Ahmet Kapkiç, Pratanu Mandal, Shu Wan, Paras Sheth, Abhinav Gorantla, Yoonhyuk Choi, Huan Liu, K. Selçuk Candan
{"title":"Introducing CausalBench: A Flexible Benchmark Framework for Causal Analysis and Machine Learning","authors":"Ahmet Kapkiç, Pratanu Mandal, Shu Wan, Paras Sheth, Abhinav Gorantla, Yoonhyuk Choi, Huan Liu, K. Selçuk Candan","doi":"arxiv-2409.08419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While witnessing the exceptional success of machine learning (ML)\ntechnologies in many applications, users are starting to notice a critical\nshortcoming of ML: correlation is a poor substitute for causation. The\nconventional way to discover causal relationships is to use randomized\ncontrolled experiments (RCT); in many situations, however, these are\nimpractical or sometimes unethical. Causal learning from observational data\noffers a promising alternative. While being relatively recent, causal learning\naims to go far beyond conventional machine learning, yet several major\nchallenges remain. Unfortunately, advances are hampered due to the lack of\nunified benchmark datasets, algorithms, metrics, and evaluation service\ninterfaces for causal learning. In this paper, we introduce {\\em CausalBench},\na transparent, fair, and easy-to-use evaluation platform, aiming to (a) enable\nthe advancement of research in causal learning by facilitating scientific\ncollaboration in novel algorithms, datasets, and metrics and (b) promote\nscientific objectivity, reproducibility, fairness, and awareness of bias in\ncausal learning research. CausalBench provides services for benchmarking data,\nalgorithms, models, and metrics, impacting the needs of a broad of scientific\nand engineering disciplines.","PeriodicalId":501340,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Machine Learning","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While witnessing the exceptional success of machine learning (ML)
technologies in many applications, users are starting to notice a critical
shortcoming of ML: correlation is a poor substitute for causation. The
conventional way to discover causal relationships is to use randomized
controlled experiments (RCT); in many situations, however, these are
impractical or sometimes unethical. Causal learning from observational data
offers a promising alternative. While being relatively recent, causal learning
aims to go far beyond conventional machine learning, yet several major
challenges remain. Unfortunately, advances are hampered due to the lack of
unified benchmark datasets, algorithms, metrics, and evaluation service
interfaces for causal learning. In this paper, we introduce {\em CausalBench},
a transparent, fair, and easy-to-use evaluation platform, aiming to (a) enable
the advancement of research in causal learning by facilitating scientific
collaboration in novel algorithms, datasets, and metrics and (b) promote
scientific objectivity, reproducibility, fairness, and awareness of bias in
causal learning research. CausalBench provides services for benchmarking data,
algorithms, models, and metrics, impacting the needs of a broad of scientific
and engineering disciplines.
在见证机器学习(ML)技术在许多应用中取得巨大成功的同时,用户也开始注意到 ML 的一个重要缺陷:相关性无法替代因果关系。发现因果关系的传统方法是使用随机对照实验(RCT);但在许多情况下,这种方法不切实际,有时甚至不道德。从观察数据中进行因果学习提供了一种很有前景的替代方法。因果学习虽然相对较新,但其目标远远超出了传统的机器学习,但仍存在一些重大挑战。不幸的是,由于缺乏统一的因果学习基准数据集、算法、度量标准和评估服务接口,因果学习的发展受到了阻碍。在本文中,我们介绍了{/em CausalBench},这是一个透明、公平、易用的评估平台,旨在:(a)通过促进新算法、数据集和度量标准方面的科学合作,推动因果学习研究的发展;(b)促进因果学习研究的科学客观性、可重复性、公平性和偏见意识。CausalBench 提供数据、算法、模型和度量基准测试服务,满足科学和工程学科的广泛需求。