Extensive allergic contact dermatitis to dexpanthenol with distant facial and symmetrical intertriginous involvement: An unusual clinical presentation

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Contact Dermatitis Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1111/cod.14693
Elisabeth Victoria Goessinger, Tamara Merkel, Sibylla Chantraine, Karin Hartmann
{"title":"Extensive allergic contact dermatitis to dexpanthenol with distant facial and symmetrical intertriginous involvement: An unusual clinical presentation","authors":"Elisabeth Victoria Goessinger,&nbsp;Tamara Merkel,&nbsp;Sibylla Chantraine,&nbsp;Karin Hartmann","doi":"10.1111/cod.14693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dexpanthenol, a derivative of panthothenic acid, is a common agent in wound-healing ointments, cosmetics and moisturising lotions due to its anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Its potential to cause allergic contact reactions is rare and is therefore often overlooked.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>A 38-year-old male technician presented with pruritic erythematous confluent papules and plaques on the ventral left forearm, left cubital fossa and left ventral abdomen with symmetrical exanthematous involvement of the intertriginous folds (Figure 1A–D). Periorbital oedema and oozing erythematous plaques with honey-yellow crusts were observed on the face and neck (Figure 1E).</p><p>He had previously applied Bepanthen® Plus Cream (containing dexpanthenol and chlorhexidine dihydrochloride) for 8 days to a newly engraved tattoo on his left lower forearm, where the rash was most severe. Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) was ruled out by lack of systemic drug use in the temporal context. Biopsy of the left arm revealed a spongiotic dermatitis compatible with disseminated eczema. Suspicion of secondary impetiginisation was confirmed by detection of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in cheek and ear swabs and colonisation of the nose. Intertriginous Candida infection was mycologically excluded.</p><p>Skin testing with repeated open application of Bepanthen® Plus Cream showed a clearly positive reaction with manifestation of erythematous papules and plaques after 24 h (Figure 2A). Antiseptic treatment with chlorhexidine digluconate and antibiotic- and steroid-containing cream was well tolerated. Skin Patch Testing was carried out according to the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) guidelines using Finn Chambers on Scanpor tape. The testallergens were provided by SmartPractice, especially chlorhexidin gluconat 0.5% in aqua and dexpanthenol 5% in petrolatum. Bepanthen® Plus and Bepanthen® Cream (Bayer, Switzerland AG, Zurich) were tested ‘as is’. Readings on day 2 and 3 showed type IV hypersensitivity only to dexpanthenol, confirming allergic contact dermatitis due to exposure to this ointment component (Figure 2B).</p><p>According to data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) in cooperation with the German Contact Allergy Group (DKG), only 1.2% of patients with dexpanthenol patch testing between 1992 and 1999 had a positive reaction.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Previous case reports in the literature predominantly describe only localised contact allergic reactions with regional spread, most commonly on the hands, face, and lower legs.<span><sup>1-4</sup></span> In contrast, our case demonstrates the potential of dexpanthenol-containing ointments to also induce extensive allergic contact reactions that can involve distant anatomical sites and even clinically imitate SDRIFE.</p><p>Thus, caution is warranted when applying hapten containing products to newly tattooed skin, as the tattoo injury may promote sensitization.<span><sup>5</sup></span> We also encourage the inclusion of dexpanthenol in the standardised patch test series for topical pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.</p><p>\n <b>Elisabeth Victoria Goessinger:</b> Writing – original draft; conceptualization; writing – review and editing. <b>Tamara Merkel:</b> Conceptualization; writing – review and editing. <b>Sibylla Chantraine:</b> Supervision; writing – review and editing. <b>Karin Hartmann:</b> Supervision; writing – review and editing; conceptualization.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":10527,"journal":{"name":"Contact Dermatitis","volume":"92 1","pages":"75-77"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cod.14693","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Dermatitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cod.14693","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexpanthenol, a derivative of panthothenic acid, is a common agent in wound-healing ointments, cosmetics and moisturising lotions due to its anti-inflammatory and regenerative properties.1 Its potential to cause allergic contact reactions is rare and is therefore often overlooked.1

A 38-year-old male technician presented with pruritic erythematous confluent papules and plaques on the ventral left forearm, left cubital fossa and left ventral abdomen with symmetrical exanthematous involvement of the intertriginous folds (Figure 1A–D). Periorbital oedema and oozing erythematous plaques with honey-yellow crusts were observed on the face and neck (Figure 1E).

He had previously applied Bepanthen® Plus Cream (containing dexpanthenol and chlorhexidine dihydrochloride) for 8 days to a newly engraved tattoo on his left lower forearm, where the rash was most severe. Symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) was ruled out by lack of systemic drug use in the temporal context. Biopsy of the left arm revealed a spongiotic dermatitis compatible with disseminated eczema. Suspicion of secondary impetiginisation was confirmed by detection of Staphylococcus aureus in cheek and ear swabs and colonisation of the nose. Intertriginous Candida infection was mycologically excluded.

Skin testing with repeated open application of Bepanthen® Plus Cream showed a clearly positive reaction with manifestation of erythematous papules and plaques after 24 h (Figure 2A). Antiseptic treatment with chlorhexidine digluconate and antibiotic- and steroid-containing cream was well tolerated. Skin Patch Testing was carried out according to the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG) guidelines using Finn Chambers on Scanpor tape. The testallergens were provided by SmartPractice, especially chlorhexidin gluconat 0.5% in aqua and dexpanthenol 5% in petrolatum. Bepanthen® Plus and Bepanthen® Cream (Bayer, Switzerland AG, Zurich) were tested ‘as is’. Readings on day 2 and 3 showed type IV hypersensitivity only to dexpanthenol, confirming allergic contact dermatitis due to exposure to this ointment component (Figure 2B).

