A synthetic review: natural history of amniote reproductive modes in light of comparative evolutionary genomics

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Biological Reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1111/brv.13145
X Maggs
{"title":"A synthetic review: natural history of amniote reproductive modes in light of comparative evolutionary genomics","authors":"X Maggs","doi":"10.1111/brv.13145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a current lack of consensus on whether the ancestral parity mode was oviparity (egg-laying) or viviparity (live-birth) in amniotes and particularly in squamates (snakes, lizards, and amphisbaenids). How transitions between parity modes occur at the genomic level has primary importance for how science conceptualises the origin of amniotes, and highly variable parity modes in Squamata. Synthesising literature from medicine, poultry science, reproductive biology, and evolutionary biology, I review the genomics and physiology of five broad processes (here termed the ‘Main Five’) expected to change during transitions between parity modes: eggshell formation, embryonic retention, placentation, calcium transport, and maternal–fetal immune dynamics. Throughout, I offer alternative perspectives and testable hypotheses regarding proximate causes of parity mode evolution in amniotes and squamates. If viviparity did evolve early in the history of lepidosaurs, I offer the nucleation site hypothesis as a proximate explanation. The framework of this hypothesis can be extended to amniotes to infer their ancestral state. I also provide a mechanism and hypothesis on how squamates may transition from viviparity to oviparity and make predictions about the directionality of transitions in three species. After considering evidence for differing perspectives on amniote origins, I offer a framework that unifies (<i>i</i>) the extended embryonic retention model and (<i>ii</i>) the traditional model which describes the amniote egg as an adaptation to the terrestrial environment. Additionally, this review contextualises the origin of amniotes and parity mode evolution within Medawar's paradigm. Medawar posited that pregnancy could be supported by immunosuppression, inertness, evasion, or immunological barriers. I demonstrate that this does not support gestation or gravidity across most amniotes but may be an adequate paradigm to explain how the first amniote tolerated internal fertilization and delayed egg deposition. In this context, the eggshell can be thought of as an immunological barrier. If serving as a barrier underpins the origin of the amniote eggshell, there should be evidence that oviparous gravidity can be met with a lack of immunological responses <i>in utero</i>. Rare examples of two species that differentially express very few genes during gravidity, suggestive of an absent immunological reaction to oviparous gravidity, are two skinks <i>Lampropholis guichenoti</i> and <i>Lerista bougainvillii</i>. These species may serve as good models for the original amniote egg. Overall, this review grounds itself in the historical literature while offering a modern perspective on the origin of amniotes. I encourage the scientific community to utilise this review as a resource in evolutionary and comparative genomics studies, embrace the complexity of the system, and thoughtfully consider the frameworks proposed.","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a current lack of consensus on whether the ancestral parity mode was oviparity (egg-laying) or viviparity (live-birth) in amniotes and particularly in squamates (snakes, lizards, and amphisbaenids). How transitions between parity modes occur at the genomic level has primary importance for how science conceptualises the origin of amniotes, and highly variable parity modes in Squamata. Synthesising literature from medicine, poultry