Unilateral neck treatment with either surgery and/or radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma for the tonsil.

ORL Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1159/000541390
Niema B Razavian,Joshua D Waltonen,Cole R Steber,Rachel F Shenker,Nelson H May,Jae H Yang,Claire M Lanier,Kathryn M Greven,Bart A Frizzell,Ryan T Hughes
{"title":"Unilateral neck treatment with either surgery and/or radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma for the tonsil.","authors":"Niema B Razavian,Joshua D Waltonen,Cole R Steber,Rachel F Shenker,Nelson H May,Jae H Yang,Claire M Lanier,Kathryn M Greven,Bart A Frizzell,Ryan T Hughes","doi":"10.1159/000541390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nStrategies for treatment of tonsil carcinoma are under active investigation. Limiting surgical and radiation treatment volumes to the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck in appropriately selected patients is one such approach. Here, we present our institutional experience with treatment through ipsilateral surgical or radiotherapeutic neck management.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe retrospectively reviewed our institutional database of patients with tonsil carcinoma treated from 2012 to 2020. Patients were included for analysis if they received definitive radiation therapy (RT), definitive surgery (S), or surgery with post-operative radiation therapy (S-PORT) and whose treatment volumes were limited to the primary tumor and involved/elective ipsilateral neck. Patients who received radiation and/or surgery to the contralateral neck (including those with bilateral nodal involvement), as well as patients with metastatic disease, were excluded. Clinical factors including T- and N-stage (AJCC 7th edition), and HPV status (by p16 and/or HPV DNA PCR) were recorded, as were pathologic factors (when applicable) including margin status, extracapsular extension (ECE), lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) at 2 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nIn total, 71 patients were treated with unilateral neck approaches: S (n=49), RT (n=10), and S+PORT (n=12). Among these patients, 32, 36, and 3 had T1, T2, and T3 disease, respectively. N-stage was N0, N1, N2a, N2b, and N3 in 22, 20, 5, 23, and 1 patient(s), respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 12 patients. From those with recorded risk factors, 86% were HPV-positive, 20% had LVSI, 7% had PNI, 13% had ECE, and 5% had positive margins. From a median follow-up of 27 months, local, regional, and distant failures occurred in 5, 6, and 5 patients, respectively. No contralateral neck failures were recorded. At 2 years, OS, PFS, and LRC were 92% (95% CI 85-99%), 85% (95% CI 75-95%), and 88% (95% CI 80-98%), respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIn patients with early T-stage tonsil carcinoma, treatment of the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck is associated with acceptable OS, PFS, and LRC. In this population, the risk of contralateral neck failure is likely very low regardless of primary treatment modality. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of limiting treatment extent to the unilateral neck.","PeriodicalId":501501,"journal":{"name":"ORL","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Strategies for treatment of tonsil carcinoma are under active investigation. Limiting surgical and radiation treatment volumes to the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck in appropriately selected patients is one such approach. Here, we present our institutional experience with treatment through ipsilateral surgical or radiotherapeutic neck management. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our institutional database of patients with tonsil carcinoma treated from 2012 to 2020. Patients were included for analysis if they received definitive radiation therapy (RT), definitive surgery (S), or surgery with post-operative radiation therapy (S-PORT) and whose treatment volumes were limited to the primary tumor and involved/elective ipsilateral neck. Patients who received radiation and/or surgery to the contralateral neck (including those with bilateral nodal involvement), as well as patients with metastatic disease, were excluded. Clinical factors including T- and N-stage (AJCC 7th edition), and HPV status (by p16 and/or HPV DNA PCR) were recorded, as were pathologic factors (when applicable) including margin status, extracapsular extension (ECE), lymphovascular invasion (LVSI), and perineural invasion (PNI). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LRC) at 2 years were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS In total, 71 patients were treated with unilateral neck approaches: S (n=49), RT (n=10), and S+PORT (n=12). Among these patients, 32, 36, and 3 had T1, T2, and T3 disease, respectively. N-stage was N0, N1, N2a, N2b, and N3 in 22, 20, 5, 23, and 1 patient(s), respectively. Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 12 patients. From those with recorded risk factors, 86% were HPV-positive, 20% had LVSI, 7% had PNI, 13% had ECE, and 5% had positive margins. From a median follow-up of 27 months, local, regional, and distant failures occurred in 5, 6, and 5 patients, respectively. No contralateral neck failures were recorded. At 2 years, OS, PFS, and LRC were 92% (95% CI 85-99%), 85% (95% CI 75-95%), and 88% (95% CI 80-98%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with early T-stage tonsil carcinoma, treatment of the primary tumor and ipsilateral neck is associated with acceptable OS, PFS, and LRC. In this population, the risk of contralateral neck failure is likely very low regardless of primary treatment modality. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the impact of limiting treatment extent to the unilateral neck.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扁桃体鳞状细胞癌的单侧颈部治疗,包括手术和/或放疗。
扁桃体癌的治疗策略正在积极研究中。在适当选择的患者中,将手术和放射治疗范围限制在原发肿瘤和同侧颈部是其中一种方法。在此,我们介绍了本院通过同侧手术或放射治疗颈部的治疗经验。方法我们回顾性地查看了本院数据库中 2012 年至 2020 年接受治疗的扁桃体癌患者。如果患者接受了确定性放疗(RT)、确定性手术(S)或术后放疗手术(S-PORT),且治疗范围仅限于原发肿瘤和受累/选择性同侧颈部,则纳入分析范围。对侧颈部接受放射治疗和/或手术的患者(包括双侧结节受累的患者)以及转移性疾病患者均被排除在外。临床因素包括T期和N期(AJCC第7版)、HPV状态(通过p16和/或HPV DNA PCR),病理因素(如适用)包括边缘状态、囊外扩展(ECE)、淋巴管侵犯(LVSI)和神经周围侵犯(PNI)。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估算了 2 年的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部区域控制率(LRC):S(49例)、RT(10例)和S+PORT(12例)。在这些患者中,T1、T2 和 T3 疾病患者分别为 32 人、36 人和 3 人。N分期为N0、N1、N2a、N2b和N3的患者分别有22人、20人、5人、23人和1人。12名患者同时接受了化疗。在有风险因素记录的患者中,86%为HPV阳性,20%为LVSI,7%为PNI,13%为ECE,5%为边缘阳性。在 27 个月的中位随访中,分别有 5、6 和 5 名患者出现局部、区域和远处失败。没有对侧颈部手术失败的记录。2年后,OS、PFS和LRC分别为92%(95% CI 85-99%)、85%(95% CI 75-95%)和88%(95% CI 80-98%)。在这一人群中,无论采用哪种主要治疗方式,对侧颈部失败的风险可能都很低。需要进行更多的前瞻性研究,以确定将治疗范围限制在单侧颈部的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ORL
ORL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unilateral neck treatment with either surgery and/or radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma for the tonsil. Contents Vol. 84, 2022 Acknowledgement to Reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1