Does the coronal deformity angular ratio affect bracing outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08486-1
Lærke C. Ragborg, David Thornberg, Megan Johnson, Amy McIntosh, Daniel Sucato, Martin Gehrchen, Benny Dahl, Søren Ohrt-Nissen
{"title":"Does the coronal deformity angular ratio affect bracing outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?","authors":"Lærke C. Ragborg, David Thornberg, Megan Johnson, Amy McIntosh, Daniel Sucato, Martin Gehrchen, Benny Dahl, Søren Ohrt-Nissen","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08486-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To examine if coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) serves as a predictor for progression to surgical magnitude in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) treated with thoracolumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients with AIS, prescribed a full-time TLSO, Cobb angle 20–40°, Risser 0–2, who wore the brace ≥ 12.9 h and reached skeletal maturity/surgery were included retrospectively. C-DAR was defined as the Cobb angle divided by the number of vertebrae in the curve, yielding a larger value in short curves. The association between C-DAR and the risk of progression to surgical magnitude (&gt; 45°) was assessed. Secondly, we evaluated the association between pre-treatment Cobb angle and in-brace correction on the risk of progression to &gt; 45°.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We included 165 patients with a mean Cobb angle of 30 ± 6°. Of these, 46/165 (28%) progressed ≥ 6° and 26/165 (16%) reached surgical magnitude at the end of treatment. C-DAR was a significant predictor for risk of progression to surgical magnitude with an OR of 1.9 (CI 1.2–2.9) per unit increase in C-DAR. A threshold value of 5.15 was established and demonstrated an OR 5.9 (CI 2.1–17.9) for curve progression to a surgical magnitude. Likewise, pre-treatment Cobb angle showed a significant OR 1.3(CI 1.2–1.4) per degree increase in Cobb, whereas in-brace % correction showed OR 0.96 (CI 0.93–0.98).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>C-DAR is an independent predictor for progression to a surgical magnitude in AIS patients treated with bracing. Patients with a higher C-DAR should be counseled to help set realistic expectations regarding the likelihood of curve progression despite compliance with brace wear.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08486-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To examine if coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) serves as a predictor for progression to surgical magnitude in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) treated with thoracolumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO).

Methods

Patients with AIS, prescribed a full-time TLSO, Cobb angle 20–40°, Risser 0–2, who wore the brace ≥ 12.9 h and reached skeletal maturity/surgery were included retrospectively. C-DAR was defined as the Cobb angle divided by the number of vertebrae in the curve, yielding a larger value in short curves. The association between C-DAR and the risk of progression to surgical magnitude (> 45°) was assessed. Secondly, we evaluated the association between pre-treatment Cobb angle and in-brace correction on the risk of progression to > 45°.

Results

We included 165 patients with a mean Cobb angle of 30 ± 6°. Of these, 46/165 (28%) progressed ≥ 6° and 26/165 (16%) reached surgical magnitude at the end of treatment. C-DAR was a significant predictor for risk of progression to surgical magnitude with an OR of 1.9 (CI 1.2–2.9) per unit increase in C-DAR. A threshold value of 5.15 was established and demonstrated an OR 5.9 (CI 2.1–17.9) for curve progression to a surgical magnitude. Likewise, pre-treatment Cobb angle showed a significant OR 1.3(CI 1.2–1.4) per degree increase in Cobb, whereas in-brace % correction showed OR 0.96 (CI 0.93–0.98).

Conclusion

C-DAR is an independent predictor for progression to a surgical magnitude in AIS patients treated with bracing. Patients with a higher C-DAR should be counseled to help set realistic expectations regarding the likelihood of curve progression despite compliance with brace wear.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状畸形角度比会影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的矫正效果吗?
目的 研究冠状畸形角度比(C-DAR)是否可预测接受胸腰椎骶骨矫形器(TLSO)治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧弯症(AIS)患者的病情发展到手术程度。C-DAR 的定义是 Cobb 角除以曲线中的椎骨数,短曲线中的数值较大。我们评估了 C-DAR 与发展到手术幅度(45°)的风险之间的关系。其次,我们还评估了治疗前 Cobb 角和矫形器内矫正与发展到 45° 的风险之间的关系。结果 我们共纳入了 165 名平均 Cobb 角为 30 ± 6° 的患者。其中,46/165(28%)人的病情进展≥6°,26/165(16%)人在治疗结束时达到手术量级。C-DAR是预测进展到手术幅值风险的重要指标,C-DAR每增加一个单位的OR为1.9 (CI 1.2-2.9)。阈值为 5.15 时,曲线发展到手术程度的 OR 为 5.9(CI 为 2.1-17.9)。同样,治疗前的 Cobb 角每增加 1 度,OR 值为 1.3(CI 为 1.2-1.4),而支架内矫正百分比的 OR 值为 0.96(CI 为 0.93-0.98)。对于 C-DAR 较高的患者,应向其提供咨询,帮助其设定切合实际的预期,即尽管遵医嘱佩戴支具,曲线仍有可能恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Impact of landmark crater creation on improving accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in robot-assisted scoliosis surgery. MRI-based endplate bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy fusion. Letter to the editor Regarding 'Causal relationship between basal metabolic rate and intervertebral disc degeneration: a Mendelian randomization study' by Liu Z, et al. (Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun 24. Doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08367-7). Announcements. Answer to the letter to the editor of Z. Feng, et al. concerning "Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparison of postoperative outcomes" by Levy HA, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08412-5).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1