Energising the Energy Literacy Debate for Environmental Education: Exploring Citizens’ Interest Levels, Knowledge Gaps and Individual Differences

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australian Journal of Environmental Education Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1017/aee.2024.37
Irina Rets, Denise Whitelock, Chris Edwards, Leigh-Anne Perryman, Fereshte Goshtasbpour
{"title":"Energising the Energy Literacy Debate for Environmental Education: Exploring Citizens’ Interest Levels, Knowledge Gaps and Individual Differences","authors":"Irina Rets, Denise Whitelock, Chris Edwards, Leigh-Anne Perryman, Fereshte Goshtasbpour","doi":"10.1017/aee.2024.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Energy literacy can empower individuals to make informed decisions about energy use. However, the level of public interest in learning about energy-related topics remains uncertain, and there is a dearth of research exploring energy literacy-related knowledge gaps. This mixed-methods study aimed to address those issues. A survey of 3,843 citizens from four European countries revealed that most citizens have only a moderate interest in learning about energy. Age, gender, educational level, income level, living situation and environmental attitudes appear to have a significant effect on individuals’ interests. The study identified key knowledge demand areas regarding saving energy and reducing costs, becoming self-sufficient in energy production and cooperating with others for more efficient energy use. The findings indicate that engagement with energy-related topics could be improved by considering affective factors such as individual interest. The study also reveals a need for greater interdisciplinarity in energy research.</p>","PeriodicalId":44842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2024.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy literacy can empower individuals to make informed decisions about energy use. However, the level of public interest in learning about energy-related topics remains uncertain, and there is a dearth of research exploring energy literacy-related knowledge gaps. This mixed-methods study aimed to address those issues. A survey of 3,843 citizens from four European countries revealed that most citizens have only a moderate interest in learning about energy. Age, gender, educational level, income level, living situation and environmental attitudes appear to have a significant effect on individuals’ interests. The study identified key knowledge demand areas regarding saving energy and reducing costs, becoming self-sufficient in energy production and cooperating with others for more efficient energy use. The findings indicate that engagement with energy-related topics could be improved by considering affective factors such as individual interest. The study also reveals a need for greater interdisciplinarity in energy research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为环境教育的能源扫盲辩论注入活力:探索公民的兴趣水平、知识差距和个体差异
能源扫盲可以增强个人对能源使用做出明智决定的能力。然而,公众对了解能源相关主题的兴趣程度仍不确定,而且探索能源扫盲相关知识差距的研究也十分匮乏。这项混合方法研究旨在解决这些问题。对来自四个欧洲国家的 3843 名公民进行的调查显示,大多数公民对能源知识的学习兴趣一般。年龄、性别、教育水平、收入水平、生活状况和环境态度似乎对个人的兴趣有很大影响。研究确定了关键的知识需求领域,涉及节约能源和降低成本、实现能源生产的自给自足以及与他人合作提高能源利用效率。研究结果表明,可以通过考虑个人兴趣等情感因素来提高对能源相关主题的参与度。这项研究还揭示了在能源研究中加强跨学科性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Australian Journal of Environmental Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: An internationally refereed journal which publishes papers and reports on all aspects of environmental education. It presents information and argument which stimulates debate about educational strategies that enhance the kinds of awareness, understanding and actions which will promote environmental and social justice.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising Australian Gold Rush Narratives with Critical Geopolitics “It’s the Only World We’ve Got.” Children’s Responses to Chris Jordan’s Images about SDG 14: Life Below Water Towards an Indigenous-Informed Multispecies Collaboratory Energising the Energy Literacy Debate for Environmental Education: Exploring Citizens’ Interest Levels, Knowledge Gaps and Individual Differences Caring Enough to Counter Extinction: The Work of Volunteer Bat Carers and Educators in Tropical Queensland, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1