According to data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) in cooperation with the German Contact Allergy Group (DKG), only 1.2% of patients with dexpanthenol patch testing between 1992 and 1999 had a positive reaction.2 Previous case reports in the literature predominantly describe only localised contact allergic reactions with regional spread, most commonly on the hands, face, and lower legs.1-4 In contrast, our case demonstrates the potential of dexpanthenol-containing ointments to also induce extensive allergic contact reactions that can involve distant anatomical sites and even clinically imitate SDRIFE.

Thus, caution is warranted when applying hapten containing products to newly tattooed skin, as the tattoo injury may promote sensitization.5 We also encourage the inclusion of dexpanthenol in the standardised patch test series for topical pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.

Elisabeth Victoria Goessinger: Writing – original draft; conceptualization; writing – review and editing. Tamara Merkel: Conceptualization; writing – review and editing. Sibylla Chantraine: Supervision; writing – review and editing. Karin Hartmann: Supervision; writing – review and editing; conceptualization.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
广泛的右泛醇过敏性接触性皮炎,面部和三叉神经间对称性受累:不寻常的临床表现
葡聚糖醇是泛酸的衍生物,由于其抗炎和再生的特性,它是伤口愈合软膏、化妆品和保湿乳液的常用成分它引起过敏接触反应的可能性很少,因此经常被忽视。1A, 38岁男性,技术人员,左前臂腹侧、左肘窝和左腹侧出现瘙痒性红斑性融合丘疹和斑块,并伴有对称的三间皱褶疹(图1A - d)。面部和颈部可见眼眶周围水肿和蜜黄色结痂的渗出性红斑斑块(图1E)。他之前曾将Bepanthen®Plus霜(含dexpanthenol和盐酸氯己定)涂抹在他左小臂新雕刻的纹身上8天,那里的皮疹最严重。对称性药物相关性三叉戟和弯曲性皮疹(SDRIFE)被排除在时间背景下缺乏系统性药物使用。左臂活检显示海绵状皮炎伴播散性湿疹。继发性脓疱化的怀疑是通过在脸颊和耳朵拭子中检测到金黄色葡萄球菌和鼻子的定植来证实的。真菌学排除了三叉间念珠菌感染。反复开放应用Bepanthen®Plus霜进行皮肤试验,24h后明显呈阳性反应,出现红斑丘疹和斑块(图2A)。用二光酸氯己定和含抗生素和类固醇的乳膏进行防腐治疗耐受性良好。根据德国接触性皮炎研究小组(DKG)的指导方针,使用芬恩钱伯斯在Scanpor胶带上进行皮肤贴片测试。试验变应原由SmartPractice提供,特别是氯己定葡萄糖(0.5%水)和葡聚糖(5%凡士林)。Bepanthen®Plus和Bepanthen®Cream(拜耳,瑞士股份公司,苏黎世)按原样进行测试。第2天和第3天的读数显示,IV型超敏反应仅对葡聚糖醇敏感,证实了由于暴露于这种软膏成分而引起的过敏性接触性皮炎(图2B)。根据皮肤科信息网络(IVDK)与德国接触性过敏组(DKG)合作的数据,1992年至1999年间,接受葡聚糖醇贴片试验的患者中只有1.2%有阳性反应以往文献中的病例报告主要描述了局部接触性过敏反应,具有区域性扩散,最常见于手、脸和小腿。1-4相反,我们的病例表明,含葡聚糖醇软膏也可能诱发广泛的过敏接触反应,可能涉及远处解剖部位,甚至在临床上模仿SDRIFE。因此,在将含有半抗原的产品应用于新纹身的皮肤时要谨慎,因为纹身损伤可能会促进过敏我们也鼓励在外用药品和化妆品的标准化贴片试验系列中纳入葡聚糖醇。伊丽莎白·维多利亚·戈辛格:写作-原稿;概念化;写作——审阅和编辑。塔玛拉·默克尔:概念化;写作——审阅和编辑。Sibylla Chantraine:监督;写作——审阅和编辑。卡琳·哈特曼:监督;写作——审阅和编辑;概念化。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contact Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis 医学-过敏
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
30.90%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contact Dermatitis is designed primarily as a journal for clinicians who are interested in various aspects of environmental dermatitis. This includes both allergic and irritant (toxic) types of contact dermatitis, occupational (industrial) dermatitis and consumers" dermatitis from such products as cosmetics and toiletries. The journal aims at promoting and maintaining communication among dermatologists, industrial physicians, allergists and clinical immunologists, as well as chemists and research workers involved in industry and the production of consumer goods. Papers are invited on clinical observations, diagnosis and methods of investigation of patients, therapeutic measures, organisation and legislation relating to the control of occupational and consumers".
期刊最新文献
Allergic Contact Dermatitis With Erythema Multiforme-Like Features Induced by Isoconazole Nitrate. Patch Testing With a Brazilian Propolis Series. Patch Testing in Paediatric Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Current Evidence and Clinical Implications. A Novel Case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis From Gaultheria procumbens Essential Oil in a Herbal Medical Ointment. Mapping of Former Strategies and Future Needs for Regulatory Prevention of Skin Sensitization: Cosmetic Products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1