The Doctor Who Would Be King by Guillaume Lachenal (review)

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Bulletin of the History of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1353/bhm.2024.a937509
Matthew M. Heaton
{"title":"The Doctor Who Would Be King by Guillaume Lachenal (review)","authors":"Matthew M. Heaton","doi":"10.1353/bhm.2024.a937509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Doctor Who Would Be King</em> by Guillaume Lachenal <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Matthew M. Heaton </li> </ul> Guillaume Lachenal. <em>The Doctor Who Would Be King</em>. Trans. Cheryl Smeall. Theory in Forms. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2022. x + 301 pp. Ill. $28.95 (978-1-4780-1786-8). <p>In this rather idiosyncratic volume, Lachenal recounts the life and times of Dr. John Joseph David, a French colonial army doctor who twice found himself in the position of acting as a high-level colonial administrator of French-controlled territories, first on Wallis Island in the South Pacific (1933–38) and later in the Haut-Nyong province of Cameroon (1939–44). In both instances, Dr. David took on responsibilities above and beyond the traditional role of a colonial doctor and in the process established regimes effectively governed by principles of public health, fundamentally linking prospects for economic development and effective administration to the health and well-being of indigenous populations. In both places, David also developed something of a cult of personality, remembered mostly as strong, capable, and variously kind and severe, depending on the circumstances. David’s bearing was so regal that he became known colloquially as “Emperor” in Haut-Nyongo, and as “King” in Wallis, despite never holding either title within French or indigenous political structures.</p> <p>Telling the story of Dr. David, however, is more easily conceptualized than executed. The Haut-Nyong efforts in medical administration seemed novel on first blush, but ultimately “[led] to a somewhat disappointing conclusion: ‘the Haut-Nyong experiment was not very original, neither in substance nor in form’” (p. 74). Though based on principles of prioritizing public health, David’s developmentalist administration ultimately looked very much like other colonial projects of the time, despite being run by doctors. Hoping that David’s earlier odyssey in Wallis might provide insights to reinvigorate the search for historical significance, Lachenal delves into what for him are new and uncharted waters. In Wallis he uncovers another episode of quintessential colonial bravado, in which David insinuated himself into the local political system and instituted significant economic reforms to incorporate Wallis into the imperial economy. But the story here fizzled out, too, with David leaving unceremoniously in the wake of a catastrophic epidemic of typhoid fever, without much to show for his time as “king.” <strong>[End Page 328]</strong> Ultimately, Lachenal laments, “Wallis would be a case study that would have no instance of any generality, except . . . that of ‘micro-insularity’ itself” (p. 137).</p> <p>Lachenal does his due diligence, but the documentary record of David’s tenure is spotty at best. Oral interviews with friends and associates of Dr. David’s in Cameroon and Wallis produce a range of impressions and artefacts, memories and laments denoting “traces” of a past that lingers in the present but which do not cohere into a clear narrative or compelling historical argument. Indeed, the failure of David’s ambitious endeavors are themselves instructive in this regard: “if what you work on is insignificant, you risk falling off the map” (p. 137), Lachenal writes. What are historians to do when the time is spent, the research exhausted, but the stories are not terribly revelatory and the books must still be written?</p> <p>The answer for Lachenal is to focus on the journey, not the destination. Though the book does provide standard historical narrative and context for David’s adventures, it focuses as much if not more time on Lachenal’s personal process of discovery. The reader accompanies Lachenal in various archives as he uncovers new pieces of information and engages with them. We sit alongside him as he interviews informants, searches for old machetes, and does a guest spot on local TV news. “Investigations like this are like a treasure hunt,” he argues (p. 135). Frequent references to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness make clear that Lachenal is constructing himself as a foil to Dr. David, positioning himself as Marlow in search of David’s Kurtz. He becomes enthralled by the ephemera, the “traces” of David in the present, and posits that this, really, is the point of it all. “I am rather interested in forms of material, proven, tangible presences from the past, but the existence of which...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":55304,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2024.a937509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by:

  • The Doctor Who Would Be King by Guillaume Lachenal
  • Matthew M. Heaton
Guillaume Lachenal. The Doctor Who Would Be King. Trans. Cheryl Smeall. Theory in Forms. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2022. x + 301 pp. Ill. $28.95 (978-1-4780-1786-8).

