Impact and learner perspectives of a spaced-education platform to assess hand hygiene auditor competency

Ana M. Vaughan-Malloy, Renée Lehane, Mary M. Wells, Thomas J. Sandora
{"title":"Impact and learner perspectives of a spaced-education platform to assess hand hygiene auditor competency","authors":"Ana M. Vaughan-Malloy, Renée Lehane, Mary M. Wells, Thomas J. Sandora","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To ensure whether spaced education, which increases long-term knowledge retention, could be integrated into auditor competency assessment. Design: Quality improvement project. Setting: Academic, freestanding children’s hospital. Participants: Hand hygiene (HH) auditors. Intervention: We enrolled trained HH auditors in an online spaced-education platform to assess mastery of knowledge, delivering 46 unique questions at spaced intervals followed by rationale; we retired questions after 3 correct answers. An e-mailed 10-item survey gauged participant satisfaction with the program. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare change in median knowledge score from first to final attempt. Results: A total of 12,120 questions were attempted by 126 auditors, and 49 (39%) completed the entire course. Median knowledge score increased significantly by 10.5 percentage points (IQR 4–15) between first and final attempts (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Thirty auditors (27%) responded to the survey. The majority agreed the number and complexity of questions were appropriate (57% and 67%, respectively). Eighty-seven percent reported the platform easy to navigate, and 77% agreed adequate time was provided for completion. Free-text suggestions included delivering fewer questions at a narrower spacing interval over a shorter time frame because of competing work demands. Conclusions: Auditor knowledge of HH indications and technique is critical to ensuring data validity. A spaced-education competency program improved HH auditor knowledge in the short term. Completion rate was low, and some participants expressed a desire for fewer questions over a shorter time frame. This study offers insight into ways to optimize spaced education as a potential tool for HH competency assessment.","PeriodicalId":13558,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To ensure whether spaced education, which increases long-term knowledge retention, could be integrated into auditor competency assessment. Design: Quality improvement project. Setting: Academic, freestanding children’s hospital. Participants: Hand hygiene (HH) auditors. Intervention: We enrolled trained HH auditors in an online spaced-education platform to assess mastery of knowledge, delivering 46 unique questions at spaced intervals followed by rationale; we retired questions after 3 correct answers. An e-mailed 10-item survey gauged participant satisfaction with the program. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare change in median knowledge score from first to final attempt. Results: A total of 12,120 questions were attempted by 126 auditors, and 49 (39%) completed the entire course. Median knowledge score increased significantly by 10.5 percentage points (IQR 4–15) between first and final attempts (P < 0.001). Thirty auditors (27%) responded to the survey. The majority agreed the number and complexity of questions were appropriate (57% and 67%, respectively). Eighty-seven percent reported the platform easy to navigate, and 77% agreed adequate time was provided for completion. Free-text suggestions included delivering fewer questions at a narrower spacing interval over a shorter time frame because of competing work demands. Conclusions: Auditor knowledge of HH indications and technique is critical to ensuring data validity. A spaced-education competency program improved HH auditor knowledge in the short term. Completion rate was low, and some participants expressed a desire for fewer questions over a shorter time frame. This study offers insight into ways to optimize spaced education as a potential tool for HH competency assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估手部卫生审核员能力的间隔教育平台的影响和学习者视角
目的:确保能否将可提高长期知识保留率的间隔教育纳入审计员能力评估。设计:质量改进项目。地点:学术性独立儿童医院学术性独立儿童医院。参与者:手部卫生(HH)审核员。干预:我们将经过培训的手部卫生审核员纳入在线间隔教育平台,以评估其对知识的掌握情况,该平台每隔一段时间会提出 46 个独特的问题,并在问题后给出理由;在回答 3 个正确答案后,我们会将问题撤下。我们还通过电子邮件发送了一份包含 10 个项目的调查问卷,以评估参与者对项目的满意度。我们使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验来比较从第一次尝试到最后一次尝试的知识得分中位数变化。结果:126 名旁听者共回答了 12120 个问题,其中 49 人(39%)完成了整个课程。在首次尝试和最后一次尝试之间,知识得分中位数明显增加了 10.5 个百分点(IQR 4-15)(P < 0.001)。30 名审计员(27%)对调查做出了回应。大多数人认为问题的数量和复杂程度是适当的(分别为 57% 和 67%)。87%的人认为平台易于浏览,77%的人认为有足够的时间完成问卷。自由撰写的建议包括:由于工作需要,在较短的时间内以较小的间隔提供较少的问题。结论:审核员对 HH 适应症和技术的了解对于确保数据有效性至关重要。间隔教育能力项目在短期内提高了 HH 审核员的知识水平。完成率较低,一些参与者表示希望在更短的时间内减少问题。这项研究为如何优化作为 HH 能力评估潜在工具的间隔教育提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Healthcare worker attitudes on routine non-urological preoperative urine cultures: a qualitative assessment Use of human-centric and participatory design for modifying a daily environmental cleaning checklist: a quality improvement study A need for a global alert system for rapid recall of contaminated products to prevent ongoing hospital outbreaks. Impact and learner perspectives of a spaced-education platform to assess hand hygiene auditor competency Development and implementation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Scoring Tool at a single pediatric institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1