Industry Perspective on First-in-Human and Clinical Pharmacology Strategies to Support Clinical Development of T-Cell Engaging Bispecific Antibodies for Cancer Therapy.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3439
Prathap Nagaraja Shastri,Nirav Shah,Martin Lechmann,Hardik Mody,Marc W Retter,Min Zhu,Tommy Li,Jun Wang,Naveed Shaik,Xirong Zheng,Meric Ovacik,Fei Hua,Vibha Jawa,Christophe Boetsch,Yanguang Cao,John Burke,Kaushik Datta,Kapil Gadkar,Vijay Upreti,Alison Betts
{"title":"Industry Perspective on First-in-Human and Clinical Pharmacology Strategies to Support Clinical Development of T-Cell Engaging Bispecific Antibodies for Cancer Therapy.","authors":"Prathap Nagaraja Shastri,Nirav Shah,Martin Lechmann,Hardik Mody,Marc W Retter,Min Zhu,Tommy Li,Jun Wang,Naveed Shaik,Xirong Zheng,Meric Ovacik,Fei Hua,Vibha Jawa,Christophe Boetsch,Yanguang Cao,John Burke,Kaushik Datta,Kapil Gadkar,Vijay Upreti,Alison Betts","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (TCEs) that target tumor antigens and T cells have shown great promise in treating cancer, particularly in hematological indications. The clinical development of TCEs often involves a lengthy first-in-human (FIH) trial with many dose-escalation cohorts leading up to an early proof of concept (POC), enabling either a no-go decision or dose selection for further clinical development. Multiple factors related to the target, product, disease, and patient population influence the efficacy and safety of TCEs. The intricate mechanism of action limits the translatability of preclinical models to the clinic, thereby posing challenges to streamline clinical development. In addition, unlike traditional chemotherapy, the top dose and recommended phase II doses (RP2Ds) for TCEs in the clinic are often not guided by the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), but rather based on the integrated dose-response assessment of the benefit/risk profile. These uncertainties pose complex challenges for translational and clinical pharmacologists (PK/PD scientists), as well as clinicians, to design an efficient clinical study that guides development. To that end, experts in the field, under the umbrella of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, have reviewed learnings from published literature and currently marketed products to share perspectives on the FIH and clinical pharmacology strategies to support early clinical development of TCEs.","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (TCEs) that target tumor antigens and T cells have shown great promise in treating cancer, particularly in hematological indications. The clinical development of TCEs often involves a lengthy first-in-human (FIH) trial with many dose-escalation cohorts leading up to an early proof of concept (POC), enabling either a no-go decision or dose selection for further clinical development. Multiple factors related to the target, product, disease, and patient population influence the efficacy and safety of TCEs. The intricate mechanism of action limits the translatability of preclinical models to the clinic, thereby posing challenges to streamline clinical development. In addition, unlike traditional chemotherapy, the top dose and recommended phase II doses (RP2Ds) for TCEs in the clinic are often not guided by the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), but rather based on the integrated dose-response assessment of the benefit/risk profile. These uncertainties pose complex challenges for translational and clinical pharmacologists (PK/PD scientists), as well as clinicians, to design an efficient clinical study that guides development. To that end, experts in the field, under the umbrella of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, have reviewed learnings from published literature and currently marketed products to share perspectives on the FIH and clinical pharmacology strategies to support early clinical development of TCEs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持用于癌症治疗的 T 细胞特异性双特异性抗体临床开发的首次人体试验和临床药理策略的行业视角。
靶向肿瘤抗原和 T 细胞的 T 细胞靶向双特异性抗体 (TCE) 在治疗癌症,尤其是血液病适应症方面大有可为。双特异性抗体的临床开发通常需要经过漫长的首次人体试验(FIH)和多次剂量递增试验,最终获得早期概念验证(POC),从而决定是否进行进一步的临床开发或选择剂量。与靶点、产品、疾病和患者群体有关的多种因素会影响 TCE 的疗效和安全性。复杂的作用机制限制了临床前模型向临床的转化,从而为简化临床开发带来了挑战。此外,与传统化疗不同,TCEs 在临床中的最高剂量和二期推荐剂量(RP2D)往往不是以最大耐受剂量(MTD)为指导,而是基于对获益/风险概况的综合剂量-反应评估。这些不确定性给转化和临床药理学家(PK/PD 科学家)以及临床医生带来了复杂的挑战,如何才能设计出高效的临床研究来指导研发工作?为此,该领域的专家们在美国医药科学家协会的支持下,回顾了从已发表的文献和目前上市的产品中学到的知识,分享了对 FIH 和临床药理策略的看法,以支持 TCE 的早期临床开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Cerebral Ischemia Protection After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: CSF Nimodipine Levels After Intravenous Versus Oral Nimodipine Administration. Contemporary Use of β-Blockers in Heart Failure Patients With and Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Database Analysis. Correction to Effectively Leveraging RWD for External Controls: A Systematic Literature Review of Regulatory and HTA Decisions. Infection Risk Associated with High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study. In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1