In this rather idiosyncratic volume, Lachenal recounts the life and times of Dr. John Joseph David, a French colonial army doctor who twice found himself in the position of acting as a high-level colonial administrator of French-controlled territories, first on Wallis Island in the South Pacific (1933–38) and later in the Haut-Nyong province of Cameroon (1939–44). In both instances, Dr. David took on responsibilities above and beyond the traditional role of a colonial doctor and in the process established regimes effectively governed by principles of public health, fundamentally linking prospects for economic development and effective administration to the health and well-being of indigenous populations. In both places, David also developed something of a cult of personality, remembered mostly as strong, capable, and variously kind and severe, depending on the circumstances. David’s bearing was so regal that he became known colloquially as “Emperor” in Haut-Nyongo, and as “King” in Wallis, despite never holding either title within French or indigenous political structures.

Telling the story of Dr. David, however, is more easily conceptualized than executed. The Haut-Nyong efforts in medical administration seemed novel on first blush, but ultimately “[led] to a somewhat disappointing conclusion: ‘the Haut-Nyong experiment was not very original, neither in substance nor in form’” (p. 74). Though based on principles of prioritizing public health, David’s developmentalist administration ultimately looked very much like other colonial projects of the time, despite being run by doctors. Hoping that David’s earlier odyssey in Wallis might provide insights to reinvigorate the search for historical significance, Lachenal delves into what for him are new and uncharted waters. In Wallis he uncovers another episode of quintessential colonial bravado, in which David insinuated himself into the local political system and instituted significant economic reforms to incorporate Wallis into the imperial economy. But the story here fizzled out, too, with David leaving unceremoniously in the wake of a catastrophic epidemic of typhoid fever, without much to show for his time as “king.” [End Page 328] Ultimately, Lachenal laments, “Wallis would be a case study that would have no instance of any generality, except . . . that of ‘micro-insularity’ itself” (p. 137).

Lachenal does his due diligence, but the documentary record of David’s tenure is spotty at best. Oral interviews with friends and associates of Dr. David’s in Cameroon and Wallis produce a range of impressions and artefacts, memories and laments denoting “traces” of a past that lingers in the present but which do not cohere into a clear narrative or compelling historical argument. Indeed, the failure of David’s ambitious endeavors are themselves instructive in this regard: “if what you work on is insignificant, you risk falling off the map” (p. 137), Lachenal writes. What are historians to do when the time is spent, the research exhausted, but the stories are not terribly revelatory and the books must still be written?