science, reproductive biology, and evolutionary biology, I review the genomics and physiology of five broad processes (here termed the ‘Main Five’) expected to change during transitions between parity modes: eggshell formation, embryonic retention, placentation, calcium transport, and maternal–fetal immune dynamics. Throughout, I offer alternative perspectives and testable hypotheses regarding proximate causes of parity mode evolution in amniotes and squamates. If viviparity did evolve early in the history of lepidosaurs, I offer the nucleation site hypothesis as a proximate explanation. The framework of this hypothesis can be extended to amniotes to infer their ancestral state. I also provide a mechanism and hypothesis on how squamates may transition from viviparity to oviparity and make predictions about the directionality of transitions in three species. After considering evidence for differing perspectives on amniote origins, I offer a framework that unifies (i) the extended embryonic retention model and (ii) the traditional model which describes the amniote egg as an adaptation to the terrestrial environment. Additionally, this review contextualises the origin of amniotes and parity mode evolution within Medawar's paradigm. Medawar posited that pregnancy could be supported by immunosuppression, inertness, evasion, or immunological barriers. I demonstrate that this does not support gestation or gravidity across most amniotes but may be an adequate paradigm to explain how the first amniote tolerated internal fertilization and delayed egg deposition. In this context, the eggshell can be thought of as an immunological barrier. If serving as a barrier underpins the origin of the amniote eggshell, there should be evidence that oviparous gravidity can be met with a lack of immunological responses in utero. Rare examples of two species that differentially express very few genes during gravidity, suggestive of an absent immunological reaction to oviparous gravidity, are two skinks Lampropholis guichenoti and Lerista bougainvillii. These species may serve as good models for the original amniote egg. Overall, this review grounds itself in the historical literature while offering a modern perspective on the origin of amniotes. I encourage the scientific community to utilise this review as a resource in evolutionary and comparative genomics studies, embrace the complexity of the system, and thoughtfully consider the frameworks proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综述:从比较进化基因组学看羊膜动物生殖模式的自然史
关于羊膜动物,尤其是有鳞类动物(蛇、蜥蜴和两栖类)的祖先雌雄同位模式是卵生(产卵)还是胎生(活产),目前还缺乏共识。如何在基因组水平上实现雌雄同穴模式之间的转换,对于科学如何概念化羊膜动物的起源以及有鳞类动物高度多变的雌雄同穴模式至关重要。综合医学、家禽科学、生殖生物学和进化生物学的文献,我回顾了在奇偶模式转换过程中预计会发生变化的五大过程(这里称为 "主要五大过程")的基因组学和生理学:蛋壳形成、胚胎保留、胎盘形成、钙运输和母胎免疫动态。在整个过程中,我就羊膜动物和有鳞类动物奇偶模式进化的近因提出了不同的观点和可检验的假设。如果胎生模式确实是在表皮龙历史的早期进化而来,我提出了 "成核点假说"(nucleation site hypothesis)作为近似解释。这一假说的框架可以扩展到羊膜动物,以推断它们的祖先状态。我还提出了有鳞类如何从胎生过渡到卵生的机制和假说,并对三个物种过渡的方向性进行了预测。在考虑了有关羊膜动物起源的不同观点的证据之后,我提出了一个统一的框架:(i)扩展的胚胎保留模型和(ii)将羊膜动物卵描述为适应陆地环境的传统模型。此外,本综述还将羊膜动物的起源和奇偶模式的进化与梅达瓦的范式结合起来。梅达沃假设,怀孕可以通过免疫抑制、惰性、逃避或免疫障碍来支持。我的研究表明,这并不支持大多数羊膜动物的妊娠或怀孕,但这可能是解释第一种羊膜动物如何容忍体内受精和延迟卵子沉积的适当范式。在这种情况下,蛋壳可被视为免疫屏障。如果作为屏障的作用是羊膜动物蛋壳起源的基础,那么应该有证据表明,卵胎生的羊膜动物可以在子宫内缺乏免疫反应。在两个物种中,罕见的例子是 Lampropholis guichenoti 和 Lerista bougainvillii 这两种石龙子,它们在妊娠期只表达很少的基因,这表明它们对卵胎生妊娠没有免疫反应。这些物种可以作为原始羊膜虫卵的良好模型。总之,这篇综述立足于历史文献,同时提供了羊膜动物起源的现代视角。我鼓励科学界利用这篇综述作为进化和比较基因组学研究的资源,接受系统的复杂性,并深思熟虑所提出的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
期刊最新文献
Optimism and pessimism: a concept for behavioural ecology. Paleo-evo-devo implications of a revised conceptualization of enameloids and enamels. Anatomical adaptations of mangroves to the intertidal environment and their dynamic responses to various stresses. Invasion of the four kingdoms: the parasite journey across plant and non-plant hosts. Does death drive the scaling of life?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1