and only incomplete, accident data for inland waterway accidents. Additionally, the characteristics of different waterway segments vary significantly, and the factors affecting navigation safety risks and their mechanisms may also differ. Meanwhile, in recent years, extreme weather events have been frequent in inland waterways, and there has been a clear trend towards larger vessels, bringing about new safety hazards and management challenges. Currently, research on inland waterway navigation safety risks mainly focuses on risk assessment, with scarce quantitative studies on risk mitigation measures. This paper proposes a new method for improving inland waterway traffic safety, based on a cost-effectiveness trade-off approach to mitigate the risk of vessel traffic accidents. The method links the effectiveness and cost of measures and constructs a comprehensive cost-benefit evaluation model using fuzzy Bayesian and quantification conversion techniques, considering the reduction effects of risk mitigation measures under uncertain conditions and the various costs they may incur. Taking the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yangtze River as examples, this research evaluates key risk mitigation measures for different waterway segments and provides the most cost-effective strategies. Findings reveal that, even if different waterways share the same key risk sources, the most cost-effective measures vary due to environmental differences. Moreover, there is no inherent correlation between the best-performing measures in terms of benefits and the lowest-cost measures, nor are they necessarily recommended. The proposed method and case studies provide theoretical support for scientifically formulating risk mitigation measures in complex environments and offer guidance for inland waterway management departments to determine future key work directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于成本-效果权衡的内河船舶交通风险应对策略研究
与海上船舶交通事故相比,内河航道事故的可用数据很少,甚至不完整。此外,不同航段的特点差异较大,影响通航安全风险的因素及其机理也可能不同。同时,近年来内河航运极端天气事件频发,船舶大型化趋势明显,带来了新的安全隐患和管理挑战。目前,对内河航运安全风险的研究主要集中在风险评估方面,对风险缓解措施的定量研究较少。本文提出了一种基于成本效益权衡的改善内河航运安全的新方法,以降低船舶交通事故风险。该方法将措施的有效性和成本联系起来,采用模糊贝叶斯和量化转换技术,考虑不确定条件下风险缓解措施的降低效果和可能产生的各种成本,构建了一个综合成本效益评价模型。该研究以长江上、中、下游为例,评估了不同航段的主要风险缓解措施,并提供了最具成本效益的策略。研究结果表明,即使不同航道的主要风险源相同,但由于环境差异,最具成本效益的措施也不尽相同。此外,效益最好的措施与成本最低的措施之间没有内在联系,也不一定是推荐的措施。所提出的方法和案例研究为科学制定复杂环境下的风险缓解措施提供了理论支持,为内河航道管理部门确定未来重点工作方向提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Engineering-Ocean Engineering
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
20.70%
发文量
1640
审稿时长
18.09 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Marine Science and Engineering (JMSE; ISSN 2077-1312) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to marine science and engineering. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Source Range and Location Using Ship-Radiated Noise Measured by Two Vertical Line Arrays with a Feed-Forward Neural Network Uncertainty of Wave Spectral Shape and Parameters Associated with the Spectral Estimation Dynamic Response Analysis and Liquefaction Potential Evaluation of Riverbed Induced by Tidal Bore Thermodynamic Analysis of a Marine Diesel Engine Waste Heat-Assisted Cogeneration Power Plant Modified with Regeneration Onboard a Ship Performance of a Cable-Driven Robot Used for Cyber–Physical Testing of Floating Wind Turbines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1