The problem of salvation: a clue from Robert Oppenheimer

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Theology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1177/0040571x241276635
David G. Kibble
{"title":"The problem of salvation: a clue from Robert Oppenheimer","authors":"David G. Kibble","doi":"10.1177/0040571x241276635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article begins by looking at whether God will save all (universalism) or whether he requires a response on the part of man to effect that salvation. Tom Torrance’s writing seems to suggest that both may be true. It is suggested that this paradox can be resolved, however, if, accepting the thesis in the scientific sphere by Robert Oppenheimer and in the theological sphere by John Macquarrie, we argue that both can be accepted as true and as complementary descriptions of salvation.","PeriodicalId":53994,"journal":{"name":"Theology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571x241276635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article begins by looking at whether God will save all (universalism) or whether he requires a response on the part of man to effect that salvation. Tom Torrance’s writing seems to suggest that both may be true. It is suggested that this paradox can be resolved, however, if, accepting the thesis in the scientific sphere by Robert Oppenheimer and in the theological sphere by John Macquarrie, we argue that both can be accepted as true and as complementary descriptions of salvation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
救赎问题:罗伯特-奥本海默提供的线索
文章首先探讨了上帝是会拯救所有人(普世主义),还是需要人类做出回应才能实现拯救。汤姆-托伦斯的著作似乎认为两者都是对的。文章认为,如果我们接受罗伯特-奥本海默(Robert Oppenheimer)在科学领域和约翰-麦考利(John Macquarrie)在神学领域提出的论点,认为两者都是真实的,都是对救赎的互补描述,那么这个悖论就可以得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theology
Theology RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
期刊最新文献
Kate Bruce and Liz Shercliff, Out of the Shadows: Preaching the Women of the Bible. Volume 2 Joan Lockwood O’Donovan, English Public Theology: A Reformation Response to the Crisis of Natural Rights Anne van Gend, Restoring the Story: The Good News of Atonement Jessica Martin, The Eucharist in Four Dimensions: The Meanings of Communion in Contemporary Culture Mark W. Hamilton and Samjung Kang-Hamilton, Story, Ritual, Prophecy, Wisdom: Reading and Teaching the Bible Today
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1