AI and disability: A systematic scoping review

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1177/14604582241285743
Christo El Morr, Bushra Kundi, Fariah Mobeen, Sarah Taleghani, Yahya El-Lahib, Rachel Gorman
{"title":"AI and disability: A systematic scoping review","authors":"Christo El Morr, Bushra Kundi, Fariah Mobeen, Sarah Taleghani, Yahya El-Lahib, Rachel Gorman","doi":"10.1177/14604582241285743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance life experiences and present challenges for people with disabilities. Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between AI and disability, exploring the potential benefits and challenges of using AI for people with disabilities. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using eight online databases; 45 scholarly articles from the last 5 years were identified and selected for thematic analysis. Results: The review’s findings revealed AI’s potential to enhance healthcare; however, it showed a high prevalence of a narrow medical model of disability and an ableist perspective in AI research. This raises concerns about the perpetuation of biases and discrimination against individuals with disabilities in the development and deployment of AI technologies. Conclusion: We recommend shifting towards a social model of disability, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, addressing AI bias and discrimination, prioritizing privacy and security in AI development, focusing on accessibility and usability, investing in education and training, and advocating for robust policy and regulatory frameworks. The review emphasizes the urgent need for further research to ensure that AI benefits all members of society equitably and that future AI systems are designed with inclusivity and accessibility as core principles.","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241285743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance life experiences and present challenges for people with disabilities. Objectives: This study aims to investigate the relationship between AI and disability, exploring the potential benefits and challenges of using AI for people with disabilities. Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted using eight online databases; 45 scholarly articles from the last 5 years were identified and selected for thematic analysis. Results: The review’s findings revealed AI’s potential to enhance healthcare; however, it showed a high prevalence of a narrow medical model of disability and an ableist perspective in AI research. This raises concerns about the perpetuation of biases and discrimination against individuals with disabilities in the development and deployment of AI technologies. Conclusion: We recommend shifting towards a social model of disability, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration, addressing AI bias and discrimination, prioritizing privacy and security in AI development, focusing on accessibility and usability, investing in education and training, and advocating for robust policy and regulatory frameworks. The review emphasizes the urgent need for further research to ensure that AI benefits all members of society equitably and that future AI systems are designed with inclusivity and accessibility as core principles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能与残疾:系统性范围界定审查
背景:人工智能(AI)可以提升残疾人的生活体验,同时也给他们带来了挑战。研究目的本研究旨在调查人工智能与残疾之间的关系,探索残疾人使用人工智能的潜在益处和挑战。研究方法使用 8 个在线数据库进行了系统性的范围界定审查;确定了过去 5 年中的 45 篇学术文章,并挑选出这些文章进行专题分析。结果综述结果表明,人工智能具有提高医疗保健水平的潜力;但是,综述结果表明,在人工智能研究中,狭隘的残疾医学模式和能力主义观点非常普遍。这引发了人们对人工智能技术的开发和应用中针对残疾人的偏见和歧视长期存在的担忧。结论:我们建议转向残疾的社会模式,促进跨学科合作,解决人工智能偏见和歧视问题,在人工智能开发中优先考虑隐私和安全问题,关注可访问性和可用性,投资于教育和培训,并倡导健全的政策和监管框架。审查强调,迫切需要开展进一步研究,以确保人工智能公平地惠及社会所有成员,并确保未来人工智能系统的设计以包容性和无障碍性为核心原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Demonstrating the data integrity of routinely collected healthcare systems data for clinical trials (DEDICaTe): A proof-of-concept study AI and disability: A systematic scoping review Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for predicting diarrhea among under-five children in Ethiopia: Evidence from 2016 EDHS Machine learning approaches for asthma disease prediction among adults in Sri Lanka Artificial intelligence and health information: A bibliometric analysis of three decades of research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1