Optimizing the pterional approach in medial sphenoid wing meningioma: a detailed morphometric study on anterior clinoidectomy and its effect on operability score

Mahmoud Saad, Ali A. Mowafy, Ahmed R. Shalaby, Amr M. Shams, Mohamed Okasha
{"title":"Optimizing the pterional approach in medial sphenoid wing meningioma: a detailed morphometric study on anterior clinoidectomy and its effect on operability score","authors":"Mahmoud Saad, Ali A. Mowafy, Ahmed R. Shalaby, Amr M. Shams, Mohamed Okasha","doi":"10.1186/s41983-024-00882-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medial sphenoid wing meningiomas are best treated through pterional craniotomy, as pterional craniotomy provides wide and multidirectional exposure of the anterior and middle cranial fossa. Anterior clinoidectomy can increase the exposure potential. To delineate the role of anterior clinoidectomy (AC) in the standard pterional craniotomy approach through the evaluation of operability score measures (manoeuvrability arc, depth of surgical field, and surgical angle of attack). All patients with inner sphenoidal wing meningioma who underwent microsurgical excision between February 2022 and October 2023 were enrolled in the study. Preoperative and postoperative imaging studies (MR contrast studies and 3D thin-slice CT scans of the brain) were performed to determine the tumour size, extent, and pattern of optic canal involvement by comparing pre- and postoperative operability score parameters. Twenty-five patients met our inclusion criteria: 2 males (8%) and 23 females (92%). The mean age (SD) was 49.08 ± 6.42 years, with an age range of 39–60 years. The preoperative visual manifestations were as follows: eight patients (32%) had mild visual impairment, five patients (20%) had moderate visual impairment, six patients (24%) had severe visual impairment, and five patients (20%) had blindness. There was a significant positive correlation between the operability score and extent of resection (gross total resection was correlated with a higher operability score) (r = 0.301, n = 25, p = 0.005). A well-planned manoeuvrable arc allows neurosurgeons to perform surgery with precision, ultimately impacting surgical outcomes and the potential for complete tumour removal with minimal patient morbidity.","PeriodicalId":74995,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery","volume":"101-B 10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00882-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medial sphenoid wing meningiomas are best treated through pterional craniotomy, as pterional craniotomy provides wide and multidirectional exposure of the anterior and middle cranial fossa. Anterior clinoidectomy can increase the exposure potential. To delineate the role of anterior clinoidectomy (AC) in the standard pterional craniotomy approach through the evaluation of operability score measures (manoeuvrability arc, depth of surgical field, and surgical angle of attack). All patients with inner sphenoidal wing meningioma who underwent microsurgical excision between February 2022 and October 2023 were enrolled in the study. Preoperative and postoperative imaging studies (MR contrast studies and 3D thin-slice CT scans of the brain) were performed to determine the tumour size, extent, and pattern of optic canal involvement by comparing pre- and postoperative operability score parameters. Twenty-five patients met our inclusion criteria: 2 males (8%) and 23 females (92%). The mean age (SD) was 49.08 ± 6.42 years, with an age range of 39–60 years. The preoperative visual manifestations were as follows: eight patients (32%) had mild visual impairment, five patients (20%) had moderate visual impairment, six patients (24%) had severe visual impairment, and five patients (20%) had blindness. There was a significant positive correlation between the operability score and extent of resection (gross total resection was correlated with a higher operability score) (r = 0.301, n = 25, p = 0.005). A well-planned manoeuvrable arc allows neurosurgeons to perform surgery with precision, ultimately impacting surgical outcomes and the potential for complete tumour removal with minimal patient morbidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化内侧蝶骨翼脑膜瘤的翼状切口:关于前侧蝶骨翼切除术的详细形态计量学研究及其对可操作性评分的影响
内侧蝶骨翼脑膜瘤最好通过蝶骨开颅手术进行治疗,因为蝶骨开颅手术可以广泛、多方位地暴露前颅窝和中颅窝。前锁骨切除术可以增加暴露的可能性。通过评估可操作性评分指标(可操作性弧度、手术视野深度和手术攻角),明确前方颅骨簇切除术(AC)在标准翼状开颅手术中的作用。所有在2022年2月至2023年10月期间接受显微外科切除术的内侧蝶骨翼脑膜瘤患者均被纳入研究。通过比较术前和术后可手术性评分参数,进行术前和术后影像学检查(磁共振对比检查和脑部三维薄层 CT 扫描)以确定肿瘤大小、范围和视管受累模式。25名患者符合我们的纳入标准:其中男性 2 例(8%),女性 23 例(92%)。平均年龄(标清)为 49.08 ± 6.42 岁,年龄范围为 39-60 岁。术前视力表现如下:8 名患者(32%)有轻度视力障碍,5 名患者(20%)有中度视力障碍,6 名患者(24%)有重度视力障碍,5 名患者(20%)失明。可操作性评分与切除范围之间存在明显的正相关(总切除与较高的可操作性评分相关)(r = 0.301,n = 25,p = 0.005)。计划周密的可操控弧线可让神经外科医生精确地实施手术,最终影响手术效果,并有可能在将患者发病率降至最低的情况下完全切除肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for hypoechoic carotid plaque in healthy physical-examination population Unveiling the hidden connections: network analysis of depressive symptoms, internet addiction, and attachment in Chinese children and adolescents Neuropsychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with new-onset epilepsy Optimizing the pterional approach in medial sphenoid wing meningioma: a detailed morphometric study on anterior clinoidectomy and its effect on operability score Neuropsychiatric manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 during the second wave in Egypt
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1