Efe Eworuke, Mayura U. Shinde, Laura Hou, J. Michael Paterson, Peter Bjødstrup Jensen, Judith C. Maro, Ashish Rai, Anton Pottegård, Daniel Scarnecchia, Yuanling Liang, Deborah Johnson, Robert W. Platt, Hana Lee, Marie C. Bradley
{"title":"Exposure to Valsartan Products Containing Nitrosamine Impurities in the United States, Canada, and Denmark","authors":"Efe Eworuke, Mayura U. Shinde, Laura Hou, J. Michael Paterson, Peter Bjødstrup Jensen, Judith C. Maro, Ashish Rai, Anton Pottegård, Daniel Scarnecchia, Yuanling Liang, Deborah Johnson, Robert W. Platt, Hana Lee, Marie C. Bradley","doi":"10.1002/pds.5849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundFollowing the mass recall of valsartan products with nitrosamine impurities in July 2018, the number of patients exposed to these products, the duration of exposure, and the potential for cancer remains unknown. Therefore, we assessed the extent and duration of use of valsartan products with a nitrosamine impurity in the United States, Canada, and Denmark.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative healthcare data from the US FDA Sentinel System, four Canadian provinces that contribute to the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients, 18 years and older between May 2012 and December 2020 with a valsartan dispensing were identified in each database. Patients were followed from the date of valsartan dispensing until discontinuation. We defined four valsartan exposure categories based on nitrosamine impurity status; recalled generic products with confirmed NDMA/NDEA levels (recalled‐tested); recalled generic products that were not tested (recalled); non‐recalled generic and non‐recalled branded products. In Denmark, the recalled‐tested category was not included due to absence of testing data. The proportion and duration of use of valsartan episodes stratified by nitrosamine‐impurity status was calculated.ResultsWe identified 3.3 and 2.8 million (United States) and 51.3 and 229 thousand (Canada) recalled‐tested and recalled valsartan exposures. In Denmark, where valsartan exposure was generally low, there were 10 747 recalled exposures. Immediately after the recall notices were issued, there was increased rates of switching to a non‐valsartan ARB. The mean duration of use of the recalled‐tested products was 167 (±223.1) and 146 (±255.8) days in the United States and Canada respectively. For the recalled products, mean cumulative duration of use was 178 (±249.6), 269 (±397.3) and 166 (±251.0) days in the United States, Canada, and Denmark, respectively.ConclusionIn this cohort study, despite widespread use of recalled generic valsartan between 2012 and 2018, the duration of use was relatively short and probably did not pose an elevated risk of nitrosamine‐induced cancer. However, since products with nitrosamine impurity could have been on the market over a 6‐year period, patients exposed to these products for longer durations could have a potentially different risk of cancer.","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"502 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundFollowing the mass recall of valsartan products with nitrosamine impurities in July 2018, the number of patients exposed to these products, the duration of exposure, and the potential for cancer remains unknown. Therefore, we assessed the extent and duration of use of valsartan products with a nitrosamine impurity in the United States, Canada, and Denmark.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative healthcare data from the US FDA Sentinel System, four Canadian provinces that contribute to the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), and the Danish National Prescription Registry. Patients, 18 years and older between May 2012 and December 2020 with a valsartan dispensing were identified in each database. Patients were followed from the date of valsartan dispensing until discontinuation. We defined four valsartan exposure categories based on nitrosamine impurity status; recalled generic products with confirmed NDMA/NDEA levels (recalled‐tested); recalled generic products that were not tested (recalled); non‐recalled generic and non‐recalled branded products. In Denmark, the recalled‐tested category was not included due to absence of testing data. The proportion and duration of use of valsartan episodes stratified by nitrosamine‐impurity status was calculated.ResultsWe identified 3.3 and 2.8 million (United States) and 51.3 and 229 thousand (Canada) recalled‐tested and recalled valsartan exposures. In Denmark, where valsartan exposure was generally low, there were 10 747 recalled exposures. Immediately after the recall notices were issued, there was increased rates of switching to a non‐valsartan ARB. The mean duration of use of the recalled‐tested products was 167 (±223.1) and 146 (±255.8) days in the United States and Canada respectively. For the recalled products, mean cumulative duration of use was 178 (±249.6), 269 (±397.3) and 166 (±251.0) days in the United States, Canada, and Denmark, respectively.ConclusionIn this cohort study, despite widespread use of recalled generic valsartan between 2012 and 2018, the duration of use was relatively short and probably did not pose an elevated risk of nitrosamine‐induced cancer. However, since products with nitrosamine impurity could have been on the market over a 6‐year period, patients exposed to these products for longer durations could have a potentially different risk of cancer.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.