Lateral meniscus root tear in anterior cruciate ligament injured patients is not associated with increased rotatory knee laxity: A quantitative pivot shift analysis

Gian Andrea Lucidi , Bálint Zsidai , Joseph D. Giusto , Ryosuke Kuroda , James J. Irrgang , Kristian Samuelsson , Stefano Zaffagnini , Volker Musahl
{"title":"Lateral meniscus root tear in anterior cruciate ligament injured patients is not associated with increased rotatory knee laxity: A quantitative pivot shift analysis","authors":"Gian Andrea Lucidi ,&nbsp;Bálint Zsidai ,&nbsp;Joseph D. Giusto ,&nbsp;Ryosuke Kuroda ,&nbsp;James J. Irrgang ,&nbsp;Kristian Samuelsson ,&nbsp;Stefano Zaffagnini ,&nbsp;Volker Musahl","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Biomechanical investigations conducted in vitro have elucidated the detrimental impact of lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) tears on knee contact pressures in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee. Nevertheless, the influence of LMPR tears on the kinematics of ACL-injured patients remains ambiguous. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of LMPR tears on anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity employing a clinically validated quantitative pivot shift (QPS) analysis system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with ACL injury recruited in a prospective ACL registry spanning from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively screened for eligibility. Criteria for inclusion encompassed complete primary ACL tears, absence of concurrent ligamentous or osseous injuries requiring operative treatment, and no prior knee surgeries.</div><div>Patients were assigned to two cohorts based on the presence (LMPR+) or absence (LMPR-) of an LMPR tear concomitant with ACL injury. Each patient underwent a standardized PS test, measurement of anterior tibial translation (ATT) (mm) using the Rolimeter, and QPS (mm) with a tablet-based image analysis system (PIVOT App). Comparative analyses of categorical variables were performed using the Fisher exact and Chi-square tests, while non-normally distributed continuous variables were compared between groups with the Mann–Whitney U test. Alfa was set at 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 99 patients were included in the study, of which 22 were assigned to the LMPR+ and 77 to the LMPR- group. Tear depth was considered partial in 13 (59%) patients and full in 9 (41%) patients. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears was greater in the LMPR+ (n ​= ​16, 73%) compared with the LMPR- (n ​= ​33, 43%) group (p ​= ​0.01). No difference was observed in ATT measured with the Rolimeter (p ​= ​0.63). Similarly, no difference was found in QPS between the LMPR+ (2.3 ​mm) and the LMPR- (1.9 ​mm) group (p ​= ​0.08).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Utilizing QPS in this investigation, LMPR tears do not significantly increase ATT or rotatory knee laxity. Consequently, although repairing LMRT associated with ACL injuries may be advisable for minimizing joint stress, their impact on controlling the PS in patients remains uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>III, retrospective comparative study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059775424001664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Biomechanical investigations conducted in vitro have elucidated the detrimental impact of lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) tears on knee contact pressures in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee. Nevertheless, the influence of LMPR tears on the kinematics of ACL-injured patients remains ambiguous. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of LMPR tears on anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity employing a clinically validated quantitative pivot shift (QPS) analysis system.

Methods

Patients with ACL injury recruited in a prospective ACL registry spanning from 2012 to 2020 were retrospectively screened for eligibility. Criteria for inclusion encompassed complete primary ACL tears, absence of concurrent ligamentous or osseous injuries requiring operative treatment, and no prior knee surgeries.
Patients were assigned to two cohorts based on the presence (LMPR+) or absence (LMPR-) of an LMPR tear concomitant with ACL injury. Each patient underwent a standardized PS test, measurement of anterior tibial translation (ATT) (mm) using the Rolimeter, and QPS (mm) with a tablet-based image analysis system (PIVOT App). Comparative analyses of categorical variables were performed using the Fisher exact and Chi-square tests, while non-normally distributed continuous variables were compared between groups with the Mann–Whitney U test. Alfa was set at 0.05.

Results

A total of 99 patients were included in the study, of which 22 were assigned to the LMPR+ and 77 to the LMPR- group. Tear depth was considered partial in 13 (59%) patients and full in 9 (41%) patients. The prevalence of medial meniscus tears was greater in the LMPR+ (n ​= ​16, 73%) compared with the LMPR- (n ​= ​33, 43%) group (p ​= ​0.01). No difference was observed in ATT measured with the Rolimeter (p ​= ​0.63). Similarly, no difference was found in QPS between the LMPR+ (2.3 ​mm) and the LMPR- (1.9 ​mm) group (p ​= ​0.08).

Conclusion

Utilizing QPS in this investigation, LMPR tears do not significantly increase ATT or rotatory knee laxity. Consequently, although repairing LMRT associated with ACL injuries may be advisable for minimizing joint stress, their impact on controlling the PS in patients remains uncertain.

Level of evidence

III, retrospective comparative study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带损伤患者的外侧半月板根撕裂与膝关节旋转松弛度增加无关:枢轴移位定量分析》。
目的:体外进行的生物力学研究阐明了外侧半月板后根(LMPR)撕裂对前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤膝关节接触压力的不利影响。然而,LMPR撕裂对前交叉韧带损伤患者运动学的影响仍不明确。本研究的目的是采用经临床验证的定量枢轴移位(QPS)分析系统,评估 LMPR 撕裂对膝关节前后和旋转松弛的影响。纳入标准包括完全的原发性前交叉韧带撕裂、没有需要手术治疗的并发韧带或骨质损伤,以及之前未接受过膝关节手术。根据前交叉韧带损伤同时伴有(LMPR+)或不伴有(LMPR-)LMPR撕裂,将患者分为两组。每位患者都接受了标准化的枢轴移位(PS)测试,使用Rolimeter测量了胫骨前移(毫米),并使用平板电脑图像分析系统(PIVOT App)测量了QPS(毫米)。分类变量的比较分析采用费舍尔精确检验和卡方检验,非正态分布连续变量的组间比较采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验。结果共有 99 名患者参与研究,其中 22 人被分配到 LMPR+ 组,77 人被分配到 LMPR- 组。13例(59%)患者的撕裂深度被认为是部分撕裂,9例(41%)患者的撕裂深度被认为是完全撕裂。LMPR+组(16人,73%)与LMPR-组(33人,43%)相比,内侧半月板撕裂的发生率更高(P=0.01)。用滚轮计测量的胫骨前移没有发现差异(P=0.63)。同样,LMPR+ 组(2.3 毫米)和 LMPR- 组(1.9 毫米)的 QPS 也未发现差异(P=0.08)。因此,尽管修复与前交叉韧带损伤相关的 LMRT 可使关节应力最小化,但其对控制患者枢轴移位的影响仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Surgical Intervention in Femoroacetabular Impingement Amongst the Asian Population: A Meta-analysis. Ligamentous Ankle Injuries in Relation to the Morphology of the Incisura Fibularis: A Systematic Review. Acute compartment syndrome of the leg following peroneus longus tendon graft harvesting: case report. MCL pie crusting for concomitant medial meniscal surgery does not appear to adversely influence primary ACL reconstruction functional outcomes. Oblique or short incisions reduce the risk of saphenous nerve damage during hamstrings harvesting. A model for mapping nerve pathways at the harvest site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1