Mei Han, Lulu Wang, Jianming Chang, Bixin Li, Chunguang Zhang
{"title":"Learning Graph-based Patch Representations for Identifying and Assessing Silent Vulnerability Fixes","authors":"Mei Han, Lulu Wang, Jianming Chang, Bixin Li, Chunguang Zhang","doi":"arxiv-2409.08512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software projects are dependent on many third-party libraries, therefore\nhigh-risk vulnerabilities can propagate through the dependency chain to\ndownstream projects. Owing to the subjective nature of patch management,\nsoftware vendors commonly fix vulnerabilities silently. Silent vulnerability\nfixes cause downstream software to be unaware of urgent security issues in a\ntimely manner, posing a security risk to the software. Presently, most of the\nexisting works for vulnerability fix identification only consider the changed\ncode as a sequential textual sequence, ignoring the structural information of\nthe code. In this paper, we propose GRAPE, a GRAph-based Patch rEpresentation\nthat aims to 1) provide a unified framework for getting vulnerability fix\npatches representation; and 2) enhance the understanding of the intent and\npotential impact of patches by extracting structural information of the code.\nGRAPE employs a novel joint graph structure (MCPG) to represent the syntactic\nand semantic information of fix patches and embeds both nodes and edges.\nSubsequently, a carefully designed graph convolutional neural network (NE-GCN)\nis utilized to fully learn structural features by leveraging the attributes of\nthe nodes and edges. Moreover, we construct a dataset containing 2251 silent\nfixes. For the experimental section, we evaluated patch representation on three\ntasks, including vulnerability fix identification, vulnerability types\nclassification, and vulnerability severity classification. Experimental results\nindicate that, in comparison to baseline methods, GRAPE can more effectively\nreduce false positives and omissions of vulnerability fixes identification and\nprovide accurate vulnerability assessments.","PeriodicalId":501278,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Software projects are dependent on many third-party libraries, therefore
high-risk vulnerabilities can propagate through the dependency chain to
downstream projects. Owing to the subjective nature of patch management,
software vendors commonly fix vulnerabilities silently. Silent vulnerability
fixes cause downstream software to be unaware of urgent security issues in a
timely manner, posing a security risk to the software. Presently, most of the
existing works for vulnerability fix identification only consider the changed
code as a sequential textual sequence, ignoring the structural information of
the code. In this paper, we propose GRAPE, a GRAph-based Patch rEpresentation
that aims to 1) provide a unified framework for getting vulnerability fix
patches representation; and 2) enhance the understanding of the intent and
potential impact of patches by extracting structural information of the code.
GRAPE employs a novel joint graph structure (MCPG) to represent the syntactic
and semantic information of fix patches and embeds both nodes and edges.
Subsequently, a carefully designed graph convolutional neural network (NE-GCN)
is utilized to fully learn structural features by leveraging the attributes of
the nodes and edges. Moreover, we construct a dataset containing 2251 silent
fixes. For the experimental section, we evaluated patch representation on three
tasks, including vulnerability fix identification, vulnerability types
classification, and vulnerability severity classification. Experimental results
indicate that, in comparison to baseline methods, GRAPE can more effectively
reduce false positives and omissions of vulnerability fixes identification and
provide accurate vulnerability assessments.