The answer for Lachenal is to focus on the journey, not the destination. Though the book does provide standard historical narrative and context for David’s adventures, it focuses as much if not more time on Lachenal’s personal process of discovery. The reader accompanies Lachenal in various archives as he uncovers new pieces of information and engages with them. We sit alongside him as he interviews informants, searches for old machetes, and does a guest spot on local TV news. “Investigations like this are like a treasure hunt,” he argues (p. 135). Frequent references to Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness make clear that Lachenal is constructing himself as a foil to Dr. David, positioning himself as Marlow in search of David’s Kurtz. He becomes enthralled by the ephemera, the “traces” of David in the present, and posits that this, really, is the point of it all. “I am rather interested in forms of material, proven, tangible presences from the past, but the existence of which...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪尧姆-拉谢纳尔(Guillaume Lachenal)的《会成为国王的博士》(评论
评论者: 马修-M-希顿(Matthew M. Heaton)著,纪尧姆-拉谢纳尔(Guillaume Lachenal)译,《会成为国王的博士》(The Doctor Who Would Be King)。会成为国王的博士》。Trans.谢丽尔-斯米尔。形式的理论》。北卡罗来纳州达勒姆:杜克大学出版社,2022 年。x + 301 pp.插图,28.95 美元 (978-1-4780-1786-8)。约翰-约瑟夫-戴维博士是法国殖民地时期的军医,他曾两次担任法国控制领土的高级殖民行政长官,第一次是在南太平洋的瓦利斯岛(1933-1938 年),后来是在喀麦隆的上尼永省(1939-194 年)。在这两个地方,戴维医生都承担了超越殖民地医生传统角色的责任,并在此过程中建立了有效遵循公共卫生原则的制度,从根本上将经济发展前景和有效管理与土著居民的健康和福祉联系起来。在这两个地方,戴维还形成了某种个人崇拜,在人们的记忆中,他大多是强壮、能干的,而且根据具体情况,有不同的仁慈和严厉。戴维的举止非常威严,以至于他在上尼永戈被称为 "皇帝",在瓦利斯被称为 "国王",尽管他在法国或土著政治结构中从未拥有过这两个头衔。然而,讲述戴维博士的故事更容易概念化,而不是执行。上尼永省在医疗管理方面的努力乍一看似乎很新颖,但最终"[导致]得出了一个有点令人失望的结论:'上尼永省的实验无论是在实质上还是在形式上都不是很新颖'"(第 74 页)。尽管戴维的发展主义管理以公共卫生优先原则为基础,但最终看起来与当时其他殖民项目非常相似,尽管是由医生管理的。Lachenal 希望戴维早先在瓦利斯的探险经历能为重新探寻历史意义提供启示,于是他进入了对他来说未知的新领域。在瓦利斯,他发现了另一个典型的殖民主义虚张声势的插曲,在这个插曲中,戴维融入了当地的政治体系,并实施了重大的经济改革,将瓦利斯纳入帝国经济。但故事在这里也戛然而止,大卫在一场灾难性的伤寒疫情后黯然离去,没有为他的 "国王 "生涯留下什么。[最后,拉切纳尔感叹道:"除了......'微观个体性'本身之外,沃利斯将是一个没有任何普遍性实例的案例研究"(第 137 页)。Lachenal 做出了应有的努力,但有关 David 任期的文献记录充其量也是零星的。对戴维博士在喀麦隆和瓦利斯的朋友和同事进行的口述访谈产生了一系列印象和人工制品、回忆和感叹,这些都是过去的 "痕迹",它们在现在仍挥之不去,但并没有形成清晰的叙事或令人信服的历史论证。事实上,戴维雄心勃勃的努力的失败本身就说明了这一点:拉切纳尔写道:"如果你所从事的工作微不足道,你就有可能从地图上消失"(第 137 页)。当时间已经耗尽,研究已经穷尽,但故事却没有什么启示性,而书还必须写的时候,历史学家该怎么办?拉切纳尔的答案是专注于旅程,而不是目的地。虽然本书为大卫的冒险提供了标准的历史叙事和背景,但它同样甚至更多地将重点放在了拉切纳尔的个人探索过程上。读者在各种档案中陪伴拉切纳尔发现新的信息并与之交流。我们与他并肩采访线人、寻找旧砍刀,并在当地电视新闻中做客。他认为,"这样的调查就像寻宝"(第 135 页)。他经常提到约瑟夫-康拉德的《黑暗之心》,这清楚地表明 Lachenal 将自己塑造成大卫博士的陪衬,将自己定位为寻找大卫的库尔兹的马洛。他迷上了短暂的记忆,迷上了戴维在当下留下的 "痕迹",并认为这才是一切的意义所在。"我对各种形式的物质、已被证实的、有形的、来自过去的存在很感兴趣,但它们的存在......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the History of Medicine
Bulletin of the History of Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field for more than three quarters of a century, the Bulletin spans the social, cultural, and scientific aspects of the history of medicine worldwide. Every issue includes reviews of recent books on medical history. Recurring sections include Digital Humanities & Public History and Pedagogy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine is the official publication of the American Association for the History of Medicine (AAHM) and the Johns Hopkins Institute of the History of Medicine.
期刊最新文献
An Artificial Appetite: The Nineteenth-Century Struggle to Define Habitual Drunkenness Segregated in Life and Death: Arnold R. Rich and the Racial Science of Tuberculosis A Tribute to Caroline Catherine Hannaway (1943–2024) The Citizen as a Public Health Actor: Complaints as Public Engagement with Aedes Mosquito Control in Singapore, 1965–1985 A Clinic for the People: Toward an Antiracist Psychiatry at the Tuskegee Institute 1947–1965
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1