Safety profile of trastuzumab originator vs biosimilars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Andrea Oliva, Cristina Scavone, Consiglia Riccardi, Francesca Futura Bernardi, Francesco Salvo, Annamaria Mascolo
{"title":"Safety profile of trastuzumab originator vs biosimilars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Andrea Oliva, Cristina Scavone, Consiglia Riccardi, Francesca Futura Bernardi, Francesco Salvo, Annamaria Mascolo","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03642-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>In the last decade trastuzumab biosimilars became more and more frequent. Among their uses, from several years, they have been available in Europe for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as an alternative to Herceptin®.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods/Patients</h3><p>This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the available literature with particular focus on phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing adverse events between trastuzumab biosimilar and originator. A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed and Scopus to include all phase 3 RCTs related to trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and published up to July 31, 2023. Of the 508 records identified, 14 articles were meta-analyzed for safety information, including serious treatment emergent adverse events, death-related adverse events, neutropenia, leukopenia, infections, increased ALT, increased AST, anti-drug antibody, and neutralizing antibody.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Included patients had an early breast cancer (N=2,877) or a metastatic breast cancer (N=2,603). No significant difference in death-related adverse events was found for trastuzumab biosimilar and originator when evaluated for an early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant phase (Risk Ratio [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-3.59; I2 = 0%; p = 0.57) and overall (RR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.11-1.66; I2 = 20%; p = 0.26), and for metastatic breast cancer (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.30-1.26; I2 = 0%; p = 0.85).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>No difference was also observed for all other safety outcomes as in accordance with clinical studies necessary for the registration and approval of a biosimilar at a European level.</p>","PeriodicalId":10166,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03642-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In the last decade trastuzumab biosimilars became more and more frequent. Among their uses, from several years, they have been available in Europe for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, as an alternative to Herceptin®.

Methods/Patients

This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the available literature with particular focus on phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing adverse events between trastuzumab biosimilar and originator. A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed and Scopus to include all phase 3 RCTs related to trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and published up to July 31, 2023. Of the 508 records identified, 14 articles were meta-analyzed for safety information, including serious treatment emergent adverse events, death-related adverse events, neutropenia, leukopenia, infections, increased ALT, increased AST, anti-drug antibody, and neutralizing antibody.

Results

Included patients had an early breast cancer (N=2,877) or a metastatic breast cancer (N=2,603). No significant difference in death-related adverse events was found for trastuzumab biosimilar and originator when evaluated for an early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant phase (Risk Ratio [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-3.59; I2 = 0%; p = 0.57) and overall (RR, 0.43; 95%CI, 0.11-1.66; I2 = 20%; p = 0.26), and for metastatic breast cancer (RR, 0.61; 95%CI, 0.30-1.26; I2 = 0%; p = 0.85).

Conclusions

No difference was also observed for all other safety outcomes as in accordance with clinical studies necessary for the registration and approval of a biosimilar at a European level.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲妥珠单抗原研药与生物仿制药的安全性对比:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的 在过去十年中,曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药的使用越来越频繁。方法/患者这项荟萃分析旨在分析现有文献,尤其侧重于比较曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药和原研药之间不良事件的 3 期随机临床试验 (RCT)。我们在Pubmed和Scopus上进行了系统性回顾,纳入了截至2023年7月31日发表的所有与曲妥珠单抗治疗HER2阳性乳腺癌患者相关的3期随机临床试验。在确定的508条记录中,对14篇文章的安全性信息进行了荟萃分析,包括严重治疗突发不良事件、死亡相关不良事件、中性粒细胞减少症、白细胞减少症、感染、谷丙转氨酶升高、谷草转氨酶升高、抗药抗体和中和抗体。结果纳入的患者有早期乳腺癌(N=2877)或转移性乳腺癌(N=2603)。在对早期乳腺癌进行新辅助治疗阶段(风险比 [RR],1.30;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.47-3.59;I2 = 0%;p = 0.57)和总体治疗阶段(RR,0.43;95%CI,0.11-1.66;I2 = 20%;p = 0.57)的死亡相关不良事件进行评估时,发现曲妥珠单抗生物仿制药与原研药无明显差异。结论根据在欧洲注册和批准生物类似药所需的临床研究,在所有其他安全性结果方面也未观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
lncSNHG16 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma development by inhibiting autophagy Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced biliary malignancy and associations between peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and clinical outcomes Emerging immunologic approaches as cancer anti-angiogenic therapies Safety profile of trastuzumab originator vs biosimilars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Construction and clinical significance of prognostic risk markers based on cancer driver genes in lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1