Improving the Solution of Indefinite Quadratic Programs and Linear Programs with Complementarity Constraints by a Progressive MIP Method

Xinyao Zhang, Shaoning Han, Jong-Shi Pang
{"title":"Improving the Solution of Indefinite Quadratic Programs and Linear Programs with Complementarity Constraints by a Progressive MIP Method","authors":"Xinyao Zhang, Shaoning Han, Jong-Shi Pang","doi":"arxiv-2409.09964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indefinite quadratic programs (QPs) are known to be very difficult to be\nsolved to global optimality, so are linear programs with linear complementarity\nconstraints. Treating the former as a subclass of the latter, this paper\npresents a progressive mixed integer linear programming method for solving a\ngeneral linear program with linear complementarity constraints (LPCC). Instead\nof solving the LPCC with a full set of integer variables expressing the\ncomplementarity conditions, the presented method solves a finite number of\nmixed integer subprograms by starting with a small fraction of integer\nvariables and progressively increasing this fraction. After describing the PIP\n(for progressive integer programming) method and its various implementations,\nwe demonstrate, via an extensive set of computational experiments, the superior\nperformance of the progressive approach over the direct solution of the\nfull-integer formulation of the LPCCs. It is also shown that the solution\nobtained at the termination of the PIP method is a local minimizer of the LPCC,\na property that cannot be claimed by any known non-enumerative method for\nsolving this nonconvex program. In all the experiments, the PIP method is\ninitiated at a feasible solution of the LPCC obtained from a nonlinear\nprogramming solver, and with high likelihood, can successfully improve it.\nThus, the PIP method can improve a stationary solution of an indefinite QP,\nsomething that is not likely to be achievable by a nonlinear programming\nmethod. Finally, some analysis is presented that provides a better\nunderstanding of the roles of the LPCC suboptimal solutions in the local\noptimality of the indefinite QP.","PeriodicalId":501286,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Optimization and Control","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Optimization and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indefinite quadratic programs (QPs) are known to be very difficult to be solved to global optimality, so are linear programs with linear complementarity constraints. Treating the former as a subclass of the latter, this paper presents a progressive mixed integer linear programming method for solving a general linear program with linear complementarity constraints (LPCC). Instead of solving the LPCC with a full set of integer variables expressing the complementarity conditions, the presented method solves a finite number of mixed integer subprograms by starting with a small fraction of integer variables and progressively increasing this fraction. After describing the PIP (for progressive integer programming) method and its various implementations, we demonstrate, via an extensive set of computational experiments, the superior performance of the progressive approach over the direct solution of the full-integer formulation of the LPCCs. It is also shown that the solution obtained at the termination of the PIP method is a local minimizer of the LPCC, a property that cannot be claimed by any known non-enumerative method for solving this nonconvex program. In all the experiments, the PIP method is initiated at a feasible solution of the LPCC obtained from a nonlinear programming solver, and with high likelihood, can successfully improve it. Thus, the PIP method can improve a stationary solution of an indefinite QP, something that is not likely to be achievable by a nonlinear programming method. Finally, some analysis is presented that provides a better understanding of the roles of the LPCC suboptimal solutions in the local optimality of the indefinite QP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用渐进式 MIP 方法改进带互补约束的不定二次程序和线性程序的求解方法
众所周知,无限二次型程序(QPs)很难求解到全局最优,具有线性互补约束的线性程序也是如此。本文将前者视为后者的一个子类,提出了一种渐进式混合整数线性规划方法,用于求解具有线性互补约束的一般线性规划(LPCC)。本文提出的方法不是用一整套表示互补条件的整数变量来求解 LPCC,而是从一小部分整数变量开始,逐步增加这部分变量,从而求解有限数量的混合整数子程序。在介绍了 PIP(渐进整数编程)方法及其各种实现方法后,我们通过大量的计算实验证明,渐进方法比直接求解 LPCC 的全整数公式性能更优越。实验还表明,在 PIP 方法结束时得到的解是 LPCC 的局部最小值,这是任何已知的非数值方法都无法解决的非凸程序。在所有实验中,PIP 方法都是在非线性编程求解器获得的 LPCC 可行解上启动的,并且很有可能成功改进 LPCC。因此,PIP 方法可以改进不定 QP 的静态解,而这是非线性编程方法不可能实现的。最后,本文通过分析,更好地理解了 LPCC 次优解在不定 QP 局部最优中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trading with propagators and constraints: applications to optimal execution and battery storage Upgrading edges in the maximal covering location problem Minmax regret maximal covering location problems with edge demands Parametric Shape Optimization of Flagellated Micro-Swimmers Using Bayesian Techniques Rapid and finite-time boundary stabilization of a KdV system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1