Toward Mitigating Sex Bias in Pilot Trainees' Stress and Fatigue Modeling

Rachel Pfeifer, Sudip Vhaduri, Mark Wilson, Julius Keller
{"title":"Toward Mitigating Sex Bias in Pilot Trainees' Stress and Fatigue Modeling","authors":"Rachel Pfeifer, Sudip Vhaduri, Mark Wilson, Julius Keller","doi":"arxiv-2409.10676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While researchers have been trying to understand the stress and fatigue among\npilots, especially pilot trainees, and to develop stress/fatigue models to\nautomate the process of detecting stress/fatigue, they often do not consider\nbiases such as sex in those models. However, in a critical profession like\naviation, where the demographic distribution is disproportionately skewed to\none sex, it is urgent to mitigate biases for fair and safe model predictions.\nIn this work, we investigate the perceived stress/fatigue of 69 college\nstudents, including 40 pilot trainees with around 63% male. We construct models\nwith decision trees first without bias mitigation and then with bias mitigation\nusing a threshold optimizer with demographic parity and equalized odds\nconstraints 30 times with random instances. Using bias mitigation, we achieve\nimprovements of 88.31% (demographic parity difference) and 54.26% (equalized\nodds difference), which are also found to be statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":501301,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While researchers have been trying to understand the stress and fatigue among pilots, especially pilot trainees, and to develop stress/fatigue models to automate the process of detecting stress/fatigue, they often do not consider biases such as sex in those models. However, in a critical profession like aviation, where the demographic distribution is disproportionately skewed to one sex, it is urgent to mitigate biases for fair and safe model predictions. In this work, we investigate the perceived stress/fatigue of 69 college students, including 40 pilot trainees with around 63% male. We construct models with decision trees first without bias mitigation and then with bias mitigation using a threshold optimizer with demographic parity and equalized odds constraints 30 times with random instances. Using bias mitigation, we achieve improvements of 88.31% (demographic parity difference) and 54.26% (equalized odds difference), which are also found to be statistically significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少飞行员学员压力和疲劳模型中的性别偏差
虽然研究人员一直在努力了解飞行员,尤其是受训飞行员的压力和疲劳情况,并开发压力/疲劳模型来自动化检测压力/疲劳的过程,但他们往往没有考虑这些模型中的性别等偏差。然而,在航空这样一个关键职业中,人口分布不成比例地偏向于一种性别,因此迫切需要减少偏差以实现公平、安全的模型预测。在这项工作中,我们调查了 69 名大学生的压力/疲劳感知,其中包括 40 名飞行员学员,男性约占 63%。我们先用决策树构建了无偏差缓和模型,然后使用具有人口奇偶性和均衡几率约束的阈值优化器构建了有偏差缓和的模型,并对随机实例进行了 30 次优化。使用偏差缓解后,我们的结果提高了 88.31%(人口奇偶校验差异)和 54.26%(均衡赔率差异),这两个结果在统计上也是显著的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Almost Sure Convergence of Linear Temporal Difference Learning with Arbitrary Features The Impact of Element Ordering on LM Agent Performance Towards Interpretable End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Prediction: Utilizing Administrative Claims Data with Explainable AI Techniques Extended Deep Submodular Functions Symmetry-Enriched Learning: A Category-Theoretic Framework for Robust Machine Learning Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1