Occupational Therapy in Carceral Settings: Qualitative Study of Practitioner Experiences and Perspectives

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1177/15394492241268850
S. Patel, M. A. Barnes, L. A. Jaegers
{"title":"Occupational Therapy in Carceral Settings: Qualitative Study of Practitioner Experiences and Perspectives","authors":"S. Patel, M. A. Barnes, L. A. Jaegers","doi":"10.1177/15394492241268850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scant evidence exists regarding occupational therapy in carceral settings. Exploring perspectives and experiences to understand current practices is needed. To explore how occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) navigate evaluation, interventions, and role delineation. Qualitative study using phenomenological and hermeneutic approaches Data gathered through semistructured interviews with seven OTPs with average experience of 16 months, representing six states and four practice settings. Themes were identified by two independent coders who analyzed the data with consensus by third researcher. Four themes emerged: managing contextual challenges, interpersonal professional relationships, evidence-informed services, and client-focused care. Practitioners applied various frames of reference, utilized self-report and observation evaluation methods, and implemented holistic direct and indirect interventions. Understanding and supporting the value of therapeutic relationships, activity/occupational performance analysis, and foci of occupational therapy (OT) domains and processes that emphasize indirect roles can further define and highlight the distinctive nature of OT within carceral settings.","PeriodicalId":47195,"journal":{"name":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otjr-Occupation Participation and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492241268850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scant evidence exists regarding occupational therapy in carceral settings. Exploring perspectives and experiences to understand current practices is needed. To explore how occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) navigate evaluation, interventions, and role delineation. Qualitative study using phenomenological and hermeneutic approaches Data gathered through semistructured interviews with seven OTPs with average experience of 16 months, representing six states and four practice settings. Themes were identified by two independent coders who analyzed the data with consensus by third researcher. Four themes emerged: managing contextual challenges, interpersonal professional relationships, evidence-informed services, and client-focused care. Practitioners applied various frames of reference, utilized self-report and observation evaluation methods, and implemented holistic direct and indirect interventions. Understanding and supporting the value of therapeutic relationships, activity/occupational performance analysis, and foci of occupational therapy (OT) domains and processes that emphasize indirect roles can further define and highlight the distinctive nature of OT within carceral settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱环境中的职业疗法:从业者经验和观点的定性研究
关于囚禁环境中的职业疗法的证据很少。我们需要探索各种观点和经验,以了解当前的做法。探索职业治疗从业者(OTPs)如何进行评估、干预和角色划分。采用现象学和诠释学方法进行定性研究 通过半结构式访谈收集数据,访谈对象为七名职业治疗师,平均从业经验为 16 个月,他们分别来自六个州和四个实践环境。主题由两名独立的编码员确定,他们在第三名研究人员的共识下对数据进行分析。最终形成了四个主题:应对环境挑战、人际专业关系、循证服务和以客户为中心的护理。实践者应用了各种参考框架,使用了自我报告和观察评估方法,并实施了全面的直接和间接干预。了解并支持治疗关系的价值、活动/职业表现分析以及强调间接作用的职业治疗(OT)领域和过程的重点,可以进一步确定并突出职业治疗在监禁环境中的独特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The aim of OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health is to advance knowledge and science in occupational therapy and related fields, nationally and internationally, through the publication of scholarly literature and research. The journal publishes research that advances the understanding of occupation as it relates to participation and health.
期刊最新文献
Comparisons of Occupational Balance Within Informal Caregivers of Individuals With Schizophrenia. Unraveling the "Greener Pastures" Concept: The Phenomenology of Internationally Educated Occupational Therapists. Cognitive Self-Efficacy in Parkinson's Disease. Item-Level Psychometrics of the Neonatal Eating Outcome Assessment in Orally Feeding Infants. Changes in Caregiver Burden in Older Adults' Caregivers During the COVID-19 Outbreak.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1