Bitchy ladies: domestic violence against ornatrices in Latin poetry—protest femininity, toxic femininity?

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 CLASSICS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1093/bics/qbae020
Marguerite Johnson
{"title":"Bitchy ladies: domestic violence against ornatrices in Latin poetry—protest femininity, toxic femininity?","authors":"Marguerite Johnson","doi":"10.1093/bics/qbae020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a revisionist historical environment in which scholars are increasingly invited to reconsider readings of classical texts from a philological perspective, or from an approach that privileges strict historicity, numerous interpretative possibilities present themselves. Working within such an environment, this study aims to delve into several literary expressions of domestic violence meted out to female slaves—explicitly, ornatrices—by female mistresses—particularly, elegiac dominae and satirical matronae—by combining the traditional methodologies of classical studies with theories of both protest femininity and toxic femininity. In so doing, it considers words and their meanings—notably the language of legalese as well as violence—and gender theories of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century—to read domestic violence among women as a cultural dynamic underpinned by patriarchal institutions that not only institutionalize the abuse of slaves but both initiate and permit it at the hands of disempowered females.","PeriodicalId":43661,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bics/qbae020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a revisionist historical environment in which scholars are increasingly invited to reconsider readings of classical texts from a philological perspective, or from an approach that privileges strict historicity, numerous interpretative possibilities present themselves. Working within such an environment, this study aims to delve into several literary expressions of domestic violence meted out to female slaves—explicitly, ornatrices—by female mistresses—particularly, elegiac dominae and satirical matronae—by combining the traditional methodologies of classical studies with theories of both protest femininity and toxic femininity. In so doing, it considers words and their meanings—notably the language of legalese as well as violence—and gender theories of the late twentieth century and early twenty-first century—to read domestic violence among women as a cultural dynamic underpinned by patriarchal institutions that not only institutionalize the abuse of slaves but both initiate and permit it at the hands of disempowered females.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贱女人:拉丁诗歌中针对ornatrices的家庭暴力--抗议女性气质,有毒的女性气质?
在修正主义的历史环境中,越来越多的学者被邀请从语言学的角度,或者从一种强调严格历史性的方法来重新考虑对古典文本的解读,在这种环境下,众多的解释可能性呈现出来。在这样的环境下,本研究旨在通过将古典研究的传统方法与抗议女性特质和有毒女性特质的理论相结合,深入探讨女主人对女奴--明确地说是ornatrices--实施家庭暴力的几种文学表达方式,尤其是挽歌式的 dominae 和讽刺式的 matronae。在这样做的过程中,该书考虑了词语及其含义--尤其是法律语言和暴力语言--以及 20 世纪末和 21 世纪初的性别理论,将妇女中的家庭暴力解读为父权体制下的一种文化动态,这种体制不仅将虐待奴隶制度化,而且还发起并允许无权女性实施虐待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tale of two Octavias: historical empathy and intimate partner ‘violence’ The abuse of aged parents in the ancient Roman world ‘Start with the cage’: coercive control and the Roman husband The farmer wants a wife: ecofeminism, domestic violence, and coercive control in Roman agricultural writing The princeps investigates: two cases of domestic violence in Tacitus’ Annals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1