A SHAP-based controversy analysis through communities on Twitter

Samy Benslimane, Thomas Papastergiou, Jérôme Azé, Sandra Bringay, Maximilien Servajean, Caroline Mollevi
{"title":"A SHAP-based controversy analysis through communities on Twitter","authors":"Samy Benslimane, Thomas Papastergiou, Jérôme Azé, Sandra Bringay, Maximilien Servajean, Caroline Mollevi","doi":"10.1007/s11280-024-01278-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Controversy encompasses content that draws diverse perspectives, along with positive and negative feedback on a specific event, resulting in the formation of distinct user communities. we explore the explainability of controversy through the lens of SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method, aiming to provide a fair assessment of the individual contributions of different text features of tweets to controversy detection. We conduct an analysis of topic discussions on Twitter from a community perspective, investigating the role of text in accurately classifying tweets into their respective communities. To achieve this, we introduce a SHAP-based pipeline designed to quantify the influence of impactful text features on the predictions of three tweet classifiers. Text content alone offers interesting controversy detection accuracy. It can contain predictive features for controversy detection. For instance, negative connotations, pejorative tendencies and positive qualifying adjectives tend to impact the controversy model detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":501180,"journal":{"name":"World Wide Web","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Wide Web","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-024-01278-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controversy encompasses content that draws diverse perspectives, along with positive and negative feedback on a specific event, resulting in the formation of distinct user communities. we explore the explainability of controversy through the lens of SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method, aiming to provide a fair assessment of the individual contributions of different text features of tweets to controversy detection. We conduct an analysis of topic discussions on Twitter from a community perspective, investigating the role of text in accurately classifying tweets into their respective communities. To achieve this, we introduce a SHAP-based pipeline designed to quantify the influence of impactful text features on the predictions of three tweet classifiers. Text content alone offers interesting controversy detection accuracy. It can contain predictive features for controversy detection. For instance, negative connotations, pejorative tendencies and positive qualifying adjectives tend to impact the controversy model detection.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 Twitter 上的社区进行基于 SHAP 的争议分析
我们通过 SHAP(SHapley Additive exPlanations)方法探索争议的可解释性,旨在对推文不同文本特征对争议检测的贡献进行公平评估。我们从社区的角度对 Twitter 上的话题讨论进行分析,研究文本在将推文准确分类到各自社区中的作用。为此,我们引入了基于 SHAP 的管道,旨在量化有影响力的文本特征对三种推文分类器预测的影响。仅文本内容就能提供有趣的争议检测准确率。它可以包含争议检测的预测特征。例如,负面内涵、贬义倾向和正面修饰形容词往往会影响争议模型的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HetFS: a method for fast similarity search with ad-hoc meta-paths on heterogeneous information networks A SHAP-based controversy analysis through communities on Twitter pFind: Privacy-preserving lost object finding in vehicular crowdsensing Use of prompt-based learning for code-mixed and code-switched text classification Drug traceability system based on semantic blockchain and on a reputation method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1