Acquaintance ratings of honesty-humility and their relationship with extra-role behaviors

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112876
Erik Dietl, Olga Kombeiz
{"title":"Acquaintance ratings of honesty-humility and their relationship with extra-role behaviors","authors":"Erik Dietl,&nbsp;Olga Kombeiz","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2024.112876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Observers' ratings of personality better predict work outcomes than self-ratings (Oh, Wang, &amp; Mount, 2011). Emerging studies suggested that observers have greater accuracy than target persons themselves (“clearer lens”) by showing that acquaintance ratings of personality had predictive advantages beyond self-ratings. Here, we extend prior research by investigating the role of acquaintance-rated honesty-humility for predicting extra-role behaviors. We hypothesized that acquaintance-rated honesty-humility would incrementally predict counterproductive work behavior (CWB) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) beyond self-ratings. In a multi-source field study with data from employees, acquaintances, and coworkers, we found that acquaintance-rated honesty-humility predicted OCB incrementally beyond self-ratings, but not CWB. Furthermore, acquaintance-rated honesty-humility was the most important predictor for OCB when compared to conscientiousness and agreeableness. Moreover, we found equal validity of self- and acquaintance-rated personality in relation to co-worker rated personality. We discuss implications for personality theory, measurement, and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 112876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003362/pdfft?md5=4052405804737602ae77e2ab1835b90c&pid=1-s2.0-S0191886924003362-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886924003362","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observers' ratings of personality better predict work outcomes than self-ratings (Oh, Wang, & Mount, 2011). Emerging studies suggested that observers have greater accuracy than target persons themselves (“clearer lens”) by showing that acquaintance ratings of personality had predictive advantages beyond self-ratings. Here, we extend prior research by investigating the role of acquaintance-rated honesty-humility for predicting extra-role behaviors. We hypothesized that acquaintance-rated honesty-humility would incrementally predict counterproductive work behavior (CWB) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) beyond self-ratings. In a multi-source field study with data from employees, acquaintances, and coworkers, we found that acquaintance-rated honesty-humility predicted OCB incrementally beyond self-ratings, but not CWB. Furthermore, acquaintance-rated honesty-humility was the most important predictor for OCB when compared to conscientiousness and agreeableness. Moreover, we found equal validity of self- and acquaintance-rated personality in relation to co-worker rated personality. We discuss implications for personality theory, measurement, and practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熟人对诚实-谦逊的评价及其与角色外行为的关系
观察者对人格的评价比自我评价更能预测工作结果(Oh, Wang, & Mount, 2011)。新近的研究表明,观察者比目标人物本身具有更高的准确性("更清晰的透镜"),这是因为熟人对人格的评价具有超越自我评价的预测优势。在此,我们扩展了之前的研究,调查了熟人评价的诚实-谦逊在预测角色外行为方面的作用。我们假设,熟人评定的诚实-谦逊将超越自我评定,逐步预测消极工作行为(CWB)和组织公民行为(OCB)。在一项由员工、熟人和同事提供数据的多来源实地研究中,我们发现熟人评定的诚实-谦逊能逐步预测超出自我评定的 OCB,但不能预测 CWB。此外,与自觉性和合意性相比,熟人评定的诚实-谦逊是预测 OCB 的最重要因素。此外,我们还发现自评和熟人评定的人格与同事评定的人格具有同等效力。我们讨论了对人格理论、测量和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
期刊最新文献
Personality traits and their role in intimate partner violence recidivism: A 15-year follow-up study within a prison sample Navigating the pitfalls of incivility: The role of resilience in job search behavior Subjectivity in creative self beliefs: A Q-sort analysis Developing a novel parental phubbing scale of mother and father forms for adolescents in Türkiye: A validity and reliability study Clusters of borderline personality disorder traits and functional life outcomes: A novel person-centered approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1