Salivary and Serum Analytes and Their Associations with Self-rated Health Among Healthy Young Adults

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1007/s12529-024-10322-1
Angelina Majeno, Douglas A. Granger, Crystal I. Bryce, Jenna L. Riis
{"title":"Salivary and Serum Analytes and Their Associations with Self-rated Health Among Healthy Young Adults","authors":"Angelina Majeno, Douglas A. Granger, Crystal I. Bryce, Jenna L. Riis","doi":"10.1007/s12529-024-10322-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Understanding the biological processes underlying poor self-rated health (SRH) can inform prevention efforts. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of using self-reported measures and self-collected biospecimens, such as saliva, to understand physiological functioning and assist with health surveillance and promotion. However, the associations between salivary analytes and SRH remain understudied. The current study addresses this gap.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>In a laboratory-based study, 99 healthy adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 23.8 years, SD = 4.5, 55% men, 43% non-Hispanic White) reported their SRH and provided saliva and blood samples that were assayed for adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), uric acid (UA), and cytokines (IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, TNF-α). Principal component analyses assessed the component loadings and generated factor scores for saliva and serum analytes. Binary logistic regressions examined the associations between these components and poor SRH.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Salivary analytes loaded onto two components (component 1: adiponectin and cytokines; component 2: CRP and UA) explaining 58% of the variance. Serum analytes grouped onto three components (component 1: IL-8 and TNF-α; component 2: CRP, IL-1β, and IL-6; component 3: adiponectin and UA) explaining 76% of the variance. Higher salivary component 1 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 1.53, 95%CI [1.10, 2.11]). Higher serum component 2 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 2.37, 95%CI [1.20, 4.67]). When examined in the same model, salivary component 1 (OR 1.79, 95%CI [1.17, 2.75]) and serum component 2 were associated with poorer SRH (OR 7.74, 95%CI [2.18, 27.40]).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In our sample, whether measured in saliva or serum, indices of inflammatory processes were associated with SRH.</p>","PeriodicalId":54208,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-024-10322-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding the biological processes underlying poor self-rated health (SRH) can inform prevention efforts. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of using self-reported measures and self-collected biospecimens, such as saliva, to understand physiological functioning and assist with health surveillance and promotion. However, the associations between salivary analytes and SRH remain understudied. The current study addresses this gap.

Methods

In a laboratory-based study, 99 healthy adults (Mage = 23.8 years, SD = 4.5, 55% men, 43% non-Hispanic White) reported their SRH and provided saliva and blood samples that were assayed for adiponectin, C-reactive protein (CRP), uric acid (UA), and cytokines (IL‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐8, TNF-α). Principal component analyses assessed the component loadings and generated factor scores for saliva and serum analytes. Binary logistic regressions examined the associations between these components and poor SRH.

Results

Salivary analytes loaded onto two components (component 1: adiponectin and cytokines; component 2: CRP and UA) explaining 58% of the variance. Serum analytes grouped onto three components (component 1: IL-8 and TNF-α; component 2: CRP, IL-1β, and IL-6; component 3: adiponectin and UA) explaining 76% of the variance. Higher salivary component 1 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 1.53, 95%CI [1.10, 2.11]). Higher serum component 2 scores predicted higher odds of reporting poor SRH (OR 2.37, 95%CI [1.20, 4.67]). When examined in the same model, salivary component 1 (OR 1.79, 95%CI [1.17, 2.75]) and serum component 2 were associated with poorer SRH (OR 7.74, 95%CI [2.18, 27.40]).

Conclusions

In our sample, whether measured in saliva or serum, indices of inflammatory processes were associated with SRH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康年轻人的唾液和血清分析物及其与自评健康状况的关系
背景了解不良自评健康状况(SRH)背后的生物过程可为预防工作提供依据。COVID-19 大流行凸显了使用自我报告的测量方法和自我采集的生物样本(如唾液)来了解生理功能并协助健康监测和促进的重要性。然而,唾液分析物与性健康和生殖健康之间的关系仍未得到充分研究。方法在一项基于实验室的研究中,99 名健康成年人(年龄 = 23.8 岁,SD = 4.5,55% 为男性,43% 为非西班牙裔白人)报告了他们的 SRH,并提供了唾液和血液样本,对这些样本进行了脂肪连蛋白、C 反应蛋白 (CRP)、尿酸 (UA) 和细胞因子(IL-1β、IL-6、IL-8、TNF-α)的检测。主成分分析评估了成分负荷,并生成了唾液和血清分析物的因子得分。结果唾液分析物载入两个成分(成分 1:脂肪连素和细胞因子;成分 2:CRP 和 UA),解释了 58% 的方差。血清分析物分为三个成分(成分 1:IL-8 和 TNF-α;成分 2:CRP、IL-1β 和 IL-6;成分 3:脂肪连接蛋白和 UA),解释了 76% 的方差。唾液成分 1 分数越高,报告 SRH 较差的几率越高(OR 1.53,95%CI [1.10,2.11])。血清成分 2 分数越高,报告 SRH 较差的几率越高(OR 2.37,95%CI [1.20,4.67])。结论在我们的样本中,无论是唾液还是血清,炎症过程指数都与 SRH 相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (IJBM) is the official scientific journal of the International Society for Behavioral Medicine (ISBM). IJBM seeks to present the best theoretically-driven, evidence-based work in the field of behavioral medicine from around the globe. IJBM embraces multiple theoretical perspectives, research methodologies, groups of interest, and levels of analysis. The journal is interested in research across the broad spectrum of behavioral medicine, including health-behavior relationships, the prevention of illness and the promotion of health, the effects of illness on the self and others, the effectiveness of novel interventions, identification of biobehavioral mechanisms, and the influence of social factors on health. We welcome experimental, non-experimental, quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies as well as implementation and dissemination research, integrative reviews, and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Salivary and Serum Analytes and Their Associations with Self-rated Health Among Healthy Young Adults Progress Toward Meaning-as-Goal and Its Association with Pain, Functioning, and Global Meaning and Purpose Among Veterans with Co-occurring Chronic Pain and PTSD Neighborhood Characteristics Related to Changes in Anthropometrics During a Lifestyle Intervention for Persons with Obesity Exploring the Effects of Coping Flexibility on Sleep Quality via Subjective Distress: A Longitudinal Study of Young Adults Effect of Psychological Intervention on Quality of Life Among Patients with Psoriasis: A Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1