Xuan Ma, Baolan Ji, Wenhua Du, Shuwei Shi, Hongyan Zhao, Jie Sheng, Xinghe Jiang, Bo Ban, Guanqi Gao
{"title":"METS-IR, a Novel Simple Insulin Resistance Index, is Associated with NAFLD in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Xuan Ma, Baolan Ji, Wenhua Du, Shuwei Shi, Hongyan Zhao, Jie Sheng, Xinghe Jiang, Bo Ban, Guanqi Gao","doi":"10.2147/dmso.s476398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> Substantial evidence has established a strong association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and insulin resistance (IR). Insulin resistance metabolic score (METS-IR) is a new and more effective comprehensive indicator for measuring IR. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between METS-IR and NAFLD in T2DM population.<br/><strong>Patients and methods:</strong> This cross-sectional study included 1097 adult patients with T2DM. Anthropometric measurements and biochemical indicators were collected, and the NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasound. The METS-IR was calculated. Based on the presence of NAFLD, the population was divided into non-NAFLD and NAFLD groups. The relationship between METS-IR and NAFLD was evaluated.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Compared with the non-NAFLD group, the METS-IR was higher in the NAFLD group (P < 0.001). The incidence rate of NAFLD increased across the quartiles of the METS-IR (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis showed that METS-IR was positively correlated with NAFLD (Correlation Coefficient: 0.441, P < 0.001). The binary logistic regression analysis indicated that METS-IR was independently associated with NAFLD (OR: 1.120, 95% CI 1.080– 1.161). Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the METS-IR was 0.781 (95% CI 0.746– 0.817) and relatively higher than other evaluation variables.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> In patients with T2DM, METS-IR is closely associated with NAFLD, and might be a valuable predictor of NAFLD. Further research is needed to verify this association.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> Type 2 diabetes mellitus, NAFLD, insulin resistance, METS-IR<br/>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/dmso.s476398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Substantial evidence has established a strong association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and insulin resistance (IR). Insulin resistance metabolic score (METS-IR) is a new and more effective comprehensive indicator for measuring IR. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between METS-IR and NAFLD in T2DM population. Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included 1097 adult patients with T2DM. Anthropometric measurements and biochemical indicators were collected, and the NAFLD was diagnosed by ultrasound. The METS-IR was calculated. Based on the presence of NAFLD, the population was divided into non-NAFLD and NAFLD groups. The relationship between METS-IR and NAFLD was evaluated. Results: Compared with the non-NAFLD group, the METS-IR was higher in the NAFLD group (P < 0.001). The incidence rate of NAFLD increased across the quartiles of the METS-IR (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis showed that METS-IR was positively correlated with NAFLD (Correlation Coefficient: 0.441, P < 0.001). The binary logistic regression analysis indicated that METS-IR was independently associated with NAFLD (OR: 1.120, 95% CI 1.080– 1.161). Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the METS-IR was 0.781 (95% CI 0.746– 0.817) and relatively higher than other evaluation variables. Conclusion: In patients with T2DM, METS-IR is closely associated with NAFLD, and might be a valuable predictor of NAFLD. Further research is needed to verify this association.
Keywords: Type 2 diabetes mellitus, NAFLD, insulin resistance, METS-IR