The predictive association between social support, communal mastery, and response to culturally adapted cognitive processing therapy among Native American women

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of traumatic stress Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1002/jts.23101
Katherine van Stolk‐Cooke, Zoe M. F. Brier, Cynthia Pearson, Matthew Price, Debra Kaysen
{"title":"The predictive association between social support, communal mastery, and response to culturally adapted cognitive processing therapy among Native American women","authors":"Katherine van Stolk‐Cooke, Zoe M. F. Brier, Cynthia Pearson, Matthew Price, Debra Kaysen","doi":"10.1002/jts.23101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though social support (SS) and communal mastery (CM) are resilience factors among American Indian and Alaska Natives (AIAN), they have not been examined as trauma treatment predictors in this at‐risk group. This study evaluated whether SS and CM were associated with improved treatment response in a sample of 73 AIAN women with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Participants received culturally adapted CPT and were assessed for PTSD, CM, and SS. Data were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models. SS predicted improved PTSD, β = −.16, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .05, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .003, and mental health, β = .16, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .05, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .005, but not physical health. CM predicted improved PTSD, β = −.93, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .34, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .008; mental health, β = .90, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .36, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .013; and physical health, β = .95, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .31, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .003. In a combined model, SS predicted improvements in PTSD, β = −.15, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .04, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .001, and mental health, β = .12, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .06, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .037, whereas CM did not. CM predicted improved physical health, β = 1.04, <jats:italic>SE</jats:italic> = .33, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .003, whereas SS did not. Results highlight the benefits of SS and CM in trauma treatment outcomes for AIAN women, consistent with prior work, and further underscore the differential role of SS versus CM on mental versus physical health. Future work should explore how orientation to close and communal‐level relationships may inform the protective benefits of social resources among AIAN.","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Though social support (SS) and communal mastery (CM) are resilience factors among American Indian and Alaska Natives (AIAN), they have not been examined as trauma treatment predictors in this at‐risk group. This study evaluated whether SS and CM were associated with improved treatment response in a sample of 73 AIAN women with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Participants received culturally adapted CPT and were assessed for PTSD, CM, and SS. Data were analyzed using linear mixed‐effects models. SS predicted improved PTSD, β = −.16, SE = .05, p = .003, and mental health, β = .16, SE = .05, p = .005, but not physical health. CM predicted improved PTSD, β = −.93, SE = .34, p = .008; mental health, β = .90, SE = .36, p = .013; and physical health, β = .95, SE = .31, p = .003. In a combined model, SS predicted improvements in PTSD, β = −.15, SE = .04, p < .001, and mental health, β = .12, SE = .06, p = .037, whereas CM did not. CM predicted improved physical health, β = 1.04, SE = .33, p = .003, whereas SS did not. Results highlight the benefits of SS and CM in trauma treatment outcomes for AIAN women, consistent with prior work, and further underscore the differential role of SS versus CM on mental versus physical health. Future work should explore how orientation to close and communal‐level relationships may inform the protective benefits of social resources among AIAN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国原住民妇女中社会支持、社区掌握和对文化适应性认知处理疗法的反应之间的预测关联
虽然社会支持(SS)和社区掌握(CM)是美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)的抗逆因素,但还没有将它们作为这一高风险群体的创伤治疗预测因素进行过研究。本研究对 73 名具有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的美国印第安和阿拉斯加原住民妇女样本进行了评估,以确定 SS 和 CM 是否与治疗反应的改善有关。参与者接受了文化适应性 CPT,并对创伤后应激障碍、CM 和 SS 进行了评估。数据采用线性混合效应模型进行分析。SS 预测创伤后应激障碍的改善(β = -.16,SE = .05,p = .003)和心理健康的改善(β = .16,SE = .05,p = .005),但不预测身体健康的改善。CM可预测创伤后应激障碍的改善,β = -.93,SE = .34,p = .008;可预测心理健康的改善,β = .90,SE = .36,p = .013;可预测身体健康的改善,β = .95,SE = .31,p = .003。在综合模型中,SS 预测了创伤后应激障碍的改善,β = -.15,SE = .04,p = .001;预测了心理健康的改善,β = .12,SE = .06,p = .037,而 CM 则没有。CM 预测身体健康会得到改善,β = 1.04,SE = .33,p = .003,而 SS 预测身体健康不会得到改善。研究结果凸显了 SS 和 CM 对亚裔美国妇女创伤治疗结果的益处,这与之前的研究结果一致,并进一步强调了 SS 和 CM 对心理健康和身体健康的不同作用。未来的工作应探索亲密关系和社区关系的取向如何为亚裔美国人提供社会资源的保护性益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
期刊最新文献
Royal Canadian Mounted Police cadets' exposure to potentially psychologically traumatic events during the Cadet Training Program. Exploring the association between moral injury and posttraumatic stress symptoms among Canadian public safety personnel. Identifying transdiagnostic traumatic stress reactions in U.S. military veterans: A nationally representative study. Issue Information - TOC Correction to Posttraumatic Growth fter MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1