{"title":"Improving governance outcomes through AI documentation: Bridging theory and practice","authors":"Amy A. Winecoff, Miranda Bogen","doi":"arxiv-2409.08960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Documentation plays a crucial role in both external accountability and\ninternal governance of AI systems. Although there are many proposals for\ndocumenting AI data, models, systems, and methods, the ways these practices\nenhance governance as well as the challenges practitioners and organizations\nface with documentation remain underexplored. In this paper, we analyze 37\nproposed documentation frameworks and 21 empirical studies evaluating their\nuse. We identify potential hypotheses about how documentation can strengthen\ngovernance, such as informing stakeholders about AI risks and usage, fostering\ncollaboration, encouraging ethical reflection, and reinforcing best practices.\nHowever, empirical evidence shows that practitioners often encounter obstacles\nthat prevent documentation from achieving these goals. We also highlight key\nconsiderations for organizations when designing documentation, such as\ndetermining the appropriate level of detail and balancing automation in the\nprocess. Finally, we offer recommendations for further research and for\nimplementing effective documentation practices in real-world contexts.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Documentation plays a crucial role in both external accountability and
internal governance of AI systems. Although there are many proposals for
documenting AI data, models, systems, and methods, the ways these practices
enhance governance as well as the challenges practitioners and organizations
face with documentation remain underexplored. In this paper, we analyze 37
proposed documentation frameworks and 21 empirical studies evaluating their
use. We identify potential hypotheses about how documentation can strengthen
governance, such as informing stakeholders about AI risks and usage, fostering
collaboration, encouraging ethical reflection, and reinforcing best practices.
However, empirical evidence shows that practitioners often encounter obstacles
that prevent documentation from achieving these goals. We also highlight key
considerations for organizations when designing documentation, such as
determining the appropriate level of detail and balancing automation in the
process. Finally, we offer recommendations for further research and for
implementing effective documentation practices in real-world contexts.