Survival of the fastest? A descriptive analysis of severely injured trauma patients primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers in a Danish inclusive trauma system

Thea Palsgaard Møller, Josefine Tangen Jensen, Roar Borregaard Medici, Søren Steemann Rudolph, Lars Bredevang Andersen, Jakob Roed, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Helle Collatz Christensen, Mark Edwards
{"title":"Survival of the fastest? A descriptive analysis of severely injured trauma patients primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers in a Danish inclusive trauma system","authors":"Thea Palsgaard Møller, Josefine Tangen Jensen, Roar Borregaard Medici, Søren Steemann Rudolph, Lars Bredevang Andersen, Jakob Roed, Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg, Helle Collatz Christensen, Mark Edwards","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01265-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trauma systems are crucial for enhancing survival and quality of life for trauma patients. Understanding trauma triage and patient outcomes is essential for optimizing resource allocation and trauma care. The aim was to explore prehospital trauma triage in Region Zealand, Denmark. Specifically, characteristics for patients who were either primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers were described. A retrospective descriptive study of severely injured trauma patients was conducted from January 2017 to December 2021. The study comprised 744 patients including 55.6% primary and 44.4% secondary patients. Overall, men accounted for 70.2% of patients, and 66.1% were aged 18–65 years. The secondary patients included more women—34.2% versus 26.3% and a higher proportion of Injury Severity Score of ≥ 15—59.6% versus 47.8%, compared to primary patients. 30-day survival was higher for secondary patients—92.7% versus 87%. Medical dispatchers assessed urgency as Emergency level A for 98.1% of primary patients and 86.3% for secondary patients. Physician-staffed prehospital units attended primary patients first more frequently—17.1% versus 3.5%. Response times were similar, but time at scene was longer for primary patients whereas time from injury to arrival at a major trauma center was longer for secondary patients. Secondary trauma patients had higher Injury Severity Scores and better survival rates. They were considered less urgent by medical dispatchers and less frequently assessed by physician-staffed units. Prospective quality data are needed for further investigation of optimal triage and continuous quality improvement in trauma care.","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01265-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trauma systems are crucial for enhancing survival and quality of life for trauma patients. Understanding trauma triage and patient outcomes is essential for optimizing resource allocation and trauma care. The aim was to explore prehospital trauma triage in Region Zealand, Denmark. Specifically, characteristics for patients who were either primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to major trauma centers were described. A retrospective descriptive study of severely injured trauma patients was conducted from January 2017 to December 2021. The study comprised 744 patients including 55.6% primary and 44.4% secondary patients. Overall, men accounted for 70.2% of patients, and 66.1% were aged 18–65 years. The secondary patients included more women—34.2% versus 26.3% and a higher proportion of Injury Severity Score of ≥ 15—59.6% versus 47.8%, compared to primary patients. 30-day survival was higher for secondary patients—92.7% versus 87%. Medical dispatchers assessed urgency as Emergency level A for 98.1% of primary patients and 86.3% for secondary patients. Physician-staffed prehospital units attended primary patients first more frequently—17.1% versus 3.5%. Response times were similar, but time at scene was longer for primary patients whereas time from injury to arrival at a major trauma center was longer for secondary patients. Secondary trauma patients had higher Injury Severity Scores and better survival rates. They were considered less urgent by medical dispatchers and less frequently assessed by physician-staffed units. Prospective quality data are needed for further investigation of optimal triage and continuous quality improvement in trauma care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最快者生存?对丹麦包容性创伤系统中主要送往或其次转往主要创伤中心的严重创伤患者的描述性分析
创伤系统对提高创伤患者的生存率和生活质量至关重要。了解创伤分流和患者预后对于优化资源分配和创伤救治至关重要。该研究旨在探讨丹麦新西兰地区的院前创伤分流。具体来说,该研究描述了主要送往或次要转往主要创伤中心的患者的特征。2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,对严重受伤的创伤患者进行了一项回顾性描述研究。研究对象包括744名患者,其中55.6%为主要患者,44.4%为次要患者。总体而言,男性患者占 70.2%,66.1% 的患者年龄在 18-65 岁之间。与原发性患者相比,继发性患者中有更多女性--34.2%对26.3%,受伤严重程度评分≥15-59.6%对47.8%的比例更高。二级患者的 30 天存活率更高,为 92.7% 对 87%。医疗调度员将98.1%的一级患者和86.3%的二级患者的紧急程度评估为A级。由医生值班的院前医疗单位更频繁地首先救治初诊患者--17.1% 对 3.5%。响应时间相似,但初级患者在现场的时间更长,而二级患者从受伤到到达主要创伤中心的时间更长。二级创伤患者的受伤严重程度评分更高,存活率更高。医疗调度员认为他们的情况不那么紧急,由医生组成的小组也较少对他们进行评估。需要前瞻性的质量数据来进一步调查最佳分流和持续改进创伤护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patients' use of Danish emergency medical services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a register-based study Risk factors for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in mild traumatic brain injury patients at the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis Exploring ambulance clinicians’ clinical reasoning when training mass casualty incidents using virtual reality: a qualitative study Insights into epidemiological trends of severe chest injuries: an analysis of age, period, and cohort from 1990 to 2019 using the Global Burden of Disease study 2019 Workplace violence against healthcare workers in the emergency department — a 10-year retrospective single-center cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1