Impact of Pharmacovigilance Interventions Targeting Fluoroquinolones on Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/pds.70081
Tomas Lasys, Yared Santa-Ana-Tellez, Satu J Siiskonen, Rolf H H Groenwold, Helga Gardarsdottir
{"title":"Impact of Pharmacovigilance Interventions Targeting Fluoroquinolones on Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.","authors":"Tomas Lasys, Yared Santa-Ana-Tellez, Satu J Siiskonen, Rolf H H Groenwold, Helga Gardarsdottir","doi":"10.1002/pds.70081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Fluoroquinolones are antibiotics associated with adverse events that prompted the European Medicines Agency to implement risk minimization measures (RMMs) in 2018/19 and 2020. Our aim is to assess the RMMs' impact on antibiotic prescriptions in primary care during 2014-2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed antibiotic prescriptions using CPRD GOLD (the United Kingdom, UK) and PHARMO (the Netherlands, NL). Prescriptions were assessed for fluoroquinolones and alternative antibiotics. The impact of RMMs on prescribing was assessed with interrupted time series (ITS) using monthly prescription rates per 10 000 person-years (MPTPY).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2014 and 2023, we identified cohorts of 4.0 (UK) and 0.9 million (NL) antibiotic users. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed to initiate 1.5% (UK) to 5.8% (NL) of the treatment episodes. Fluoroquinolone prescribing before the RMMs slowly decreased in the UK and was stable in the NL. The 2018/19 RMMs were associated with a steady downward post-RMMs trend in incident use of fluoroquinolones (MPTPY -0.7 [UK] and -0.8 [NL]) and opposite changes after 2020 RMMs (MPTPY 0.6 [UK] and 1.8 [NL]). The 2018/2019 RMMs were linked with increasing trends for other antibacterials (J01XX) in both countries and other beta-lactam antibacterials in the UK, but most antibiotics had decreasing trends post-RMMs in both countries. After the 2020 RMMs, some antibiotic groups showed upward trends.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk minimization measures in 2018/2019 were associated with a moderate decrease in fluoroquinolone prescribing, with no further decrease after 2020 RMMs. There was no sustained increase in other antibiotic prescribing, suggesting that overprescribing was negligible as an unintended impact of RMMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 2","pages":"e70081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11739677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Fluoroquinolones are antibiotics associated with adverse events that prompted the European Medicines Agency to implement risk minimization measures (RMMs) in 2018/19 and 2020. Our aim is to assess the RMMs' impact on antibiotic prescriptions in primary care during 2014-2023.

Methods: We assessed antibiotic prescriptions using CPRD GOLD (the United Kingdom, UK) and PHARMO (the Netherlands, NL). Prescriptions were assessed for fluoroquinolones and alternative antibiotics. The impact of RMMs on prescribing was assessed with interrupted time series (ITS) using monthly prescription rates per 10 000 person-years (MPTPY).

Results: Between 2014 and 2023, we identified cohorts of 4.0 (UK) and 0.9 million (NL) antibiotic users. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed to initiate 1.5% (UK) to 5.8% (NL) of the treatment episodes. Fluoroquinolone prescribing before the RMMs slowly decreased in the UK and was stable in the NL. The 2018/19 RMMs were associated with a steady downward post-RMMs trend in incident use of fluoroquinolones (MPTPY -0.7 [UK] and -0.8 [NL]) and opposite changes after 2020 RMMs (MPTPY 0.6 [UK] and 1.8 [NL]). The 2018/2019 RMMs were linked with increasing trends for other antibacterials (J01XX) in both countries and other beta-lactam antibacterials in the UK, but most antibiotics had decreasing trends post-RMMs in both countries. After the 2020 RMMs, some antibiotic groups showed upward trends.

Conclusion: The risk minimization measures in 2018/2019 were associated with a moderate decrease in fluoroquinolone prescribing, with no further decrease after 2020 RMMs. There was no sustained increase in other antibiotic prescribing, suggesting that overprescribing was negligible as an unintended impact of RMMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对氟喹诺酮类药物的药物警戒干预措施对荷兰和英国抗生素使用的影响。
目的:氟喹诺酮类抗生素与不良事件相关,促使欧洲药品管理局在2018/19和2020年实施风险最小化措施(RMMs)。我们的目的是评估2014-2023年RMMs对初级保健抗生素处方的影响。方法:我们使用CPRD GOLD(英国)和PHARMO(荷兰,NL)对抗生素处方进行评估。评估氟喹诺酮类药物和替代抗生素的处方。RMMs对处方的影响采用中断时间序列(ITS)评估,使用每10000人年的月处方率(MPTPY)。结果:在2014年至2023年期间,我们确定了4.0 (UK)和90万(NL)抗生素使用者的队列。氟喹诺酮类药物用于1.5% (UK)至5.8% (NL)的治疗发作。在RMMs之前,氟喹诺酮处方在英国缓慢下降,在NL稳定。2018/19年RMMs与氟喹诺酮类药物事件使用的RMMs后稳定下降趋势(MPTPY为-0.7 [UK]和-0.8 [NL])以及2020年RMMs后相反的变化(MPTPY为0.6 [UK]和1.8 [NL])相关。2018/2019年度RMMs与两国其他抗生素(J01XX)和英国其他β -内酰胺类抗生素的增加趋势有关,但两国大多数抗生素在RMMs后呈下降趋势。在2020年RMMs之后,一些抗生素组呈上升趋势。结论:2018/2019年风险最小化措施与氟喹诺酮类药物处方适度减少相关,2020年RMMs后无进一步减少。其他抗生素处方没有持续增加,这表明作为RMMs的意外影响,过度处方可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
173
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report. Particular areas of interest include: design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology; comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world; methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology; assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy; patterns of drug utilization; relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines; evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Lookback Duration on the Performance of a Claims-Based Frailty Proxy in Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer. Impact of Pharmacovigilance Interventions Targeting Fluoroquinolones on Antibiotic Use in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Successful Linkage of Electronic Medical Records and National Health Data System in Type 2 Diabetes Research: Methodological Insights and Implications. Use of Potentially Nephrotoxic Drugs in Type 2 Diabetes Patients on SGLT2i: A Trajectories Analysis. Lessons Learned From Characterizing Long COVID Among US Medicare Beneficiaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1