Circulating Biomarkers as Predictors of Improvement in Physical Function in Hospitalized Older Adults with Geriatric Syndromes: Findings from the REHAB-HF Trial

Abdulla Damluji, Scott A Bruce, Gordon Reeves, Amy M. Pastva, Alain G Bertoni, Robert J Mentz, David Whellan, Dalane Kitzman, Christopher R deFilippi
{"title":"Circulating Biomarkers as Predictors of Improvement in Physical Function in Hospitalized Older Adults with Geriatric Syndromes: Findings from the REHAB-HF Trial","authors":"Abdulla Damluji, Scott A Bruce, Gordon Reeves, Amy M. Pastva, Alain G Bertoni, Robert J Mentz, David Whellan, Dalane Kitzman, Christopher R deFilippi","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Circulating biomarkers play an important role in patients with heart failure (HF) for risk stratification and mechanistic insights. We aimed to examine if a diverse set of biomarkers in the REHAB-HF trial would predict improvement in physical function following a 12-week tailored physical therapy rehabilitation intervention compared to attention control. Methods: The study population consisted of participants ≥60 years of age who were hospitalized with acute HF and randomized to a subsequent multidomain outpatient physical rehabilitation intervention vs. attention control with outcomes of 12-week functional change including the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Blood was collected prior to randomization and at 12-weeks for cardiac, renal, and inflammatory biomarkers. Linear trends across progressively higher biomarker values versus improvement in functional outcomes based on treatment assignment were evaluated. Classification and regression trees (CART) were created to estimate optimal biomarker levels associated with differential improvement in the two functional outcomes. Results: A total of 242 of 349 participants (69%) had baseline biomarkers measured. In an adjusted regression model, higher baseline cardiac troponin (cTn) I and T were associated with greater gains in SPPB and 6MWD respectively with the rehabilitation intervention (P=0.04 and 0.03 for interaction) versus attention control. In the CART analysis of the physical rehabilitation and attention control participants, those with baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥9.9 mg/L and hs-cTnT ≥36 ng/L receiving the rehabilitation intervention had a 129 m (95% CI 78-180m) greater 12-week 6MWD increase vs attention control. In contrast, for participants with CRP<9.9 mg/L there was no significant incremental 6MWD difference (30m, 95% CI -0.5m, 60.2m). For SPPB, a CRP ≥9.9 mg/L and creatinine ≥1.4 mg/dL optimally identified a differential improvement with the rehabilitation intervention versus attention control. The biomarkers (except for creatinine) decreased by 12 weeks post hospitalization but with no differences based on treatment assignment. Conclusion: Higher baseline levels of biomarkers of inflammation, cardiac injury, and renal dysfunction identified older adults after a HF hospitalization with the greatest differential improvement in physical function with a rehabilitation intervention. Biomarkers may help clinicians predict the benefits of this treatment.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Circulating biomarkers play an important role in patients with heart failure (HF) for risk stratification and mechanistic insights. We aimed to examine if a diverse set of biomarkers in the REHAB-HF trial would predict improvement in physical function following a 12-week tailored physical therapy rehabilitation intervention compared to attention control. Methods: The study population consisted of participants ≥60 years of age who were hospitalized with acute HF and randomized to a subsequent multidomain outpatient physical rehabilitation intervention vs. attention control with outcomes of 12-week functional change including the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD). Blood was collected prior to randomization and at 12-weeks for cardiac, renal, and inflammatory biomarkers. Linear trends across progressively higher biomarker values versus improvement in functional outcomes based on treatment assignment were evaluated. Classification and regression trees (CART) were created to estimate optimal biomarker levels associated with differential improvement in the two functional outcomes. Results: A total of 242 of 349 participants (69%) had baseline biomarkers measured. In an adjusted regression model, higher baseline cardiac troponin (cTn) I and T were associated with greater gains in SPPB and 6MWD respectively with the rehabilitation intervention (P=0.04 and 0.03 for interaction) versus attention control. In the CART analysis of the physical rehabilitation and attention control participants, those with baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥9.9 mg/L and hs-cTnT ≥36 ng/L receiving the rehabilitation intervention had a 129 m (95% CI 78-180m) greater 12-week 6MWD increase vs attention control. In contrast, for participants with CRP<9.9 mg/L there was no significant incremental 6MWD difference (30m, 95% CI -0.5m, 60.2m). For SPPB, a CRP ≥9.9 mg/L and creatinine ≥1.4 mg/dL optimally identified a differential improvement with the rehabilitation intervention versus attention control. The biomarkers (except for creatinine) decreased by 12 weeks post hospitalization but with no differences based on treatment assignment. Conclusion: Higher baseline levels of biomarkers of inflammation, cardiac injury, and renal dysfunction identified older adults after a HF hospitalization with the greatest differential improvement in physical function with a rehabilitation intervention. Biomarkers may help clinicians predict the benefits of this treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环生物标志物是老年病综合征住院老年人身体功能改善的预测因子:REHAB-HF试验结果
导言:循环生物标志物在心力衰竭(HF)患者的风险分层和机理研究中发挥着重要作用。我们的目的是研究 REHAB-HF 试验中的一组不同生物标志物是否能预测为期 12 周的定制物理治疗康复干预后身体功能的改善情况。研究方法研究对象包括年龄≥60岁的急性心房颤动住院患者,他们被随机分配到随后的多领域门诊物理康复干预中,与注意力对照组相比,12周的功能变化结果包括短期体能测试(SPPB)和6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。在随机化之前和 12 周时收集血液,检测心脏、肾脏和炎症生物标志物。根据治疗分配,评估了生物标志物值逐渐升高与功能结果改善之间的线性趋势。创建了分类和回归树 (CART),以估计与两种功能结果的不同改善相关的最佳生物标志物水平。结果:在 349 名参与者中,共有 242 人(69%)测量了基线生物标志物。在调整后的回归模型中,基线心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)I和T越高,康复干预的SPPB和6MWD的改善幅度就越大(交互作用P=0.04和0.03)。在对身体康复参与者和注意力控制参与者进行的CART分析中,基线C反应蛋白(CRP)≥9.9 mg/L且hs-cTnT≥36 ng/L的参与者接受康复干预后,与注意力控制参与者相比,12周6MWD增加了129米(95% CI 78-180米)。相比之下,CRP<9.9 mg/L 的参与者的 6MWD 增量差异不大(30 米,95% CI -0.5 米,60.2 米)。就 SPPB 而言,CRP ≥9.9 mg/L 和肌酐≥1.4 mg/dL 最能确定康复干预与注意力控制之间的差异。住院 12 周后,各项生物标志物(肌酐除外)均有所下降,但治疗分配没有差异。结论炎症、心脏损伤和肾功能障碍等生物标志物的基线水平较高,可以确定老年人在接受高血压住院治疗后,通过康复干预对身体功能的改善程度差异最大。生物标志物可帮助临床医生预测这种治疗的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Where Adults with Heart Failure Die: Insights from the CDC-WONDER Database A longitudinal study of depressive symptom trajectories and risk factors in congestive heart failure Right Ventricular Work and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Association Between Life's Essential 8 and Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Adults: Insights from NHANES 2007-2018 Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1