{"title":"Dark Mode or Light Mode? Exploring the Impact of Contrast Polarity on Visualization Performance Between Age Groups","authors":"Zack While, Ali Sarvghad","doi":"arxiv-2409.10841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of positive and negative contrast polarities\n(i.e., light and dark modes) on the performance of younger adults and people in\ntheir late adulthood (PLA). In a crowdsourced study with 134 participants (69\nbelow age 60, 66 aged 60 and above), we assessed their accuracy and time\nperforming analysis tasks across three common visualization types (Bar, Line,\nScatterplot) and two contrast polarities (positive and negative). We observed\nthat, across both age groups, the polarity that led to better performance and\nthe resulting amount of improvement varied on an individual basis, with each\npolarity benefiting comparable proportions of participants. However, the\ncontrast polarity that led to better performance did not always match their\npreferred polarity. Additionally, we observed that the choice of contrast\npolarity can have an impact on time similar to that of the choice of\nvisualization type, resulting in an average percent difference of around 36%.\nThese findings indicate that, overall, the effects of contrast polarity on\nvisual analysis performance do not noticeably change with age. Furthermore,\nthey underscore the importance of making visualizations available in both\ncontrast polarities to better-support a broad audience with differing needs.\nSupplementary materials for this work can be found at\n\\url{https://osf.io/539a4/}.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines the impact of positive and negative contrast polarities
(i.e., light and dark modes) on the performance of younger adults and people in
their late adulthood (PLA). In a crowdsourced study with 134 participants (69
below age 60, 66 aged 60 and above), we assessed their accuracy and time
performing analysis tasks across three common visualization types (Bar, Line,
Scatterplot) and two contrast polarities (positive and negative). We observed
that, across both age groups, the polarity that led to better performance and
the resulting amount of improvement varied on an individual basis, with each
polarity benefiting comparable proportions of participants. However, the
contrast polarity that led to better performance did not always match their
preferred polarity. Additionally, we observed that the choice of contrast
polarity can have an impact on time similar to that of the choice of
visualization type, resulting in an average percent difference of around 36%.
These findings indicate that, overall, the effects of contrast polarity on
visual analysis performance do not noticeably change with age. Furthermore,
they underscore the importance of making visualizations available in both
contrast polarities to better-support a broad audience with differing needs.
Supplementary materials for this work can be found at
\url{https://osf.io/539a4/}.