The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Current challenges and future directions for shared decision making for lung cancer screening

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35382
Robert J. Volk PhD, Ronald E. Myers DSW, PhD, Douglas Arenberg MD, Tanner J. Caverly MD, MPH, Richard M. Hoffman MD, MPH, Hormuzd A. Katki PhD, Peter J. Mazzone MD, MPH, Benjamin W. Moulton JD, MPH, Daniel S. Reuland MD, MPH, Nichole T. Tanner MD, MSCR, Robert A. Smith PhD, Renda Soylemez Wiener MD, MPH
{"title":"The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Current challenges and future directions for shared decision making for lung cancer screening","authors":"Robert J. Volk PhD,&nbsp;Ronald E. Myers DSW, PhD,&nbsp;Douglas Arenberg MD,&nbsp;Tanner J. Caverly MD, MPH,&nbsp;Richard M. Hoffman MD, MPH,&nbsp;Hormuzd A. Katki PhD,&nbsp;Peter J. Mazzone MD, MPH,&nbsp;Benjamin W. Moulton JD, MPH,&nbsp;Daniel S. Reuland MD, MPH,&nbsp;Nichole T. Tanner MD, MSCR,&nbsp;Robert A. Smith PhD,&nbsp;Renda Soylemez Wiener MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shared decision making (SDM) between health care professionals and patients is essential to help patients make well informed choices about lung cancer screening (LCS). Patients who participate in SDM have greater LCS knowledge, reduced decisional conflict, and improved adherence to annual screening compared with patients who do not participate in SDM. SDM tools are acceptable to patients and clinicians. The importance of SDM in LCS is emphasized in recommendations from professional organizations and highlighted as a priority in the 2022 President's Cancer Panel Report. The updated 2022 national coverage determination from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services reaffirms the value of SDM in offering LCS to eligible beneficiaries. The Shared Decision-Making Task Group of the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable undertook a group consensus process to identify priorities for research and implementation related to SDM for LCS and then evaluated current knowledge in these areas. Priority areas included: (1) developing feasible, adaptable SDM training programs for health care professionals; (2) understanding the impact of alternative health system LCS models on SDM practice and outcomes; (3) developing and evaluating new patient decision aids for use with diverse populations and in varied settings; (4) offering conceptual clarity about what constitutes a high-quality decision and developing appropriate quality measures; and (5) studying the use of prediction-augmented screening to support SDM in practice. Gaps in current research in all areas were observed. The authors conclude with a research and implementation agenda to advance the quality and implementation of SDM for persons who might benefit from LCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"130 23","pages":"3996-4011"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35382","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35382","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared decision making (SDM) between health care professionals and patients is essential to help patients make well informed choices about lung cancer screening (LCS). Patients who participate in SDM have greater LCS knowledge, reduced decisional conflict, and improved adherence to annual screening compared with patients who do not participate in SDM. SDM tools are acceptable to patients and clinicians. The importance of SDM in LCS is emphasized in recommendations from professional organizations and highlighted as a priority in the 2022 President's Cancer Panel Report. The updated 2022 national coverage determination from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services reaffirms the value of SDM in offering LCS to eligible beneficiaries. The Shared Decision-Making Task Group of the American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable undertook a group consensus process to identify priorities for research and implementation related to SDM for LCS and then evaluated current knowledge in these areas. Priority areas included: (1) developing feasible, adaptable SDM training programs for health care professionals; (2) understanding the impact of alternative health system LCS models on SDM practice and outcomes; (3) developing and evaluating new patient decision aids for use with diverse populations and in varied settings; (4) offering conceptual clarity about what constitutes a high-quality decision and developing appropriate quality measures; and (5) studying the use of prediction-augmented screening to support SDM in practice. Gaps in current research in all areas were observed. The authors conclude with a research and implementation agenda to advance the quality and implementation of SDM for persons who might benefit from LCS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国癌症协会全国肺癌圆桌会议战略计划:肺癌筛查共同决策的当前挑战和未来方向
医护人员和患者之间的共同决策(SDM)对于帮助患者就肺癌筛查(LCS)做出明智的选择至关重要。与未参与 SDM 的患者相比,参与 SDM 的患者对肺癌筛查有更多的了解,减少了决策冲突,并提高了对年度筛查的依从性。患者和临床医生都能接受 SDM 工具。专业组织的建议强调了 SDM 在 LCS 中的重要性,2022 年总统癌症小组报告也将其作为优先事项加以强调。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)更新的 2022 年国家覆盖范围决定重申了 SDM 在向符合条件的受益人提供 LCS 方面的价值。美国癌症协会全国肺癌圆桌会议的共同决策工作组开展了一项小组共识程序,以确定与 LCS 的 SDM 相关的研究和实施优先事项,然后对这些领域的现有知识进行评估。优先领域包括(1) 为医疗保健专业人员制定可行的、适应性强的 SDM 培训计划;(2) 了解替代性医疗系统 LCS 模式对 SDM 实践和结果的影响;(3) 开发和评估新的患者决策辅助工具,用于不同人群和不同环境;(4) 从概念上明确什么是高质量的决策,并制定适当的质量衡量标准;(5) 研究使用预测增强筛查来支持实践中的 SDM。在所有领域,目前的研究都存在差距。最后,作者提出了一项研究和实施议程,以提高 SDM 的质量,并为可能从 LCS 中受益的人实施 SDM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Disparities in cancer incidence by sexual orientation. Considering screening for hereditary cancer syndromes at the time of obstetrical prenatal carrier screening. Clinical outcomes of ruxolitinib treatment in 595 intermediate-1 risk patients with myelofibrosis: The RUX-MF Real-World Study. Changes in Merkel cell oncoprotein antibodies after radiation therapy in curatively treated Merkel cell carcinoma and association with recurrence. Association between racial residential segregation and screening uptake for colorectal and cervical cancer among Black and White patients in five US health care systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1