Dark Mode or Light Mode? Exploring the Impact of Contrast Polarity on Visualization Performance Between Age Groups

Zack While, Ali Sarvghad
{"title":"Dark Mode or Light Mode? Exploring the Impact of Contrast Polarity on Visualization Performance Between Age Groups","authors":"Zack While, Ali Sarvghad","doi":"arxiv-2409.10841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of positive and negative contrast polarities\n(i.e., light and dark modes) on the performance of younger adults and people in\ntheir late adulthood (PLA). In a crowdsourced study with 134 participants (69\nbelow age 60, 66 aged 60 and above), we assessed their accuracy and time\nperforming analysis tasks across three common visualization types (Bar, Line,\nScatterplot) and two contrast polarities (positive and negative). We observed\nthat, across both age groups, the polarity that led to better performance and\nthe resulting amount of improvement varied on an individual basis, with each\npolarity benefiting comparable proportions of participants. However, the\ncontrast polarity that led to better performance did not always match their\npreferred polarity. Additionally, we observed that the choice of contrast\npolarity can have an impact on time similar to that of the choice of\nvisualization type, resulting in an average percent difference of around 36%.\nThese findings indicate that, overall, the effects of contrast polarity on\nvisual analysis performance do not noticeably change with age. Furthermore,\nthey underscore the importance of making visualizations available in both\ncontrast polarities to better-support a broad audience with differing needs.\nSupplementary materials for this work can be found at\n\\url{https://osf.io/539a4/}.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of positive and negative contrast polarities (i.e., light and dark modes) on the performance of younger adults and people in their late adulthood (PLA). In a crowdsourced study with 134 participants (69 below age 60, 66 aged 60 and above), we assessed their accuracy and time performing analysis tasks across three common visualization types (Bar, Line, Scatterplot) and two contrast polarities (positive and negative). We observed that, across both age groups, the polarity that led to better performance and the resulting amount of improvement varied on an individual basis, with each polarity benefiting comparable proportions of participants. However, the contrast polarity that led to better performance did not always match their preferred polarity. Additionally, we observed that the choice of contrast polarity can have an impact on time similar to that of the choice of visualization type, resulting in an average percent difference of around 36%. These findings indicate that, overall, the effects of contrast polarity on visual analysis performance do not noticeably change with age. Furthermore, they underscore the importance of making visualizations available in both contrast polarities to better-support a broad audience with differing needs. Supplementary materials for this work can be found at \url{https://osf.io/539a4/}.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
黑暗模式还是光明模式?探索对比极性对不同年龄组视觉表现的影响
本研究探讨了正负对比度极性(即明暗模式)对年轻成年人和晚年成年人(PLA)的学习成绩的影响。在一项有 134 名参与者(69 名 60 岁以下,66 名 60 岁及以上)参加的众包研究中,我们评估了他们在三种常见可视化类型(条形图、线形图和散点图)和两种对比度极性(正对比度和负对比度)下执行分析任务的准确性和时间。我们观察到,在这两个年龄组中,导致更好表现的极性以及由此带来的改善程度因人而异,每种极性都能使相当比例的参与者受益。然而,能提高成绩的对比极性并不总是与他们偏好的极性相匹配。此外,我们还观察到,对比度极性的选择对时间的影响与可视化类型的选择类似,造成的平均百分比差异约为 36%。这些发现表明,总体而言,对比度极性对视觉分析成绩的影响不会随着年龄的增长而发生明显变化。此外,它们还强调了提供两种对比度极性的可视化的重要性,以便更好地支持具有不同需求的广大受众。这项工作的补充材料可在以下网址找到:url{https://osf.io/539a4/}。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equimetrics -- Applying HAR principles to equestrian activities AI paintings vs. Human Paintings? Deciphering Public Interactions and Perceptions towards AI-Generated Paintings on TikTok From Data Stories to Dialogues: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Generative AI Agents and Data Storytelling in Enhancing Data Visualisation Comprehension Exploring Gaze Pattern in Autistic Children: Clustering, Visualization, and Prediction Revealing the Challenge of Detecting Character Knowledge Errors in LLM Role-Playing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1