A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity

IF 0.5 Q4 ECONOMICS PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1177/10911421241280456
Timothy R. Hodge, Timothy M. Komarek, Andrew McAllister
{"title":"A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity","authors":"Timothy R. Hodge, Timothy M. Komarek, Andrew McAllister","doi":"10.1177/10911421241280456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We estimate the degree to which tax inequity generated through property tax assessment practices are capitalized into residential property values. Our analysis not only evaluates whether property buyers understand the tax obligations they are likely to face at the purchase of their property, we also document varying effects based on assessment status. Overassessed, lower-valued property sell for a discount and underassessed, higher-valued property sell for a premium. Specifically, overassessed property sells for an undercapitalized discount of 13%, while underassessed property sells for overcapitalized premiums equal more than 10%. Together, our results imply assessment practices impact wealth both during and after property ownership, potentially widening the wealth gap between high- and low-income homeowners.","PeriodicalId":46919,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421241280456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimate the degree to which tax inequity generated through property tax assessment practices are capitalized into residential property values. Our analysis not only evaluates whether property buyers understand the tax obligations they are likely to face at the purchase of their property, we also document varying effects based on assessment status. Overassessed, lower-valued property sell for a discount and underassessed, higher-valued property sell for a premium. Specifically, overassessed property sells for an undercapitalized discount of 13%, while underassessed property sells for overcapitalized premiums equal more than 10%. Together, our results imply assessment practices impact wealth both during and after property ownership, potentially widening the wealth gap between high- and low-income homeowners.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重否定:利用评估倒退
我们估算了房产税评估实践中产生的税收不公平在多大程度上被资本化到了住宅房产价值中。我们的分析不仅评估了房产买家是否了解他们在购买房产时可能面临的纳税义务,还记录了根据评估状况产生的不同影响。评估过高、价值较低的房产以折扣价出售,而评估过低、价值较高的房产则以溢价出售。具体来说,评估过高的房产以 13% 的折扣出售,而评估过低的房产则以超过 10% 的溢价出售。总之,我们的研究结果表明,评估方法在房产所有权期间和之后都会对财富产生影响,可能会扩大高收入和低收入房主之间的贫富差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Public Finance Review is a professional forum devoted to US policy-oriented economic research and theory, which focuses on a variety of allocation, distribution and stabilization functions within the public-sector economy. Economists, policy makers, political scientists, and researchers all rely on Public Finance Review, to bring them the most up-to-date information on the ever changing US public finance system, and to help them put policies and research into action. Public Finance Review not only presents rigorous empirical and theoretical papers on public economic policies, but also examines and critiques their impact and consequences. The journal analyzes the nature and function of evolving US governmental fiscal policies at the national, state and local levels.
期刊最新文献
A Double Negative: Capitalizing on Assessment Regressivity Fiscal Incidence of the Property Tax Does Smaller Government Mean Less Corruption? Can the Federal Budget Process Promote Fiscal Sustainability? Evidence from the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 Optimal Social Security with Loss Aversion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1